Let me quote one of my previous reroll ticket responses here:
"The 1 month clause only applies when the winner has already served their suspension. If they have not yet been suspended for a game they have won, a reroll will be approved no matter how old it is."
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you for that as I wasn't 100% sure about this. :-)
So in the end it never hurts to ask SG support for a re-roll as giveaway creators have no way of knowing if a winner that has non-activated games has already been suspended or not.
Comment has been collapsed.
13 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Jinbe
64 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Liandri
297 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by shearkvis
15 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by BrunoTheLizard
2,179 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by rashidnemar
54 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Pika8
15,524 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Birtchy
33 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by IbetheTOP
1,107 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by Vasharal
2,348 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by nellyneko
7,157 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by Swordoffury
148 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by escollo
140 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Myrsan
26,705 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ManOman
What difference does it make which month the non-activated wins are, if the person hasn't been reported yet?
In other words, if someone has unactivated wins from last month, but no one ever reported them, but then someone discovers them this month, is it too late? Is there some kind of statute of limitations on rule violations?
Comment has been collapsed.