Well it would add another layer of protection, also I guess that a guess limit could apply to them before they are blocked from the private giveaway, that would make brute forcing any such giveaway pointless.
Comment has been collapsed.
Perhaps allow only a limited number of attempts to answer the question every <interval...say 10 hours>, a number that is generous for human comprehension, but shuts out the "bruteforcing" programs to prevent the majority of the harm from hammering the site with requests.
Comment has been collapsed.
That would be foolproof...but, man, that could be a huge burden on the gifter. I wonder how many gifters would prefer that to the current system.
Comment has been collapsed.
Suggesting...
While entering private giveaways, send a messege to the creator, if the creator allows, the user's in, if denied, page will be invalid to that user.
Comment has been collapsed.
46,867 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by FranckCastle
26 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by JonathanDoe
3 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by philipdick
1,454 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by MaxLevch
21 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by Warriot
1,169 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by IDoKnowJack
6 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by canis39
674 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by AnarcoPunkRJ
51 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Kappaking
64 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by PicoMan
48 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by s4k1s
206 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Cygone
2 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by xxxka
138 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by Cjcomplex
I have an idea. If you will create a giveaway you can make a question protecting a giveaway. Exempli gratia:
"What is my name" or "What is the password?"
I am waiting for suggestions.
Have a nice day
Abysanik
Comment has been collapsed.