I would, but it costs so much for me. I think a 660 is around $300.
Comment has been collapsed.
A 660 is not even close to that price... It's $190. And if I were you, I'd rather build a new computer than have to deal with a low watt power supply and low end cpu.
Comment has been collapsed.
In NZ, it is, and a GTX 660 Ti looks quite big for my PC.
Comment has been collapsed.
750 is really weak and will go outdated fast. It's only so extremely barely more powerful than the old 560 ti (except has 2 GB of VRAM instead of 1, so for newer games, 560 Ti is actually better in some aspects), and way worse than even a 660.
I used to have a 660 Ti with an Athlon II x4 640 (which is quite a bit more powerful than your A6-3500), and it ran BF4 at low at 20 fps, and ran Far Cry 3 at high (dx11) at 30 fps. I upgraded my processor afterwards (kept the same card), and now run Far Cry 3 at ultra @ 60+ constant, and run BF4 at ultra at 60-75 fps. Just upgrade the processor first, it seems like a GPU would do more, but it really won't.
And 1 GB of VRAM is very small nowadays and is literally the bare minimum.
Comment has been collapsed.
Depends on the game. Far Cry is like Skyrim, in that it relies heavily on CPU performance. Most games aren't like that, but an increasing number of them are. Checking with various enthusiast websites can help you learn which games are more CPU-bound than the average game.
Comment has been collapsed.
If your cpu is going to be the bottleneck in your system performance with a 750ti, why would you waste the money in getting a 750? At this point you are just burning money unless you just need something to send images to your monitor. Without G-sync as you would get nothing with it so any added cost would just be burning more money.
Comment has been collapsed.
What CPU do you have? What kind of motherboard? And what kind of PSU?
Comment has been collapsed.
AMD A6-3500
GA-A55M-S2V (Socket M2) Mobo
350W PSU. No idea what the brand is.
Comment has been collapsed.
Why you will need to pay extra for G-Sync for this card? better spend this money on a better card, also G-sync is available for only some monitors, and it's not worth in that low end card. Also 1Gb of vRAM on this card is enough, because it's a low end.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you have a lack of money, have a small PC case, or have no need for the additional graphics power that the 760 offers, then the GTX 750 Ti is just about as perfect a choice as can be found. Very good balance of price and performance. Nearly the best, in fact.
The 760 (236 USD) is a better choice than the 750 Ti (130 USD) when it comes to performance per dollar. If you don't need the extra graphics power (pre-2010 games, any 2D games), definitely go with the 750 Ti.
As a final note, the 750 Ti is a powerhouse if you need to get a really short video card. Seriously, this thing will fit in any HTPC case that isn't height-limited.
Comment has been collapsed.
I just got one GTX 750 like a month ago and it is pretty good, i play Tomb raider on high on 1080p with like 60-70 fps, Crysis 2 high 1080 at 60 fps, Sniper elite 2 on ultra with 80-60fps and some times it drops to 40 fps when you use the scope, the thing is in my country the price is like the equivalent to 250 USD and i am quite happy with it, here the rest of my specs Motherboard: ASUS PH8H61-M LX2 R2.0, GPU: Zogis Geforce GTX 750 1gb, CPU: i3-3240 3.40GHZ, Memory: Patriot 4GB DDR3, Power Supply: Thermaltake SMART 550W.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you do get the GTX 750, can I have the Warface code that comes with it? :3
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, we'll let him decide. I bet you're gonna get it though. I haven't won anything yet in my time here. :/
Comment has been collapsed.
How much price difference is the ti version where you are? If its only a couple dollars like it is here(US) then I would still shoot for it.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm going to buy from Amazon instead, since the prices in NZ are stupid. $260 for a GTX 750 Ti, and on Amazon, its like $190 including the shipping.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hi, First of all you can put the computer specs you have right now? Also what kind of game you are planing to play and in what settings Low, high, ultra ect. 30fps, 60fps, 120fps
Comment has been collapsed.
31 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by devotee
2 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by yush88
2 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by FluffyKittenChan
12 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Konsterter
757 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Alfhar
1,958 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MeguminShiro
31 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hookjaw
40 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by CultofPersonalitea
65 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by CultofPersonalitea
8,131 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by CultofPersonalitea
10,814 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by CultofPersonalitea
41 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by CultofPersonalitea
2,132 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Xeradan
485 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by maisyne
Sorry for all of these threads, I just need help in making sure I do everything right.
My plan was to get a GTX 750 Ti, but apparently, there's a chance it could bottleneck with my CPU.
I could have a go at overclocking it, but I'm going to pass that, and just get a GTX 750.
I know that I will be losing performance, but at the moment, it's probably the best for me right now.
With the GTX 750's, they only seem to have 1GB Ram, or VRam. Is that going to be a problem with games?
EDIT: and should I get a GTX 750 with G-Sync or without G-Sync?
EDIT 2: Ok, then how about an AMD Graphics Card? Can anyone recommend an AMD card, that can work with my A6-3500, and still give me a good performance?
Comment has been collapsed.