1 hour giveaways are not fair either. It's almost exactly the same situation: if you don't come here in time, you will miss it. If you are sleeping or hanging out with friends, you will miss it. I for one don't see anything against the above suggestion, but I guess it was discussed before and the staff didn't like the idea.
Comment has been collapsed.
It is only your problem if you miss it. If missing them is such a problem for you, stock yourself with food and water and be on SG.com 24/7.
If a BUS arrives at 10am and leaves at 10.15am, it is not the drivers problem if you are sleeping. If you have a job meeting between 1pm and 2pm, it is not other attendees problem if you are boinking your secretary in the supply room. If you have an exam between 8am and 9.30am, its not your proffessor's problem if you are lost in a forrest because of a massive hangover.
Comment has been collapsed.
Buses, job meetings and exams (and indeed, even secretaries) tend to have schedules, so you know when you are supposed to stop drinking. :-)
Comment has been collapsed.
Excuse me, but what's your point here? I didn't say it's a problem for me, just wanted to point out that 1 hour giveaways are not so different from entry-limited giveaways. And if you read my last sentence, you can see I have NOTHING against them. Thanks for the advices though.
Comment has been collapsed.
yeah that's nice idea! possibility to let enter for example 100 people or 10 or smth seems nice D:
Comment has been collapsed.
And who exactly would benefit from this, if I may ask? (In contributor giveaways, it's the contributors. In group giveaways, it's the people who share a group with you. In private giveaways, it's your friends or puzzle solvers. So, who is it in this case? If you are suggesting this option, you surely have a clear idea of it.)
Comment has been collapsed.
Ah, I see. I always thought these labels have rather negative connotations, something not exactly associated with "I want my game to go to primarily to this kind of users".
Comment has been collapsed.
People that live in the same timezone.
Also people that visit this site more often.
Ideas like this would make this site more fun and thrilling in my opinion. Ofcourse winning something is great and gifting a game feels nice, but entering 1,000 giveaways, forgetting about them and just hoping that a green message will appear is rather boring
Comment has been collapsed.
OH LOOK IT'S THIS THREAD AGAINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN.
No.
Comment has been collapsed.
There are ads at this site? Should have disabled AdBlock for this website.
Comment has been collapsed.
yeah you should really. i think the advertising is PERFECT on this site, its generally for games that are going cheap on steam or greenman ect, which is bscly the lifeblood of this site, and you know its targeted without any kind of googlespiderevil, and people who use this site are actually likely to click on the products and buy it. this site and its ad's could be a in first year marketing degree case study.
Comment has been collapsed.
If so there should be an option to sort by closest time limit. With the amount of giveaways going on it's virtually impossible to keep track otherwise...
Just saiyan.
Comment has been collapsed.
This was suggested a couple of months back. I'm not a fan of the idea. It would make it too easy to make troll puzzles.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hey guize, y no allso havu 0 puints givawaiz eet wud b helereous to hav skai reemz gimmeawai fre off puins
Comment has been collapsed.
they have this on playblink, some of their raffles are capped at so many entries. nice idea. but will it work with so many members?
Comment has been collapsed.
who the fuck would make a bot for this site?
They have in the past. I don't know how many there currently are or if they solved that problem somehow, but do you really think they would pass up the chance if we started having giveaways with 100 max entries or less?
Comment has been collapsed.
56 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Gamy7
239 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by pb1
1,440 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by FranckCastle
46,853 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by whitepai
454 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by FranckCastle
15,440 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by MarvashMagalli
559 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by svecka
102 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by WickedVisage
15,199 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Adzik
2,313 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Atro
116 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by Karfein
31 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by icaio
96 Comments - Last post 56 minutes ago by Almostn33t
122 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Atro
in addition to having a minimum amount of giveaways, why not also have a MAXIMUM number of entries for a giveaway. it would create tension as if you dont see a giveaway in time you wont get to enter it, it would also make for humorous giveaways, like 5 people maximum entries and 4 copies of the game. it would also provide an incentive to check all the different pages of giveaways as someone might put up a AAA title with say 100 maximum entries but it lasts several weeks.
in short it would add a new dimension to giveaways, encourage people to check the site all the time, more clicks = more ads or something right?
thoughts?
Comment has been collapsed.