Why would they get banned? As far as I know, Humble Bundles are still allowed to be gifted, and since its a separate key, its allowed to be gifted separately. The game itself will be added to the bundled listed and everything will continue as normal.
Comment has been collapsed.
Where did you get the information that it's restricted to Germany?
There was just an issue with keys to German customers who purchased the bundle prior to 23:00 CET on November 29th, they just need to email humble bundle support and they'll receive their German version key, but it's not restricted.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's not restricted to Germany, it's restricted to the rest of the world and not redeemable inside Germany.
From where: Look at the forum.
Edit: When you win a key here you don't get a German key. Those people haven't bought the bundle and Humble Bundle won't give them German keys (they don't even want you to share the keys).
Comment has been collapsed.
It's against Humble Bundle TOS to give away part of the bundle. All keys are for personal use. If you want to give away the games, you should buy a separate gift copy of the bundle to give out. SteamGifts does still respect those TOS, so you can(should) get in trouble for gifting part of a humble bundle regardless of whether it's region restricted. That's just the cherry on top of this situation.
Comment has been collapsed.
I just hope people don't abuse the whole Humble thing
some money goes to charity
also THQ gave us all some of the nicest games around and business is not going that good for them...
Comment has been collapsed.
and you entitled to your opinion, but you forget how many people have their jobs on the line right now. . . So in spite of your spite for one mistake a developer made and sticking it to a publisher. . . I'm gonna say that your wrong on the idea that this bundle is unjust. . . and Humble isn't just for indie games. You are thinking of indie royal and Volition. . . but they made Saints Row the third so they deserve money.
Comment has been collapsed.
Indie game site? Lol. Bastion and Shank are not indie, yet they were featured in HiB.
Comment has been collapsed.
Bastion- Warner Bros
Shank- Electronic Arts
So nope, not indie.
Comment has been collapsed.
Your point being?
You can also call the Halo series indie then.
Comment has been collapsed.
Does not make the games because of that. If the games are published by big publishers, they are not indie. Simple.
Comment has been collapsed.
...you do realize that by publishing them on Steam, they're publishing via Valve, a big publisher? By that logic, none of the games on Steam are indie.
Comment has been collapsed.
Except that the game was published by THQ in Europe and by Majesco Entertainment in North America.
Comment has been collapsed.
You're also an idiot. Bastion and Shank are both indie developers, only their publishers are mainstream and they have no control over the IP of those games. And they've done other bundles that weren't indie. Only the humble INDIE bundles are claiming to be indie. Fucking tards.
Comment has been collapsed.
Wow you're even stupider! THQ is selling their games on a PWYW scheme... [yes I am aware you can give it all to charity] A bailout is a loan. And on top of that the US banks are funded by the Federal Reserve. You're the reason your country is failing.
Comment has been collapsed.
i could even buy a GM car if they gave me a PWYW scheme...
Comment has been collapsed.
" And you take their games and run. Daf."
That is the stupideste thing I read today. The donation sliders are there for a reason. Hell, even the president of THQ donated all the money to charity.
Comment has been collapsed.
You are really an idiot. You hate the company but you still want the games. When you wanted to give money to charity, why didn't you give the money directly to them instead of taking games from a publisher that you hate on a site that you now hate?
PS: I have nothing against you people that also gave the money only to charity (which IMHO still isn't the best), it's just his stupidness.
Comment has been collapsed.
Who are you to say who deserves money and who doesn't?
Comment has been collapsed.
Humble doesn't just do Indie Bundles, Humble Bundles (previously known as Humble Indie Bundles)
Humble Indie Bundle
Humble Bundle Mojam
Humble Botanicula Debut
Humble THQ Bundle
Humble Bundle for Android
so get your facts right.
Comment has been collapsed.
As far as I know, giving away bundle games separately is now allowed.
Comment has been collapsed.
yep, It is against the FAQ to giveaway separate key's of a bundle
Comment has been collapsed.
It's against the rules, and they're knowingly attempting to up their contributor values via an invalid key because the key is region restricted. They are being banned, worry not.
Comment has been collapsed.
