Question on rerolls

Your position holds no nuance and frankly lacks tact and basic cordial demeanor. Down right draconian.

Please insult me, rather than the proper use of the English language. Thank you.

Rather than position or stance, you likely meant perspective. A position or stance would require me to be openly supporting a specific outlook, at the expense of another. "lacks nuance" should probably be used just for the sake of clearer reading, as that's the more common phrasing. Nuance refers to a subtle difference, intricacy, or depth. As such, you're saying my perspective lacks minor subtleties. In other words, you're saying it's straightforward, or forthright. Is that a compliment..?
Tact refers to expressing sensitivity and consideration toward others within a difficult circumstance. As an example, I could tactfully say "I haven't seen Bruce tonight" when his wife comes to the bar angrily asking for him, if I haven't in fact seen him, but know from hearsay that he's passed out drunk in the next room. Tactfully asking about your mother who is in the hospital, would involve someone asking about her in a way that is subtle enough not to emphasize her circumstances if they've gotten worse. For example, "How are things with you" versus "Hey, is your mom dead yet?". For me to lack tact, I'd basically have had to insult you, or negatively remind you of a challenging life circumstance of yours due to careless phrasing.
Cordial specifically means an attitude which warm and welcoming (the word has a similar sincerity and intent to the word "heartfelt"- the word Cordial actually means 'belonging to the heart', and indicates an openly inviting interaction)- not just being generally positive, like you seem to be implying? Or do you just have very unusual social expectations?
Demeanor is outward bearing, and while technically usable there, still implies subtle presentation [Eg, "Despite his seemingly cold demeanor, when he opened his mouth his words were warm and welcoming."]. If you intended to attack my presentation rather than assess the hidden subtleties of my personality, you would more properly have used a word such as "attitude" or "conduct".
Draconian is rather unsuitable for usage in such a manner, as the word refers to extreme, excessively harsh, and severe enforcement of something, or something persistent (eg, a policy or person) which is excessively harsh or severe by nature, and expresses such in a controlling manner. Your father could run your household in a draconian manner, a politician could promote draconian measures, a punishment could be draconian (eg, death penalty for shoplifting). Moreover, the word is essentially used exclusively to indicate something which infringes upon the freedoms, equality, or rights of others. It's really nonsensical to claim a conversation to be draconian, and it'd be an similarly absurd general assertion to make toward my conduct- for, even if true, I lack the power on this site to present myself in a manner which would suitably evidence such draconian elements.

(Edited to include reply:)

SpaceCouncil
I said it lacks tact and has NO nuance. I wasn't insulting you. I simply displayed your obedience with no exceptions.

edit: Perhaps you should learn English yourself before instructing others to do the same. A lack of something is a deficit as in a dearth not just the total and absolute absence of something. There is little different in perspective and position. it's a moot point and one I don't see the reasoning for bringing up other than to chastise. My friend. You've certainly earned the descriptor to be the least concise possible. You display your inability to be cordial rather.. condescending.. once again.

Your Position has NO NUANCE and it lacks tact, or sensitivity in regards to difficult things. Which IS draconian when speaking in regards to only using site rules as your argument against mine.

This is a community run website and thus the rules are always negotiable. This my friend is where you lack tact and are quite obedient to your draconian laws.

Cheers.