My EVGA GTX 285 fried 2 weeks ago.

Been using nvidia for the past few years.

I was told that Radeon is better and costs less

However, searching through google gives mixed results.

What would be the best option for a 100$-200$ gaming GPU?

And whats a better bang for the buck? nvidia or radeon?

Is there even any major difference between the two?


EDIT:

I would like to thank everyone for helping with opinions and tips.

Especially darko55 for dedicating alot of time explaining and researching things

I think I will go with NVIDIA after all. Especially since it has Physx.

Probably GTX 560 or 650.


EDIT2:

Damn, with the flow of new comments about Radeons being superior and cheaper I'm tempted to try radeon since I've always been with nvidia.

And I'm almost tempted to try to cook the card back to life like MerkabahPT suggested, sounds crazy though.


1 decade ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Read reviews. Both have their good points and lesser points.
In that range I would say an AMD 7870XT or Nvidia GTX660(Ti).

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Been reading reviews but they're highly unconclusive.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

http://www.guru3d.com/
I always find their reviews quite well.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1 for guru3d <3

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Either way you'll be happy, and wondering if the other wasn't a better choice. :)

With AMD making the video stuff for the new console generation, maybe the new generation of lazy console ports will perform better on AMD hardware. But I don't have a crystal ball. Flip a coin, see who's got a good deal, the best bonus games, etc. Good luck! :)

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nvidia uses PhysX and Radeon uses Catalyst.

-PhysX Pwns.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's like saying Nvidia uses Forceware and AMD uses OpenCL :/

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Catalyst is just the control center of Radeon Video cards, nvidia have thenr own control center. PhysX is a different thing. (PhysX is a proprietary realtime physics engine middleware SDK. It was developed by Ageia with the purchase of ETH Zurich spin-off NovodeX in 2004. Ageia was acquired by Nvidia in February 2008)

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

AMD cards don't have 'physx' type of thingie?

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Technically no, but there is a version that is CPU independent and doesn't use the GPU at all.

In general though, not many games actually show an advantage of having it built into the video card.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_hardware-accelerated_PhysX_support

I have some of those games and they are all perfectly playable on my AMD HD5770. I also don't have everything turned up cause I don't have the most powerful of computers.

There are no games now that I know of that are Nvidia or AMD only. Most games that I know of include physics in the game and they play with very little difference between the 2 card types.

Basically just get what ever you can afford. I'm not fond of Nvidia myself, in the past they have released drivers that have actually killed cards and in some cases whole computers but that was years ago. While AMD has not done anything like that, they have had issues with their drivers too (drops in frame rates) and don't release updates as often as Nvidia.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%204017&IsNodeId=1&name=%24100%20-%20%24200
I prefer cards with 2 or 3 fans. The cooling is better and generally quieter.

Personally I am looking at going for an HD7870 or HD7970 in the future. Or if they are out something in the HD8000 series. I am targeting around the 300 to 400 dollar mark.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Problem with that is most games don't even use physx so 98% of the time the nvida card don't even use that.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Some games run better on Nvidia, some run better on AMD.

That said, since AMD chips are going to be in both the PS4 and the Xbox720, it might be a safer bet to go that route. Might. Nobody knows yet.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I second that

never thought of the idea with the next consoles, with them being so close to pc architecture it is propably going to be quite a nice advantage

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can use this for a quick comparison between models, once you decided your final budget. :)

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oo super awesome
edit: well radeon seems to be doing a lil better performance wise.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I prefer nvidia atm, ive got a 660TI myself (had HD6870 before, card was fine but didnt meet my expectations) :p

edit; I heard that the 7850 or 7870 are good cost vs performance atleast. compared to nvidia

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1 for 660ti

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well you get a bonuss free game if tou buy a ATI card

P.S You get 3 games with a 7800 series Blood Dragon, Tomb Rider and Infinite.
According to this clicky

Which is about 90$ in games?

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Same with nvidia :p

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Radeon has Boob Raider

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I lol'd

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Didnt nvidia have useles mmo ingame currency or smth? And its BS Infinite or Tomb Rider or both dont know but atleast one of them

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Metro last light and Assassin's Creed III on nvidia cards

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You get Metro Last Light with a 660 or above.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm an nvidia fanboy, do you really want my opinion?

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeh I used to love Nvidia too,
but their cards seem to be frying as of late.
Heard its cos they use bad fan system compared to Radeon.

But yeh I love the whisper nvidia lady

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I remember being really proud of my 5970, a double GPU card that was for a while the best graphics card out there.
I then watched comparisions to nvidias monsters and mine was still beter, running cooler and more silent, where the nvidia card was at 90+ °C and was EXTREMELY loud.

But I have an Nvidia on my notebook and I must say I really enjoy PhysX.

The question here really is.
PhysX or Eyefinity?

Plus ATI/AMD give you better hardware for the same price, there are differences in hardware usage though. ATI sort of lags a little bit when loading ressources while playing, coniniously so to say. Nvidia has bigger lags (I am not talking about seconds here, I am talking about microstuttering) but big intervals inbetween those. Plus Nvidia gets better results with worse hardware.