SR3 is provided as a separate key in addition to the bundle, not as part of it. Whilst they ask that you not separate games from the bundle you can't do that anyway. There shouldn't really be an issue with passing on SR3 keys.
Comment has been collapsed.
They don't have the means to fully enforce it as the problem was becoming too big. So they just changed the policy a few months ago and bundle games can only give you so much contributor status now. They still ask people not to break TOS but won't be the ones enforcing it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Actually, SG not-officially supports breaking the TOS. Whole reason why Bundle lists was created was making contributor status, which caused lots of Bundle-Games to appear, even through few of those had "keys are for buyer use only" point in TOS.
At first, all bundle giveaways were deleted. But after "over 9000" giveaway was deleted, cg decided to screw this, put $30 limit on bundle games and don't care about some giveaways breaking TOS, because it's giveaway-maker problem whether that giveaway breakes TOS or not.
Comment has been collapsed.
Question. Why Saints Row 3 is considered bundle game (since gifter would have to pay those $4 to get it, so it's like -90% sale), while games like Rome (with its $1) aren't?
Or there's some different reason here, like "it's not really permitted by bundle-owner, but tons of people would give them away anyway, so at least there's going to be a little punishment for that"?
Comment has been collapsed.
Because with the Indie Bundles you can set your own price - I believe that is the reason anyway.
With steam/amazon/publisher/develop bundles, you have to pay whatever price is set rather than whatever you want.
Comment has been collapsed.
Because you get $6 real contribution value for giving away the whole bundle (the right way to do it). You get bundle credit for giving away just SR because it's worth much less than $40 now.
You want your 6 bucks give away the bundle or buy a $1 below average bundle to give away with SR.
I agree that if the site wanted to split out SR for $5 and do a "THQ Bundle (SR Only)", that would work (or if they just wanted to have the regular SR 3 be worth $5 like Darkkrows suggests). But they haven't chosen to go down that route.
If Humble Bundle adds a game to the above average, then argument that SR is worth $5 is no longer valid.
I think the site doesn't want to encourage breaking up bundles (this is a guess). It's either the whole below average version, or the whole above average version if you want real contribution value. My guess is that this is a much easier policy to implement too - it's somewhat rare that the BTA value corresponds directly to 1 game key.
I think any argument that SR3 should be worth $5 real value would be stronger after the bundle is over and it's known that it is the only thing you get for $5. But again, I'm not sure the site will go for that argument.
Comment has been collapsed.
And bingo they added another game + DLC to the BTA, so the argument that SR should be $5 is no longer valid. Current Policy is working as intended.
Comment has been collapsed.
You will get Bundle contribution value which in your case since you've already maxed out your bundle contributions ($25 + MIN(.02 * real contribution value, bundle value), means your contribution value would not increase until you gave away non-bundle content. To get the full $39.99 for SR3 you would need to give away $200 worth of non-bundle games.
Comment has been collapsed.
This bundle thing is bad in one way actually. I got Bit. Trip. Runner Steam gift (gift not key) and it was bought. I gave it away and I didn't get shit. Why? Because I had given away bundle games before because I didn't need them. I want my fucking contributor value for Bit. Trip. Runner god damn it! I don't give a fuck about what I get from indie bundles and what I don't get for them but atleast give full amount of money for games that are giftable! This system sucks balls...
Comment has been collapsed.
You should just giveaway games for the sake of giving rather than for the contributor... The bundle list is to stop people from buying loads of games for $1 for a few and giving them away for contribution points of ~$10 per game. It doesn't suck.
If you were that bothered about the contribution value, why didn't you find a game that wasn't on the bundle list and then trade your Bit Trip Runner for a copy of the other game and gifted that?!
Comment has been collapsed.
Or you could not be a selfish prick and just take pride in that you made someone happy.
Comment has been collapsed.
17,175 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by Kenruyoh
8 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by fasderrally
1,760 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by jojo1241
272 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Foxhack
251 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by MeguminShiro
4 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Sewaz
29 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by GCTuba
99 Comments - Last post 59 seconds ago by jimmy09172000
51 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by 8urnout
138 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Ellemby
2,038 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hebert2099
188 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Fluffster
1,338 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by aquatorrent
134 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Zelrune
Comment has been collapsed.