You don't need to agree with me, you're entitled to your opinion which I'm happy to hear but please don't insult me for my views.

-- RANT - UNPOPULAR OPINION --

"Waiting for a sale" "Waiting for it to get bundled"

I hear this all the time, people even say this when they're talking about a game they actually want to play. It's especially annoying when they're talking about a small indie game with a price tag of $9.99. We're spoiled.

Getting a bargain? It's great! Intentionally looking for an amazing game to lose its value? Wrong on so many levels!

Don't they realize that this sort of thinking simply kills the video game industry? (especially the indies), "getting bundled" is already a huge devaluation to a game.

I think we shouldn't be cheap-ass for a game we like, in most countries people can easily afford to cough up the full price for a great game, instead of waiting to pay $1 for it with tens of other games they won't play anyway.

I think this is selfish thinking and we're just killing the industry, and harm the developers we like. I too bought many bundles to pick up some old title, or a semi-decent game but I also pay full price for the games I really like just to show my appreciation to the developers.

If we'd buy only the games we want, and for their real price we wouldn't have a giant pile of shame (I'm talking about the backlog) and the developers wouldn't have a problem putting out new games. Most indie games are reasonably priced anyway.

Let's think a bit less about ourselves and think a bit about others, the developers.

Also don't tell me that (literally) everybody is too poor to buy a game at full price. This rant is not about people who don't have the money.

-- RANT --

UPDATE: After reading the responses. I must agree with people who said that this way of thinking is also the fault of the Devs, Bundlers and the Industry in general who are following these business practices. It's not entirely the consumer's fault that we've come to this, I'd say it's 50-50.

9 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

You do realize that not everyone has enough money to buy games for a full price?

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I do realize yes, however most of the people who think this way can actually afford to buy games at full price. If you are too poor to buy a game, you're probably too poor to buy a gaming PC too (speaking of third world countries).

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A computer has become neccessity... Although, gaming computers aren't, but sometimes you go a little extra to buy something, It's an one time investment which lasts for many years (unless you walways want to play with ULTRA graphics)... Doesn't mean you can pay (full price) for all the games that you like. clearly, these games will end up costing more than the trouble you went to and paid for the (gaming) computer.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

since when do you need a gaming pc for games? for aaas ok, but there's a lot more games you can play on even 10+ years old computers.
Or maybe someone has saved up money for a pc. that doesn't mean he will now save money for each game, since gaming is just one part of computer usage. If it's your main goal to play games, you have addiction, mate :D
If you haven't noticed, there's a lot of users on this site who's just here to win something to play.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

sometimes we dont need a gaming pc to play a indie game

i think if we dont have deals that person will just take a free copy in piratebay instead of buying a singleplayer game

E.G.: i had played batman: asylum and liked so much that i bought batman:City, but i only bought it on a sale, because i dont have money to buy singleplayer games, the ones i have was on bundles

So even if is little money for the developer i think is better than no money

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

SO what? They can do whatever they want to. If they don't feel like buying the sodding thing for the full price then its absolutely OK.

You should rather blame the devs for not delivering a game thats even remotely worth the full price tag.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can buy a pc from the store and for steam games u need to actually buy it via Visa,Paypal.. What if someone doesn't have one in his country (like me)... I don't really beg for stuff since I try to get it myself with abit of trading or some other interwebz magic.

I can buy game that I like for full price if only I had some method of payment to use here

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Your case is a special case, obviously there are exceptions. Still the majority of the people aren't in the same boat as you.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

So you are saying that I should stop eating and start coughing out money for games instead?

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you're so poor that you barely have money for food then you probably shouldn't spend on gaming huh?

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I am not, at the moment at least :P
But if someone isn't that poor, but can spare little money.. he can get the games at cheaper, much affordable (for him) price by waiting for a sale/bundle.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

your outlook is flawed, a good budget for low income people always has about 15-20% for entertainment otherwise the budget wont work. if you say your too poor don't spend money on entertainment, the budget wont work because it will be broken. now if your so poor that you end up spending the money you spend on food, well, then you broke the budget, IMO Tsukiruka sounds like he is possibly referring to following budget, something that should be applauded not scorned like you are doing, and like many others always do when this type of conversation comes up. so respectfully shut up when it comes to that kind of comment.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nobody forces you to play games in the first place. What you do with your money and "budget" is none of my damn business I give you that. However I still think that you should still support the games you LOVE and pay full price for them (for your own good).

