Playtime offline isn't recorded by Steam, so I'm against this proposal as I don't think it should be a requirement that people be connected to the internet whilst playing.
See in my case Osmos and World of Goo. Steam says I've barely played them, reality would put me well over 10 hours for both.
Comment has been collapsed.
+1 Also, what if the gifter wins the game but realizes he cannot play for a while because he has a tough period in life and doesn't get much time for games at all. Based on what you say, he would loose hid gift just because he is having a tough time in life.
Oh, and how exactly do you propose that a gift be removed from a person's steam account? Once the gift is received, it is tied to that person's account. You cannot get it back to reroll- unless if he hasn't activated it.
Comment has been collapsed.
@Rand I can see the problem with that, but what I'm proposing is just a set time played. Unless you want to stay offline mode for the rest of your life, I wouldn't say that it would be hard getting let's say 100 hours eventually.
And @h4r5h4v3ng3r, the point is that you have to have the requirement of playing before you can join.
Comment has been collapsed.
i don't like this idea. if i play one game for hours, that does not mean, i'll play another game for hours. so that won't stop me from ignoring my gift.
a better idea would be to make the user play his new gift for at least 10 hours before getting another gift..:) well.. yes, everything is exploitable...:)
and there should be a legit way to baypass that restriction by giving away something else in exchange
and that exchange gift should not be some exploited game, like HIB, DM MP, Eets, Dirt3, ..., or some cheap/free DLC
Comment has been collapsed.
Suggestion make all your suggestions in one thread and dont spam the forums with suggestion threads.
Comment has been collapsed.
I disagree, the serious gamers I know all have a backlog of games they need to get around to, myself included. Just because a new game isn't played much or even at all within the first week or even month, doesn't mean it isn't going to be enjoyed.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you really want to know someone will use your gift, then you should give it to someone that really wants it. By putting it on steamgifts as a public giveaway, you run the risk that the person who wins won't appreciate the gift as much as you want them to. Example, I entered a bunch of frozenbyte bundles just because I thought splot looked cute. Since splot isn't even out yet, it looks like I haven't touched the bundle (well I did play trine, it's pretty fun). But if the giver wanted me to play every game in the bundle the week I won it, well, they're out of luck.
Comment has been collapsed.
302 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Wok
177 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Reidor
8 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by TheRevenantKnight
38 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by fr0zenX
16 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by sensualshakti
318 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by devotee
32 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by DrR0Ck
1,275 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Eremeir
437 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by aquatorrent
254 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by TwixClub
10,404 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Teleute
27 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by Fluffster
3,987 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Midnight12891
61 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by EyeofArrow
Now, many gifters will be pissed off that once the recipient got the gift, they won't be playing it. The gifter can ask for a reroll so then it can be hopefully gifted to a more active person, but how about making it a requirement in order to enter giveaways? I know this can be easily bypassed by idling in TF2, but this is just an idea right now. I haven't thought of the exact details yet.
Comment has been collapsed.