The Department of Redundancy Department would like to invite you to become a member.
Comment has been collapsed.
You mean a deflationary monetary policy? -_- I'm not sure you're using "inflation" correctly.
Comment has been collapsed.
9 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Nikometa1
505 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by EntitledGamer
206 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by adam1224
8 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by AgainstAllOdds84
15 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by SupportForFun
5 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by reigifts
2,976 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Orionid
87 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Mupall
10 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Peiperissimus
296 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by LumpyCreature
157 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by WaxWorm
134 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Klaudika
25 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by WaxWorm
93 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by megusuri
Well, we are probably all annoyed by the fact that we all give away the same games all the time. What can we do about it?
we can limit the amount of a specific game that can be given away at any given time, but that is just annoying if you really WANT a specific game, or really wanna give it away
we can limit how many a single user can give away, they doesn't fix anything, as most people only give away one at a time.
this is IMO the best: we could add inflation, so the games that are rare give more points (cost too?) but the once that are "spammed" like the HIB's to give less (again cost?) this might encourage us to get some other games on the site :D
OFC it shouldn't be entirely based on inflation. they should still be loosely based on the price.
what do you think?
Comment has been collapsed.