I too keep a strict budget but when I have let's say 10% to spend on games I buy 2 games I know I'll love to play for full price instead of buying 200 bundle junk for -99% that I will never even open.

However you told me to "respectfully" (I don't know how is that respectful) "shut up" so you're obviously not interested in my opinion.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's nice of you to buy 2 full priced games instead of bundles.
I wouldn't do that though.. sure, I bought bundles.. but not just because "OMG! CHEAP GAMES!".. I bought them because 1 (or more) games in the bundle interested me, the rest were activated because.. well.. doesn't hurt to try. Now when I think back, I feel I shouldn't have activated those games and should have just made giveaways here or something.. Out of the 200+ (don't remember exact number, too lazy to check) games that I have.. there are at least 50 games that I am sure I will never play, most of them I have tried (not all though)... I don't know why I am even talking about this XD

What I wanted to say was... if I had the money (yes, if I had it.. all the time I bought games were when I had low budget.. before that I never earned money.. and I am not earning now.. so zero budget).. and I was 100% sure that I would love the game (this is very rare for me, I don't know about others though.. Till now, There has only been one game that I was sure to love.. it wasn't even available in my country XD) I'd probably buy too..

Also, I don't feel like paying (much) for digital copies of games.. doesn't feel like I own the game ._.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nobody forces you to buy games in the first place.

Yes, listen to Laptoprocker and just pirate them, save a lot of money for food. Oh, wait, that's illegal.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think I wasn't clear enough.

Let's put it this way: "Nobody forces you to PLAY video games in the first place."

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ok. But someone wants to play, and has no money for games. Choice is between being a pirate or waiting for the game to be discounted/bundled. What would you recommend to them?

I mean, if they can wait and will not pirate it in the meantime, what's it to you?

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Obviously I recommend them buying it in a bundle or during a sale. However I'm not talking about people who don't have the money, I'm talking about people who do have it.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They have it because they know when to save it. If the game will be bundled for sure, why spend more money than you should? It's not their responsibility to preserve the industry. New wave will come after the old ones die.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I wait for sales. Not because I "can't afford", but because I think that overpaying for something just to play it earlier isn't that much of an advantage, at least for me.

The prices will eventually drop, not only because of sales but also because the price drops naturally, so if you're not eager to play, it's wise to end up paying less for it.

I don't mind paying full price for indie games and such, when I want to help the developers, knowing how hard it is. But I'll never buy a full priced AAA title ever again, since there'll be plenty of people that's gonna fill their pockets in no time anyway.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's a valid point, AAA titles get their profit regardless (even if they're bad games). I don't see AAA games bundled often anyway, I'm mainly talking about the indie devs.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But the point of sales and bundles is that many people that would never give a single peny for the game will end up doing so.

In the end, a bundled/cheap game will raise an amount based on its sales volume, so its a fine business model. They may raise additional money with DLCs, or even drag extra attention to their next title... that's how it's working nowadays with bundles mainly.

Here's a good example of a sale that worked: PixelJunk Eden Steam sale doubled Q-Games' income

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What an idiot.

Most of the gamers dont have a job and still go to school. Who would give 50€ for a game of 10h length today when you can buy games like deus ex,witcher,bioshock infinte for <5€

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1 agree.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Exactly.

