Why do you dislike the new system?
Remember Horse Armor those 10 years ago. Now look at DLC market this days.
Will same thing happen to modding? Well, apparently if you use free version of Midas Magic, every time you use new spell you get pop-up "buy me".
And then there's cut - while it might be nice for one-person-mods (which will be majority), big mods will not really get much popularity, unless they will be sold for crumpets (lets face it - we mod games because it's free). Big mods will need to split those 25% between many creators, which means less money per person, and since mod will be expensive, how many people will buy it?
Comment has been collapsed.
This guys post sums it up for me, it'll basically ruin the modding. And of course the whole 25% to the modder.
http://steamcommunity.com/app/72850/discussions/0/611704730319151037/
Comment has been collapsed.
16 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Mayanaise
1 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by UnbakedBacon
15 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by AwesomePossum50
24 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by OneManArmyStar
260 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sensualshakti
24 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by UnbakedBacon
1,092 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by FreeFall
144 Comments - Last post 10 seconds ago by CSLocura
31 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by Gigant250
868 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by Tongle
97 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by SirSage
45 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by s4k1s
143 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Peiperissimus
47 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by blalilulelo
I'm not a big fan of the system either, but I don't think it's that bad. In my opinion, the amount the modder receives is a bit unfair. Well, Valve gets its 30%, fine. But when the developer is allowed to say they'll get 20% more than the modder... not fair. The minimum proportion the modder gets should be 35% and if the developer is kind, he might even earn more.
I don't think it's a big deal that the modder can set the minimum price to a number bigger than 0, but a pay-what-you-want system could also be nice (0$ would always be an option, too).
What do you think? Why do you dislike the new system? Or do you even dislike it?
Comment has been collapsed.