參加即表示您同意當此KEY無法兌換時本人可刪除此抽獎。
祝好運。
Please allow me to delete this giveaway in case the key is not working.
Have fun!
187 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by kbronct
10 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by lostsoul67
39 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Cloverleaf
0 Comments - Created 2 hours ago by Wok
3,113 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by romana1994
83 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by romana1994
1,085 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Konsterter
172 Comments - Last post 1 second ago by djsmokey001
83 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by Yoku
675 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by Tsykino
109 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Swordoffury
135 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by Gutiresma
2,393 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by JMM72
36 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Swordoffury
I've been asking some GA creators around, kind of a survey approach; why does it matter that you delete the GA instead of just letting the winner mark as not received?
There are no repercussions for this, nor for a high rate of received versus not received. Why do you prefer that the GA is deleted if you cannot provide a replacement key?
Comment has been collapsed.
I'll venture a guess :)
On a more personal note, i assume it just feels bad having "failed" giveaways, and it's nicer to have a 100% giveaway rate.
On a more practical note, I believe some closed groups require that you have a "clean record", as in, all giveaways that you won must be redeemed, and I suspect some groups have rules regarding not having giveaways marked as "not received".
Comment has been collapsed.
Sure, it's nice to have that rate (albeit a bit futile if you ask me; should you give to have some number popping up or should you give to make others happy?), but if one chooses to provide keys from shady sites or other sites that may expire their keys, that's a risk to take. That's the reason I never give away such keys here; I either go to other sites or just drop them in random places for people to find.
As for the closed groups, I believe you are then still circumventing/violating the rule groups by hiding your non-received keys.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's inaccurate. Consequences are:
1. If you run a significant streak of Not Receiveds, or if you run enough total Not Receiveds, or if you run a high enough ratio of Not Receiveds (especially as a new account), staff will put you on Indefinite Suspension until you've cleared up some of your NRs.
2. If someone glances at your profile or hovers over your sent ratio, and notices sufficient NRs to go against their personal preferences, they may blacklist you.
3. Groups may restrict entry based on NR status, and I believe SGTools filters can also be configured to restrict against such.
4. It's sufficiently annoying to be bothersome, especially to those with organizational compulsions.
(Yarik did already mention a couple of these while I was typing this up; Apologies for the repetition.)
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you!
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you!
Comment has been collapsed.