If they put exactly same giveaway conditions then indeed it doesn't make any sense, but that's up to giveaway creator and his/her preferences. They don't receive any benefits from creating giveaways like this, apart from forcing people interested in all copies to pay price multiplied by number of copies they want to join for.
This might be the only valid reason for doing it like this, but I doubt that anybody actually creates those giveaways for this reason - they simply don't know or don't want to know.
Comment has been collapsed.
With single copy giveaways, you can easily skim down your giveaway list and see who's marked it and who hasn't. With multiple copy giveaways, it waits until every single winner has marked it before there's any indicator that any of them got it. I like to follow up and make sure the game gets activated, so multi-copy giveaways actually make things a little more of a hassle for me in the end.
Comment has been collapsed.
458 Comments - Last post 41 seconds ago by szabe
46,855 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by mozila80
1,441 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by ekees
15,443 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Aradiel
56 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by Gamy7
239 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by pb1
559 Comments - Last post 23 hours ago by svecka
50 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by Shurraxxo
108 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by NymCast
2,316 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by omarhafez
354 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Swordoffury
2,399 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by JMM72
134 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by nigelt74
93 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Kashart
I see many public giveaways for the same games made by the same person. They are all the same level too (mostly level 0 or 1). They all start and end at the same time. Why do people do this rather than use the "number of copies" function? Is there an advantage to doing them this way or is it that these people don't understand how the function works?
Comment has been collapsed.