And also, those 'nine dollar indie games' are a huge risk. Some of them may be amazing, but so many of them are junk that it's easier to wait a good while and not only see if they go on sale but also see what people are saying about them and whether they actually get updates or whether the devs just abandon them.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No need to call names, I explicitly asked everybody to keep it civil. I'm not an "idiot" I have an opinion which you might not agree with.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

For some people that's the same thing.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

<OFFTOPIC> Hey I found my long lost avatar brother! </OFFTOPIC>

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Maybe to my eyes it's not worth the asking price. Maybe I don't have that kind of money now. Maybe it's not just the videogames industry, but shopping in general (see a brand of soap 50% off and go "I would not usually grab that, but since it's on discount I might as well give it a try"). Maybe I'm not willing to pay the premium price of instant access and rather spend half the money (you know, spending less money for an equally valid product is a good habit). Maybe I'm not a charity and if they want more money from me they have to do better marketing and/or offer me more, since I work for my money and it doesn't rain from the sky. Maybe offer is way higher than demand and eventually the garbage will die out because it's not sustainable anymore.
It's also better than piracy: developing costs are already spent, so selling more copies of a digital product means increasing profit, regardless of the price point.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's a valid point. I don't agree with you but I understand why you think that way, its reasonable. You're right that it's still better than piracy.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Let's turn the tables here, if you are complaining about people who can not afford games at full retail price and have to wait for sales. If you can afford to play full blown retail, then what are you doing here on this site trying to win free games? Why don't you just pack your rich butt up and go pay full retail and stop trying to mooch off others who are offering games for people who might not otherwise be able to get them,

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Interesting twist on the debate!

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sorry I can only respond to grown-up normal people who can keep an argument civil.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I modified it for you (or myself, because I would like hear what you say about it)

Let's turn the tables here, if you can afford to play full blown retail, then what are you doing here on this site trying to win free games? Why don't you just go pay full retail and stop trying to mooch off others who are offering games for people who might not otherwise be able to get them?

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can also be here to gift games. But that's not the point.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I came here for the free games and stayed for the community, I barely enter giveaways and I don't even expect to win them. I like these forums because I can read about the newest game news, gossips and ask for advice on games (for example if they're worth getting or not).

I'm happy that I could achieve an 1:1 wins-giveaways ration and I aim to keep it that way.

No I'm not rich (not poor either) and I can't afford EVERY game I wish to have, however I'm willing to spend on games that are truly outstanding and worth the price (I bought Skyrim LE for full price for example)

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

3000 giveaways entered in 5 months, yep you barely enter giveaways.I keep it civil: have a nice seat on my blacklist.Bye.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You still responded :D

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

boom! headshot

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I never paid for the game more than 5€. My philosophy. That's all.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Most of the games these days go on sale for sure, eventually.
And many (indie) games get bundled.

Now, if they really think that if people buy their games on sale or when in a bundle it will be a loss for them, why put the game on sale/bundle in the first place?
Do you think they are all so selfless people that they do something which doesn't profit them?

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think it depends how important a game is for you. If it is a game i want now, i just buy it but if i want it, but not right now, why not wait til the price drops a little.
It happened, that i bought games more than one time for different gaming systems (xbox, pc etc.) because i really love them and want to support the devs (and because they were not that new and cheap^^).
But i get your point and think you are right. If everyone would wait until the price drops the devs would not get enough money (often a problem for excellent but less sold games). So it depends if they deserve getting my full money or less or nothing.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think we're on the same page.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The people who control the value of games are the publishers. If they weren't so keen to devalue their products by quickly going to sale or shoving their games in bundles then people would pay full price more often. It's supply and demand, and right now the market is being flooded with cheap games so people get used to it.

I do think it is possibly harmful to the industry, but believe it's for the industry to fix and not the consumers. All they need to do is stop going to sale/bundles as quickly as they do now, and if customers are thinking "wow, that looks great, and it won't be on sale for 2-3 years" then they'll be much more likely to pay full price. If folk know it's going to be on sale in 3-6 months then it often makes sense to wait.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That is most likely true, for the ones who can afford and want the game.
I also believe taht another reason to wait is DLCs.. many games cough out so many DLCs which cost higher than the base game it self...

