Recently I bought Fallout 4 physical copy, cause I know it gonna be a big size game.
Turn out the physical copy only contain about 20% of data, so it still need to download the rest 80% of data.

Bethesda says that this is to protect against piracy,
while if we search internet Bethesda games still pirated since the day it released.
They say they did it for the past 10 years and they says they don't have problem with that a lot of people still buy it.

Physical copy for big game is actually very helpful for people in countries with under average internet speed and high cost.
Even if people still buy it don't mean that they don't have problem. I think no need to boast the sales figure.
The most important is they slap legit users in the face, but the pirates still roam free smuggling their goods.

8 years ago

Comment has been collapsed.

What do you think about physical copy not contain most of the game data?

View Results
I agree, physical copy should have little data as possible.
Neutral, I don't have problem with it.
Physical copy should have most of the data, either for our back up or help users with slow internet connection.

I personally don't have a problem with it, though I didn't vote for that. What pisses me off are day one patches that are bigger than the game download itself.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This. I prefer games not to be released on schedule than having unstable huge day one hotfixes.
Also, as much as I think physical copies of almost everything in the entertainment field (games, music, series/movies) is going to become what LP is now for music, I think they should be exactly what they are: a physical playable copy of a digitally distributed game (I'd like them to be DRM free too, but that's considered madness sadly).
It makes no sense to distribute a launcher on disk.

And again, for real, I don't care about releases on schedule, just bring good PC games/ports and take your time...

About the piracy thing, I remember reading an extremely interesting interview with CD Project Red CEO (The Witcher games and GOG.com) about DRMs and how they actually hurt your revenues and/or company name, screwing legitimate customers.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

not bought a physical copy since mw2 so i don't know much about how it works, but it would make sense that most of the data was on the disc.
and i don't really see how making you have to download most of the content is gonna prevent pirates.
then again i don't have a cd-tray on my pc anyways so i can't buy physical copies <.<

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It only have 1 DVD,
it have steam game installer, so when you click install it automatically connect to steam and install in steam default game folder.
It only copy 5 GB from DVD the rest 20 GB need to download.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

yeah read about that on the fallout 4 steam forums, yeah that doesn't really make sense ._.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

WTF... they didnt even use a dual layer for 8gb!?

they could at least do 2 dual layer discs like GTA4, resulting in 16gb

but also, optical media is not good, we need games on little 32gb flash drives instead (since bluray is not & will not be a thing for pc)

edit: the physical copy not having all files was announced before release

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Dunno if single or dual layer DVD, but it only contain 5 GB.
I think it is the time we use blue ray drive,
http://www.newegg.com/Blu-Ray-Drives/SubCategory/ID-598
It's not that expensive and it's more cozy.
I think Bethesda just don't want most of their games data on physical copy.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

bethesda aside, nobody wants optical media as it is slow & takes up space

people arent going to get bluray drives unless they can easily play bluray movies the same as dvds using simple media players without hdcp... but they cant, it sounds like a nightmare, might as well get a $50 standalone player with hdmi-out instead of a $50 pc drive

it's also not too bad to use 8gb dvds... 4 of them make 32gb, that's the same as the cd to dvd transition where games like unreal tournament 2004 were on 4 or 5 cds, it's still a small amount of games that go past 30gb

edit: another interesting thing is even some launch ps4 games let you play them while they were installing more data from the disc, it would be cool to have digital games do the same.. download the beginning of the game, continue getting the rest while playing

edit2: personally, people need to stop being impatient, so my only concern with downloads is if the customer has a bandwidth cap

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"it's still a small amount of games that go past 30gb"

That's going to change within the year or so. Welcome to the new generation.
More and more will show up as higher-resolution textures etc. are becoming the industry norm now, thanks to the current gen of consoles being able to handle them as well. And those are the things that really eat space nowadays.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

but many people are on smallish SSDs, keep in mind i said 30gb not 7gb of last gen, that works for 4 dvds or more than a single layer bluray (25gb, dual layer is 50gb)

the 'new generation' is 2 years old, the consoles are still with 500gb editions full of other games, witcher3 barely goes past at 35gb requirements

last gen consoles can handle the same thing, killzone3 & uncharted3 were over 40gb each, every intelligent engine should be streaming data, even the new consoles have under 8gb usable ram & vram

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I have 100 KB/s Internet so 20 GB takes 3-4 days sometimes if I leave the downloading device on constantly. If I buy a physical copy, it had better not make me download most of the game, especially one that large. That isn't a physical copy then.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

that reply was more about OP's bluray suggestion & my gripe with people being so impatient that they skip work, make a tent in line at a store, freak out if multiplayer is offline on the first hour, etc

my previous reply suggested using flash drives, i'm not saying abandon physical copies

(ignoring the bethesda issue) for downloads in general, i had 700KB/s until last year, along with your 100 some years earlier, as long as there is a fair cap or an unlimited period, it simply takes longer, why do i need a luxury game 'now'? a lot of games also seem to have a preload period

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1 Flash drives for physical copies, sadly might boost prices by$20 tho

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Neither I have problem with it, it's been a decade since I've bought any physical copy, and aswell have high internet speed, but I agree that "Physical copy should have most of the data, either for our back up or help users with slow internet connection."

