Would it be useful to you?
I don't support the idea mostly for one reason: It would result in people wasting no effort or interest entering primarily giveaways for better games, increasing the chances that these games end up with winners who don't actually care about them. Or at least less than many others.
We already have some search parameters, we have the option to hide and to wishlist. It is absolutely possible to navigate SG without even more guidance.
Comment has been collapsed.
33 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by PyroluxAemilius
21 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Mitsukuni
898 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by InSpec
704 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by JJJ7
1,036 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by sensualshakti
1,942 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by MeguminShiro
228 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Dizzard
2,030 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by VicViperV
378 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by BoredQueen
64 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by MagnificentOne
83 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by Lugum
16,883 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by MjrPITA
137 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by galiane
26 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by Mayanaise
With the recent flood of bad games giveaways, asset flips, achievement spammers, etc. and the rare happening of decent bundles, I started to think how we could exclude those "games" from our daily SG browsing but yet be able to find those rare gems that even when they cost a few bucks can still provide a lot of fun. One Finger Death Punch is just one quick example.
Filtering through giveaway value or metascore can be quite unpractical, especially when browsing from different devices and mobile.
I realised that a new category that filters games based on number of Steam reviews and overall game rating, which threshold could be set by me, would quickly become my only browsed category after wishlisted.
See the images below to see how it could look like.
And have a giveaway.
Comment has been collapsed.