I'm gonna say nonadecimal. In standard decimal, the numbers are:
Comment has been collapsed.
Um...I'm not sure number 3's listed properly. I've figured out where on the number system F goes, but if I add 9 zeroes to it and translate it into decimal I get a result WAY outside the bounds of the current best estimate of the universe's age. And if I translate it into decimal and THEN add the zeroes, the result doesn't match your output on that line.
Edit: I was wrong.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
T
E
W
R
F
V
S
N
X
Comment has been collapsed.
96 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by Aetternumm
13 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by sensualshakti
50 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by anditsung
46,873 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by marilynhanson
371 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by Vodeni
38 Comments - Last post 14 hours ago by doslover
560 Comments - Last post 14 hours ago by ObsidianSpire
20 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Mitsukuni
70 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by lav29
932 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Level4
45 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by ThatDave
50 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by noSim
3 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by Golwar
733 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by Bum8ara5h
That correctly posts this number system
(including the numbers in order 1 2 3 4 etc)
discuss / argue / cooperate openly here - I apologize♠ in advance...
FACTS:
in 42T Columbus sailed the ocean blue
there are FEN feet in a mile
the universe is supposedly over VWE10S85 years old (that's a F with 9 0s)
Christmas is always on Dec 16
a ton is 5T5 pounds
after 1X comes 20 (don't get confused - there's nothing hidden here)
2FW - 16 = 2R6
Comment has been collapsed.