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's not a physical copy if you need to download data to even start the game.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

this is what i think about it....it should have working game on disc, not only part

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Agreed, I don't care if you need steam to play it, as long as it just installs the entire game from the disc.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

For Dragon Age: Inquisition, I bought the physical copy, both because it was slightly cheaper than a digital copy (and I got a free poster with it), and my internet speed isn't very fast. It was very useful for me, because I did not want to wait even longer to play DA:I.
I don't have Fallout 4, because my poor laptop cannot run it, but I do not like that it only has a small part of the data. Ughhh.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Imo, physical copy should have all the data in terms that it is supposed to have the game files as a local backup.
And you say only 20% of the total amount? That's way to little.

PS. I wish I could add my physical copied games into my Steam library. Only 10% of them have been accepted and another 10% were duplicated due to older Steam account, which I don't remember :[

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Waste of ressources to burn them to physical media. But Bethesda in general is pure evil.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, it's still better than MGS5, where the disc only contained the steam installer.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's just sad. Things like that shouldn't be legal.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It should just be clearly stated on the box. A retail copy is something I can install and play on a desert island with a Diesel generator.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

All Steam games have text saying online connection & steam account required (Valve requires this).

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

True. So by my logic there are no retail copies of Steamworks games.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There is no point of having a physical copy if it doesnt work. Last physical copy i bought was Starcraft:: wings of liberty a few years ago.I stopped doing that since its worthless. Aside from the nice looking case, i cant play the game offline, in case i just want to play solo. I mean, blizzard updated the game after and then you can play it offline, but i think you have to download that patch, so.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't see what's the point of physical copy if you'll still need to download most of the game. That just doesn't make any sense.

And I am so sick about the "it's to prevent piracy" excuses from developers and publishers. They can't prevent piracy, they just make things inconvenient for their customers, people who actually buy the game. Which is actually counterproductive because it makes a lot of people disappointed and more willing to pirate the game instead of buying it.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This. Box version should contain full game because every game will be cracked up - so this "fight with piracy" is cheap excuse to be greedy and don't want to pay extra for few more DVDs (per box).

The only way of preventing game of being cracked up is to keep some of the data on devs server and send it to local PCs when game is played - just like in Diablo III. But it's not the case in Fallout 4.

Devs want to know how far they can get with this bullshit, I'm afraid that at some point they will sell "box version" with just cover plastic box and piece of cardboard inside with steam code - without DVDs, manual etc.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That has been going on for years,so it's not exactly some future plan of theirs…

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I totally agree. Game devs should not worry about piracy. Everything they do to prevent piracy, just works against the convenience of the paying customer. If they really want to prevent piracy, they should just make awesome games, without worrying about pirates. They should just make the games worth the money for everyone. Ofcourse even that won't fully prevent it, but it is a start.

I have seriously not seen a single (AAA) game that has not been pirated. I don't get why devs don't see that...

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The point of physical copy on PC nowadays, like it or not, is not to piss GameStop off. The day the big players think they can afford to turn GS into an enemy, they will go all digital.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why? Isn't it retail shop like any other?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, I would say it's the one heavyweight retail player that matters. And they make most of their profits from used games, so the more the system goes digital, the less money they make.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Pretty much every PC game right now comes with steam / ubi / rockstar social club / origin drm, so they can't be re-sold either way.

You can sell used games just when they are on consoles.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Also true. PC retail copies leave some money in the shop, at least. So we can say the reason consoles are behind in terms of going digital is... not to piss Game Stop off!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

if fo4 update new patch , the physical disk data maybe no useful

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Physical copies should have died out years ago. Even the peasants could just get a larger hard drive and go cloud only. Too bad that apparently even most parts of the rich West have terrible internet connection. (And for a long time I thought my 23-Euro 115/10 plan was slow.)

As for your actual problem: if they sell you a game disk, it should be the game's disk, not a downloader application. Considering how cheap Bethesda is, I'm not surprised that they used the cheapest single-layer dvd they could order in bulk, but I'm not sure that you couldn't even sue them in Murica or in the EU for misleading advertisement and labelling.
This is slightly less bad than Capcom's favourite practise on consoles, disk-locked content, where you already bought the game, bust you cannot access parts of your legally purchased media unless you pay additional fees to unlock it. (Don't worry, Bethesda will never do that, they rush out games long before any DLC is made.)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

DRM-Free games are the best.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 months ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A shame DRM free games aren't usually big ticket items sold on physical media to begin with. Part of the reason people are so pissed off with this to begin with is because there are still plenty of places in this day and age with data caps below 100gb. I myself live in one such area. The provider that holds the monopoly in this area recently instated a 15gb cap on their overloaded always-less-than-1.5mb service with a greedy overage fee that they 'claim' caps at $20, or 10gb over, but most likely does not, and have expressly stated they have no intention of upgrading the infrastructure.