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This is right, too many DLCs nowadays and not many which give a real value to the game, just Weapon Pack #1, Costume Pack #3, that is why people often just wait for a GOTY edition.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That would be a very bad idea. If you wait 2-3 years for a sale, most people remotely interested, who aren't willing to pay full price, will have either: 1.) Picked up a different game that was on sale, or 2.) Completely forgotten about said game. If you get a $5 cut from Steam when you sell your game on sale for $7.50, it's at least 5 times better than getting $0 because that person didn't ever want to buy your game.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree it would be a bad idea to wait that long before offering discounts in the current climate. I'm talking more as if the industry got together and agreed amongst themselves to do this, and if it became a standard thing for them to do. There would be games on sale if this was the standard, but they'd be older games. The choice would be between a new shiny game at full price or an older title at a reduced price. Now we get newish, or not so old titles at a reduced price.

Is it realistic for this to happen? Probably not, as companies are always going to try to compete with each other in terms of discounts even if they agree in principle that this race to the bottom isn't sustainable. And of course, customers love discounts.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A great point, I didn't think of that.

It's true that the industry isn't helping either.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Games are just not that important to me that I need to play them on day one. And since i have a huge backlog, I don't see the point of paying more for something that will most probably go down in price before I even had the time to play it. There are a few exceptions, and I have even pre-ordered a couple of times for games I really wanted to play ASAP (and wanted to support the developer) but most of the time I don't buy any game that's not at least 50% off.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yep you're just an ordinary customer, you're doing things right. I don't urge anybody to buy bad or half-decent games, I just want to see that people actually buy the games they do want for reasonable price.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree with you. Let's be unpopular together. Deals are a great thing and can definitely help a game gain some exposure, but we should also support the developers. shrugs

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why don't you do one of these things so that the devs get the money, instead of other people.
1> Buy the game from the developer's site (if available, whether it is DRM-Free or any DRM)
2> Contact the devs and arrange for buying from them directly.
3> Contact the devs and donate money to them.
Show them how much you support them, don't buy from steam or any sites which take a cut of the money.. buy from the devs, directly!

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I often do. :) And I'm not forcing you to. I've just posted my opinion - because to the developers, this is their job. It's what pays them the rent and buys them food. If you reread what I wrote - I'm not against discounts. They serve a purpose. I just think that if someone likes a product, they should consider supporting those who made it possible :).

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's good then, you are true to what you say then :P
Yes, I noticed you did say "deals are a great thing but we should also support the developers" xP
Even though that was a reply, it was targetted towards all the people who say support devs and pay full price.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I doubt, that anyone would buy the same amount of games for the regular retail price. At the end the budget is the same.
And there is one more point. Its not like milk-price dumping. Many more people buy game xy if its on sale( digitals copies with nearly zero more costs for developers , publisher, retailers and so on). It is their decision to put something on sale to generate more sales and at the end more money. And those bundles are also a way promotion. There are several games I have first seen here an steamgifts and bought them.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The flippant attempts to justify this behavior ITT are quite sad. Sad and lame.

Focus less on pure consumption and more on creating original intellectual property personally and the OP will begin to appear more sensible to you.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Screw me for wanting to play a game and not being a programmer, or wanting to read a book without being a novelist, or wanting to drink a lemonade without being a farmer!

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I didn't say "screw you," but simply to consider the other side of the coin. It is often extremely difficult for us to truly consider the viewpoint of another human being.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I am a artist, so I focus quite a bit on the creation of original intellectual property. Personally I don't really see the OP as THAT sensible because when I am selling my artwork it hurts. If I could, I would give it away for free. But unfortunately we live in a world revolving around money... I don't really have a better solution for the world, But deep down the creation of truly good IP isn't with the end goal to create profit. It is for the message, the image, and the emotional impact that you can impart upon your fellow man, and possibly generate a entirely new way of thinking.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But if no one ever plays your game, you don't get that chance. Or, you don't earn enough to find the next creative endeavor, you won't get another chance.

Too often the cry against creators is, "well you ENJOY it don't you?? That should be enough." And fallacy is quite obvious to any artist, including yourself.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

of course, as I said unfortunately we live in a world that requires monetary exchange. I was thinking in a more hypothetical nature where the world would value the exchange of ideas as money. that would be my paradise. and so I wouldn't really feel distraught about selling my artwork in this world for less and less except for the primal need to sustain myself. my creation isn't just about enjoyment, as I hope all others who participate in creation feel, but of course it is a factor.

