267 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by PsyKo
15,526 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by adam1224
46,884 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Zolivv
55 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by zenarcher
15 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Jinbe
64 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Liandri
297 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by shearkvis
9,029 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
78 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by alpshrk
127 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by stogle
37 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by alpshrk
2,435 Comments - Last post 52 minutes ago by s4k1s
149 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Filipi
69 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by PeacefulAnarchy
I think it would be a more accurate representation over time to have the "Y" axis be CV itself perhaps with additional notation to show the levels at the same time, rather than the discrete levels themselves. Because the levels are closer to an exponential scale, there is very little change shown as the user levels, even for rather significant additions to the contributor value. This of course would be a small change on the whole, and admittedly, few people would benefit, but I think it would be a nice improvement, if there is the time and ability to do so.
Comment has been collapsed.