This forced my family to move over to a mobile provider. We get 100gb now and far superior download speeds, but overage is $5 per gig. You might imagine how this sort of thing can be a problem in a household shared by three internet users, eh?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If this what they call a physical copy, why not just sell boxes with steam key stickers inside of it instead of discs?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 months ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They have been doing that for years. All my C&C games after C&C3 were sold as a dvd box with a single sticker in it for an EA DM (Origin's precursor).

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I am +20 year gamer and feel bad about the extinction of physical copies. I still keep some of the floppies i bought..
Digital copies are more profitable for the distrubutors and thats the only reason they want to stop selling physical copies. Excuse of preventing piracy is just bullshit..

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

More profitable? They are the same price, but it has to go to the local publisher, then the wholesale distributor, then the local stores, and they all have profit. With digital market, you have the publisher and the distributor or console manufacturer. (Granted, the latter ones use insane fees: platform fee, distribution fee, online distribution fee, and my favourite, patching fee.)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That is the Early Access "BETA State" excuse - MGSV PP had like a 50 MB Installer on the Retail Disk ... kinda
funny assuming everyone & everywhere has access to limitless and moderately fast Internet.

A.: The full darn game in whatever petty state should be on the Disk, but their afraid since until
that crap has been shipped out to you the Early Access Beta has already evolved and requiring Updates lol.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The discs should have all the data on it, but in the end it doesn't really matter, you'll have to download patches for it and sometimes they are quite large. I bought a physical copy of The witcher 3, installed it using dvds but I had to download a 15 gb patch anyway and the game is a lil over 30 gb, so it's pretty much half of the game.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

it should have working game on disc, not only part

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't like the fact that they make you use Steam, it gives Steam a monopoly more and more.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They need some form of DRM, and Steam is the most convenient and widespread.
Still better than StarForce or shudder Tagés.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because there are no Steam games you can torrent?

edit: Just checked tpb and its on #1 on pc games ;)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Steam games are generally easy to torrent, since they only need a SteamApi.DLL crack, and maybe an EXE crack. It's not really about protection, since if someone wants to pirate a game, they will do it anyway. Even if it is on consoles.

It really is just a convenience. Steam offers DRM + distribution in one neat package, and it has a huge user base to show for itself. Heck, even UbiSoft and EA use Steam to sell games, even though they need you to use their own clients to start the game. And so far the only store that offers distribution + own client for its users, is GOG, and they only sell games if they are DRM free. Most AAA publishers will never agree to that.
(Well, Big Fish Games has its own distribution and built-in DRM too, but they deal strictly in casual games. Strange enough, Steam is slowly edging its way to some of its business, as HOGs and time/resource management games are getting big on Steam too.)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Physical copy is what it implies - pull the disk out of the box, install the game, and play. That's how physical copies were made when I last checked. My last physical copy was Witcher 2 Enhanced Edition. Installed and played without downloading even 1 Mb of data.

This situation is double bullshit because of Bethesda's "against piracy" justification. It not even "borderline" stupid. As someone with few years of experience in downloading games using torrents... Stuff is there before release, regardless if the game is distributed physically or digitally.

It's just... Ugh...

View attached image.
8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In reality, it's to save costs, not due to piracy. (Steam discs are encrypted & missing exe, so good luck pirates)

Edit: Also Bethesda said it uses Steam to prevent piracy. Only having one disc is separate issue.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

None of this will prevent piracy :)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And publishers will never get it.

Denuvo will for few days

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In fact, I wasn't even interested in this game, but reading about this stupidity, the parrot on my shoulder says I should use my one good eye to find a copy online just to spite that silly company. Sure beats hopping to the store on my one good leg.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Only 20%? Woah, that sucks! Having a really bad internet connection myself, I know exactly what you're talking about.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I also buy physical copies here in South Africa as my internet is super shit. An example. I bought Shadow of Mordor GOTY yesterday. My friend had the disks from when the game came out (there were 5 disks, took forever to install :p). So I used those, and only ended up having to download 7 gigs (most of which is the season pass content, which took 10 hours) instead of 50 gigs.

Bethesda are being stupid not putting the data on the disk. Metal Gear Solid V did the same, they only put a steam installer on the disk. They could put all the data on, but leave the .exe application file out, and pirates wouldn't be able to unlock the game early. Instead the pirates just use a VPN, and cracked the Steam files. Another example, I bought The Witcher 3 earlier in the year. That had all the content on the disk except the .exe, and it was DRM Free and used GOG. Bethesda have no excuse.

Too long, didn't read: Bethesda are idiots and don't know how modern piracy works. Good job fucking over the people who bought your game at retail. Why even bother with a retail copy if you're only going to put 5 gigs on the disk?

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And also a physical copy for collection !

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I liked game boxes when they came on well... boxes, cardboard boxes, with some design tough put into them, a proper manual or maybe extra writing about the game itself, and then the games off course.

This time boxes are just a hunk of plastic with a DVD in then, hardly call it worth while over a Digital copy, and the "especial" editions that come with all the stuff you would want to collect cost quite a lot more...

Frankly my dear i don't give a damn, i buy all my games digitally :P

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.