BTW sorry if im somewhat incoherent, I am moments from my bedsheets

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't wait for sale, sale waits for me.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm sorry to see that most people are too childish to keep a civil argument. No need to call me an "idiot" or "rich ass". I understand if you have a different opinion, but I won't listen to you if you can't express it properly

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"I'm taking my ball and going home" is similarly non constructive. You knew the topic would be unpopular, but you aren't the only one who shares your view either.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"sad and lame" isn't an opinion, it's an insult.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What? I was agreeing with your view, and noting that the attempts at justifying the "waiting" mentality are sad and lame. Ease off your guns there, hoss

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Then I misunderstood you :)

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

My eyes/brain might have been screwed up, but it appears to me you fall into the category "People with my opinion are awesome, everybody else is lame"

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

^

Edit: your initial contribution to the thread was this: "So you are saying that I should stop eating and start coughing out money for games instead?"

pot, meet kettle

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't see what's wrong with asking someone if that's what they mean o.o

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think it's a case of "I have an opinion, and everyone else is aggressively attacking my opinion (not constructive criticism), so perhaps I'm allowed to be a little insulted" kind of thing. Because everyone responding appears to be taking it really personally. Yet I don't see you commenting on how everyone else (The vast majority responding) think "People with my opinion are awesome, everybody else is lame". Perhaps a matter of perspective, I don't know.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ah, well.. you should be ready for attacks.. especially on unpopular opinions (he said so himself).
I found him to be complaining the most :P
I am sure everyone falls into that category, just for different reasons.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you read the responses I gave to people who (even though not agreeing with me) could express their opinion in a civil manner you can see that I only said "Valid point" "I understand" or "I respect your opinion". I don't see how is that biased. I still think that calling people or their views "sad" or "lame" is insulting.

I'm even willing to change my opinion and listen to others. (for example I accept that the industry/devs aren't helping this problem either)

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Lol. I firmly stand by the assessment that ITT justifications against either the producers, the devs, or any other targeted blame that doesn't cast one iota of guilt onto the consumer, are both sad and lame. xP

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes, I have read those.. and that was nice of you.
Now I have no idea what to do when i have seen both sides of the coin :|

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can "go rogue" and choose not to agree with anyone :D

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The whole point to this discussion is that people shouldn't be made to feel like dirt because they waiting for a sale. It was pointless for this person to be ranting about something that has no bearing on him, he's not losing money do to a sale. If he thinks the companies are being robbed, then he has the right to purchase the games before or after the sale has ended.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree, and also the Steam Summer Sale is nearly here so waiting for sales would be a smart ideal thing to do, BRING ON THE SHIT!

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree about the bundling thing, it makes it seem like they are desperate for people to play their game. But sales come and go and I don't see how that would devalue a game. I once bought a game full price (only $10) and then a week later it was on sale. Oh, well. But if I wasn't checking every day to see what the sales are I would never have known that it was on sale and that I could have gotten it cheaper.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They probably are desperate for people to play their game. If you created something with your own hands and mind, something you poured months or years of your life into, then you too would want people to see it.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

We're not killing the industry by buying bundles, and what, you think the developers aren't contacted when one of their games is chosen to possibly be put on sale for FAR more than it normally is? Of course not. Humble Bundle and numerous other sites don't just throw whatever together, they actually have to do things to not get sued. Most games in bundles are put there to try and give them a little boost, get them seen a little more, so that (hopefully) when the bundle is over, more people will buy it after they've seen a friend play it, or the friend tells them about it.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What you call "intentionally looking for an amazing game to lose its value" others call "patiently waiting for a lower price". It was the indie developers who created this mindset of waiting by throwing anything and everything into bundles.

I personally don't see where you or anyone else thinks they should have a say in how others spend their money, but thanks for your opinion.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I thank you for expressing your opinion in a civil manner, I don't have a say in how anybody spends their money, its none of my business however I can try and inspire people to think about their actions and how they affect the industry. You're right saying that we got spoiled by the bundles, indie devs, neither the consumers nor the game creators are helping this problem but somebody should start (I guess).