This is all I can say regarding this.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

True my friends gtx 460 is always running hot.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Add me on steam if you want a deal on a card.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oh? alrighty :3

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I helped him guys, he's going to decide against a 560ti and a 650ti I recommended the 560ti as it outperforms almost every card out there for 160 bucks. ranked 25th in the world.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He shouldn't get the gtx 560 ti. The gtx 650 ti boost is slightly better. It also offers 2gb of Vram instead of 1.25 or 1 that the 560ti has. The 650 ti boost uses less power too.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why would you do that?

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

NVidia bro, dont waste your time with radeon.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nvidia has the best $200 card so go with them, get the gtx 660.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Depends on where you live since the price varies.
But in the states the 7870 is the recommended card at $200

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

having read the posts here, sg is the best place for these situations indeed.

max points to whoever gets the silliness of what that means.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That question should have been posted on PC enthusiasts forum rather than SG especially considering current forum engine(no cattegories etc.) . Nonetheless it's natural that some individuals seeks computer help on gamey related forum and because we are a great community we provide for those individuals.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

^ +1 vote for max points to this guy

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In that price range I usually recommend Radeons because they have usually better performance/power consumption/price ratio than their Nvidia counter-parts. For bigger budget 300-400+$ I would lean towards GeForce though. It always boils to comparison between 2 similar models and extensive price research on ebay/online stores. In that price range you have 3 options (in order of overall performance). Radeon 7850 around 150$ ,GeForce 660 GTX and Radeon 7870 around 200$. If possible aim for overcloacked version especially in case of 7850.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I used to be an Nvidia guy but for the last 4 generations (HD4xxx-HD7xxx) I've been all AMD except for my low-power applications (Tegra, ION, Geforce Mobile.)

I'd say either one is fine but right now I'd lean toward AMD. Physx in it's current implementation is a joke and is best left off even if you have Nvidia hardware. You'll get lots of good free games right now with AMD too. I've also never had an AMD/ATI card die whereas I can count the number of fried Nvidia cards I've had with the fingers on both hands, but that could have just been luck.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Radeon nuff said

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nvidia's mid-end cards are too expensive for what they offer, especially the 660 and 660Ti.

I'm not from the US, but check this offer http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202025

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That offer is awesome considering it has free games in 150$ value

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

NVIDIA

But to further clarify, it may depend on what games you play. Many games are optimized for or developed using certain graphics controllers. If you play games that are optimized for NVIDIA cards, buy NVIDIA. Vice versa, Radeon.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Disregarding the whole fanboyism in this thread, I'd say you'll have to find the answer for yourself. Both cards offer advantages and disadvantages that should cater to most people's needs.

Right now, Nvidia cards do have the more extended set of features with downsampling and stuff like TXAA for instance, as well as smoother Anisotropic Filtering. They might be also a bit easier on power consumption, though that depends greatly on the card.

However, AMD have caught up greatly with the 7xxx series, with a much improved AF that does not flicker nearly as much as it used to do, as well as an overall good pricing that will get a lot of bang for your buck. Add on top of that a couple of free Steam games (Bioshock Infinite, Tomb Raider) and Crysis 3, should be a good incentive.

Personally, I'd go for the latter, but it's up to you.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The only dedicated card i have ever owned is my current GTX 660 ti and it is amazing so far. :)

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As of now, the biggest bang for the buck are the 7850/7870, the 7870 being my preference, in comparison to the NVIDIA counterpart, the mid range like those GPUS are a bit heavier on the wallet.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I've always had better luck with Nvidia drivers than ATI/AMD drivers, but I'm currently using a AMD with great results. My Nvidia fried, but was still under warranty, so they replaced it with an AMD model was a bit of an improvement.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Go with an Radeon. They have been outperforming the nVidia cards with similar prices, and the Never Settle deals or whatever they're called also get you a ton of games, which saves you money buying games.

However, a single brand is never the best option. Although AMD has been outperforming nVidia big time in the mid range, there are still exceptions to the rule. Read reviews and don't just go with nVidia because it has PhysX. AMD has TressFX, which completely bombs on nVidia cards (while the AMD card gets 60fps, the nVidia counterpart gets 8fps)

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I've been really happy with my new R7970, but i think in this case the 660ti might be the best choice.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

660 ti is nearly 300$

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Bought one of these a few weeks ago. 30% more performance than a GTX 660 Ti, and I snagged it for $30 off. Quite satisfied with it.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

how'd you get it for 30 bucks? tell me your secrets!

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oops. I'm durp

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I went with Nvidia for several generations until I got my recent Radeon's. I'd say to go with Nvidia. In my experience ATI has buggier drivers, more inter-frame latency (stuttering) even with a high frame rate.

At the time I bought into the benchmarks and reviews that said that AMD was better in the midrange etc... Unfortunately pure FPS is a poor measure of actual performance. I'll admit that I'm a bit of a power user though so my experiences and pickiness might not reflect the general population.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 1 decade ago by Tzell.