10 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by gameboy9725
16 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Tenn
238 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by BHTrellis188
386 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by Bum8ara5h
18 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by RobbyRatpoison
214 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by Bentosan
1,736 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by MBaer
127 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Edward11
162 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by xurc
658 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by Patxxv
10,282 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
166 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by AgainstAllOdds84
121 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by g2gfast
2,963 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Yamaraus
Here is a intriguing theory that someone claims:
video1
video2
video3
video4
video5
video6
He claims the fictitious roles are played by using:
Camera Lens Distortion, Makeup, Different Lighting Systems, Prosthetic Based Modifications, Covered Birthmarks and Scars, Hair Wigs, Teeth Covers, Eye Color Change with Eye Contacts, etc.
He says that these people play fictitious roles that are presented as factual reality on some of the news and some other public media events that are believed by the public to be real. He dismisses bulls*it like David Icke's, Disclosure Project and Inelia Benz by prooving they are actors playing roles to fool the masses. He also claims that Obama also played Osama character.
Most of the news are pre-packaged, directed and staged with actors and then sent to TV stations for broadcast as real events.
He claims none of the school shootings were real.
What is your oppinion on his claims?
Note: If you research his claims and they are not true, that's not a big problem, but if you dismiss his claims and they are true, that's of huge importance.
the claimer's website
the claimer's facebook
Comment has been collapsed.