Didn't knew that one, I use Aurora.
But anyway, thanks for Skyrim :p
Comment has been collapsed.
-1
there are different users who have different workflows, so there is neither a perfect nor a best browser. There is only one which suites the own wishes the best. I like to customize my browser a lot through plugins, registry tweaks, etc. so therefore Firefox (or it's Alpha since I like testing) is best for me. According to this my browser is unique as it could be, no one has the same fingerprint as mine.
Comment has been collapsed.
I have Chrome and my fingerprint is also unique according to that site. What it means however, is that you're easier to track down.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm sorry, I lent them to my terrorist friend. Dunno why he wanted it...
You can have it as soon as he gives it back to me.
Comment has been collapsed.
Regarding the fact that Pale Moon is 4-5 months behind the current official version, I would be a bit worried about security breaches...
Comment has been collapsed.
but it is a fork of Firefox and has therefore most its flaws. If Firefox has a bug it is very likely Pale Moon has it too.
Comment has been collapsed.
Pale Moon is kept up to date with all current security fixes, even if the actual version number doesn't match that of Firefox. It only gets updated to a new full version number when significant desirable changes reach the Firefox release builds.
Comment has been collapsed.
ah, thanks for the info.
how good is the add-on compatibility? I need several add-ons to be in sync to their counterpart in Firefox on my Ubuntu-PC at work.
Comment has been collapsed.
I've never had any problems myself, though I've seen talk of some add-ons that don't work on rebranded builds of Firefox for whatever reason and it seems some add-ons rely on features from Firefox 21 onwards. You can check here to see if anyone has flagged up any issues lately.
Comment has been collapsed.
since Mozilla changed the development/version structure to some kind of rolling release, it's version number is irrelevant. There is only one version maintained and thats the main branch. Then there are the development branches Aurora and Beta - thats all. Furthermore these branches are shifted every six weeks (aurora becomes beta, beta becomes main), so every shift a new number as a version number is not that brilliant...
Comment has been collapsed.
Totally agree, I really dislike the ever changing number. At first I thought it was just to "catch up" to all the other browsers numbers cause I heard some people thought FF wasn't as good cause it was a much newer browser and silly stuff like that. Again silly reason to keep changing the browser number but I've seen sillier things done.
What ever the reasons for them to go like they are, I wish they would stop and just go back to the 1 full version number a year.
Comment has been collapsed.
Chrome. Long time Firefox user but for the last 1-2 years it has been mainly Chrome.
I do have Firefox installed as some add-on's don't work that well in Chrome for some reason so if I need to check some special stuff I start up my trusty fox.
Chrome though reading tests should be faster, has flash installed and is an overall well done Google product and seems to have a good team behind it.
Comment has been collapsed.
86 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by devotee
15,573 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by devotee
563 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by XxSeRyIxX
366 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by UltraMaster
26 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by pripkun
81 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by indio68
47 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by shortcakey
22 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by gorok
5,819 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Evilicious
15,312 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by cpj128
140 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by puninup
26,771 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by FranckCastle
198 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by m0r1arty
16 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Gwynevere
I'm using Pale Moon.
$.01 CV required.
Comment has been collapsed.