who's winner
61 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by amusedmonkey
94 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MountainWulf
46 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by LordBork
15,338 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Carenard
112 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Wok
290 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by sensualshakti
368 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by sensualshakti
166 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by pas1966
121 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by Azaltir
42 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CallMeKap
423 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Luca08062023
12 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Microfish
229 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by a19978221
5,687 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Yukiin
Thanks for the giveaway! ✔
Comment has been collapsed.
Thx you for Giveways !
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks
Comment has been collapsed.
thanks for the chance!!!
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you!
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the GA.
I want to advice that you set a minimum level for your future GAs because each one that gave one, not free, game is, at least, level 1.
Easy solution to hold the worst rulesbreakers, win resellers, autojoiner user and bots outside (40% of the level 0 accounts have infractions for unactivated or multiple wins + the ammount of used autojoiners are much more as in higher levels).
And besides that it lowers the cases of problems with your winners.
You can check accounts/your winners with:
http://www.sgtools.info/activation
http://www.sgtools.info/multiple-wins
If someone have red marks there request a reroll and put the link(s) into the support ticket.
https://www.steamgifts.com/stats/community/users
Scroll down to the bottom and look at the "per level" info and you see 970k are level 0, only around 165k have a level, 113k of them are level 1. So around 15% of the members from sg gave something and only 4% gave more as 5 games.
Have a nice day
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the game and thanks for allowing 0 level accounts to participate, unlike that guy suggestion above >.>
Comment has been collapsed.