N 1 still the best one... This option will raze all the smaller indies giveaways, ppl are entering on SoMC giveaways nowadays but really few of them will vote for this game. Probably the leecher userbase will flood the voting system with skyrim and mw3
Comment has been collapsed.
118 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by RePlayBe
67 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by bob12857
19 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by VariLend
61 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by SHOBU007
3,675 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ghostgg10
370 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Nobodynone
1,650 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Tecfan
43 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by FruitCober
71 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Keepitup
72 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by Lugum
53 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CheMan39
31,147 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ManOman
106 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DanielStoSve
64 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Yoriyari
Thanks to a couple of users for suggesting different aspects of this idea.
Proposed changes to contributor values
Contributor value is no longer calculated using dollars and cents, it's based on what the community would like to see posted. Value would be determined based on game votes. This would mean users could view a page of all the available games, and check off games they like to see in giveaways, up to 10% of the total games. They can modify this list at any time. Perhaps they win a game they checked off, well, they can uncheck it, and check something else they are now interested in seeing. If the data is not modified within a few weeks, it's discarded from calculations, so we're only looking at fresh information. For example, let's say Half-Life 3 is coming out next month. People visit the voting page, and check it off saying they would like to see HL3 giveaways. Meanwhile, common games, such as Shadowgrounds might not receive many votes, along with low interest games, such as Railworks. If you create a HL3 giveaway, you might receive 10 contributor points, and if you posted Railworks, 1 contributor point. This value is assigned based on current data, and would not change over time. This means, a year from now, say HL3 is already owned by everyone, and there's now little interest, your value wouldn't drop from 10 to 1, but rather remain at 10 points.
Now users would have the option to create giveaways only for those with a minimum number of contributor points. For example, if you set your giveaway at 100, this would mean entering users would have previously needed to giveaway 100 games that few people were interested in, 10 games that everyone was looking to play, or anything in between.
Of course, we would need to discuss a fair method of converting over the current contributor values into contributor points. If people think this option has any potential, we can start tossing around ideas.
Feedback
Add your thoughts below, we're trying to explore all sorts of different directions, and we need user feedback.
Comment has been collapsed.