Please, Vote also for my new game on greenlight if you like it:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=707814059
65 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by nigelt74
21 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by nvcstudent210
721 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Sardaukar
15,351 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by jahas10
298 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by hallak65
43 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by sensualshakti
1,364 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by star4you
10 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by ormax3
2,683 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Mhol1071
795 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Dvn2010
723 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by ayuinaba
210 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by CheeseNx
2,373 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by JMM72
64 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Adelion
Saw the greenlight page. I'd understand if the footage quality was hardware-limited(solution: implement a replay system and record footage outside real-time after playing a game), but blaming it on network quality gives a massive code smell.
300Kb/s is A LOT of bandwidth for games. sending 128 bit packets(more than enough information to encode a player's input) 64 times a second to 32 players only takes 256 Kib/s. A client would only need to send 8 KiB/s to the server in that scenario as well. Bandwidth(even with ADSL) shouldn't be a bottleneck.
You should take a look at Minecraft's server protocol for an example of how to implement a proper network protocol.
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks!!
Comment has been collapsed.
ᴛʜᴀɴᴋs ғᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʜᴀɴᴄᴇ :*
Comment has been collapsed.
i won, waiting the key, thx :D
Comment has been collapsed.