Counter-example
"Not Recommended
1.5 hrs on record
Definately one of the best games that comes out this entire friggin decade. 10/10, but there's one thing that I'd like to point out. The title is indeed, very, very, misleading. You can't watch dogs at all. So if you're an animal lover, this isn't the game for you. Tons of violence, and no animals."
Comment has been collapsed.
3 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by vlbastos
30 Comments - Last post 52 minutes ago by cpyd
4 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Lugum
25 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by JHartmann
1,038 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by sensualshakti
43 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by ZPE
9 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Sh4dowKill
456 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Tigerci
2,071 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by lav29
140 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by wigglenose
193 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by vlbastos
370 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by bron99
567 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by LieEater
85 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by eeev
Hey all,
Just wondering if you guys new why people keep giving "Recommended" reviews on steam, then proceed to trash the game in the review? I was looking up Watchdogs reviews (it's already out in parts of Asia), and almost every review said that the game was a sucky, broken piece of bleep, but then gave a thumbs up. Why?
An example:
Recommended
1 hrs last two weeks / 1 hrs on record
Got it installed and so far every time ive tried to play it my comp crashes :(
Comment has been collapsed.