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

We're spoile indeed. Have you ever thought about the reasoning why we are being spoiled? The developers themself put their games in bundles just a couple of months after launch. Or they do a 50% sell after 2 months. Fuck that, why buy a game for full price if it will be cheaper in the matter of a couple of months. I prefer to buy 12 games of 5$ instead of one game for 60$.

Also, I'm not poor; it's a choice to not buy games at full retail price.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"Yeah man, who wants to buy all those indies for $60-- they're priced so EXPENSIVELY these days"

Point being, waiting for a sale with a AAA ($60) title is nothing new, which is why the OP is commenting on the same attitude also descending toward mid-range and micro-budget titles.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

First of all I've yet to see an indie game for $60. You're right buying games for less is a choice and I respect that.

Let me put it this way: what if the developers are sell their game for an 50% discount few months after the release because nobody buys it for full price. (and not because the game is bad, but because everybody is waiting for a sale/bundle)

"why buy a game for full price if it will be cheaper in the matter of a couple of months" yep that's why the indie developers messed things up and dug their own graves.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Okay, so we are spoiled for not buying games at full price.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I admit, if I can get a game cheaper then I will get the game cheaper. However, I do buy some games at full price because I am interested in playing them. It's the interest part that decides for me if I want to pay full price or not. Especially if I already like the developers, because I respect the time and dedication they put into games to create a unique experience. When it comes to AAA titles, I get about 85% of them during sales or discounts, unless it's made by companies I respect.

I have a lot of games, I don't need to wait for sales or bundles, so that's not how I think. I pick up bundles or cheap games because I can. Bundles are released every week and if I have the money I pick them up. At least I am paying for them, and since when is paying for something killing the industry? :D

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Dude, I could afford buying a decent rig for gaming 2 years ago which even today runs new games on high (maybe not so ultra) but I can't afford to buy every major 40-50 euro game on release, because where I live price of the game is a 1/15 of the whole computer.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He didn't say you should buy all major releases. People even say it about a $6 indie game they want.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He did mean (all) the games which we like though.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

So that's only 5%/10% of major releases since most are shit nowadays :(

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, they might be for you.. but who knows about other people :P

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I can't see how me not having money to buy games, destroys indie developers. What the hell. I can't afford games, period. I always will buy from a cheaper seller. And Enzime is right, 80% todays games SUCK.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm not talking about picking up a "half decent" game (for a metascore of 73/100 for example) on a sale, or buying it in a bundle, but for god's sake at least support the devs of the games that we absolutely LOVE and enjoy playing again and again. Most people don't even realize that if they support the devs that they like they will get more, and even better games from them in the future. It's an investment of sorts.

I didn't buy all the games I own on full price, I'd be broke if I did so. (my library is worth almost $3000 at the moment) I bought MOST of them on sales and from bundles.

However the games that I absolutely love and played for tens of hours I bought for full price. (Skyrim, Fallout 3/NV, Civilization 5 for example)

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, they asked for it.

They literally flooded the market with games. Some are very good, but mostly, just average games not different from anothers, others are really awful.

Some time ago, being an indie meant something, they were delivering high quality games. But now (cant speak about all of them tho) they just make games, doesnt matter if it has replay value, or even if the thing works at all, some wont even start.

By flooding the market, prices have to go down, i mean, the number of gamers who pay has not gone up too much in comparison with the amount of games that are being produced.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

My most played games are League of Legends and Hearthstone, I didn't pay anything for them and I don't plan to do so in the future. In my case I compere all games to them. I got hundreds of hours of playtime for free, obviously normal games are not even close to that.

But why did I even start buying games in the first place? Why not just play F2P games? Because of huge Steam sales and bundles! Without them I would never start to buy them in the first place. And I'm pretty sure developers are happy to get at least some money for my 300+ Steam games in compression to just playing F2P games without spending any money.

Also, I don't think that bundles are a bad thing for indie developers. They help to boost their game sales and making the game more popular (if it's good) same goes for the Steam start page (e.g. for sales). (Best thing I found after 10 sec googeling, I know I'm lazy...)

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 9 years ago by Laptoprocker.