So AshenOne started a topic with a good intention, that actually got people talking, but of-course by "nature", this was going nowhere for the simple fact most people don't even have the basis of culture, knowledge, science and experience to even understand the F they're talking about.

First a memo on what different terms mean

1. Biological Sexes define the starting chromosomic make-up, hormonale orientation and reproductive organs you come with, aka whether you are biologically a male or female which has not much to do with being a "man" or a "woman", with a few medical exceptions.

2. Genders has almost nothing to do with sexes, yet is biological, specifically neuronal and psychological. It defines who you are or feel (because as complex humans goes, it sometimes takes time or struggle to find yourself) as an individual sexual being. You can be a heterosexual male who feels like a "woman" who likes females who are dominant or bisexual. Yeah that get's complicated, yet it's the cold truth: if it exists, then it is. The problem is that this concept is so complex because it actually defines people as millions of possible unique sexual individuality (a term I prefer for gender), that SJW have complete fucked with, while having no idea the fuck they talk about.

3. Sexual Orientation: defines your attraction, not only to whom but also to what or how you're attracted, so not just to people but also situations, roles, types of personalities, fetishes, cuddling etc...here again it's very complicated because like hormones or genders, it can fluctuate over time. You could be a dumb hetero-male who just like a good ball-emptying one day, and realise you want to dress as a furrie to enjoy sex the next.

So for short, we are defined amongst other things by S.G.O. factors, but this can get as complex as there are many people, tendencies and possibilities. Pokemon SGO: gotta catch'em all!

Now the problem is we're not remotely living in a future society based around precisely what makes human unlike animals, which is that being your own self as a unique individual is more important, therefor there's a generalised equality because only what you achieve and how you emancipate yourself as an individual person matters, in fact feminisms, lgbtqis and other SJWs have ruined any chance for us to get there in the coming decade.

However we live in a VERY imperfect and retarded society, that is not much more advanced that 1000 y.o. because, and this is the actual theme of the topic: we are not really prisoners of nature anymore (not exactly), but we are prisoner of the way our overall society defines itself and things in general, which we call human conditions. And some of these conditions cater to an extremely popular theme, which is the feminine (NOT female) condition, and the one nobody gives a shit about, the masculine condition.

The Masculine Condition

1. Downward Emasculation - When you're a kid and then a teen (sometimes older) you grow-up on either one of the two faces of emasculation: you are what I consider to be morally/psychologically abused by older women into getting a completely biased, involuntarily sexist, fetishisation of women as being special little flower you have to be arbitrarily -nicer, respectful and attentional with. The classic result is growing-up being lonely and miserable, because of course no women want to have to do with nice guys, until you become self-conscious enough to ask yourself why (though some men never get out of that state, some, by intimidation, depression and general fragility, revert back to it, older male feminists for exemple), and in fact ask yourself a deeper question: but who or how should I be? That's where you evolve towards a second, more subtle and independent (as in it's your responsibility) state, if you didn't already grew-up in that culture because of older men:

2. Upward Emasculation -So this is going to seem counter-intuitive, especially for backwards/alt-right reactionaries, but it isn't. The whole precept of "masculinity" is based on a general idea that, whether we grow-up to be nice guys or coward assholes first, being a man means that you have to A. "succeed" in a broad general sense, on the surface to be "someone" or to get money, this or that material things, but deeper really to get women, and B. that as a man, you don't have a right to complain, be sensitive or seen as "weak", or even be a victim (again we're talking about men with a minimum of self-consciousness, not hypocrites wimp although the following will apply to them as well), and for the very same deeper reason that you "have" to succeed: not to ruin your chance of getting women, or rather be emasculated.

   • But the truth, the more subtle one, is that this masculine condition (like the feminine condition), is exactly another kind of emasculation which makes men miserable and pulls them away from actually being "accomplished" the way you can truly be: by becoming who you really are, the best yourself, which means you have to emancipate yourself from normative rules which makes you an influenceable nobody, which means you have to first understand and find who you truly are. The masculine condition like any other arbitrary conditioning is what drives men to pursue stupid, superficial, material goals whatever they might be, which they actually mostly don't succeed unless by becoming miserable losers, to engage in violent, social, moral or physical competition on a mediocre scale, and finally constantly pretend and adopt attitude that are no their true self to cater to women criterias and desire, further echoed by other men who are prisoner of that condition. That's why the only way to become a man is

3. Male Emancipation - Euphras said "one is not born a man, one becomes one" which has been the defining punchline of the meaning of becoming an emancipated individual human, way beyond the original question asked to him which was "how does one turns into a successful/accomplished man" (De Beauvoir later made it universal by responding to the question of feminine condition by concluding in Second Sex "one is not born a woman, one becomes one", which today's feminists completely desecrated and pissed on, going backwards instead). Being a man means not being emasculated against your own drives, expressions and ambitions as a man, but it also means not being weak-minded, diverted and emprisoned by the other form of emasculation which is "virilism" or as some call it "toxic masculinity". But there's only one way to do that because as I describe above, if men have one single complete weakness which drives their huge cowardliness today, it's the dependance from women's approval and desire.

   • Why did the feminist movement become so successful? Because men have a big mouth to talk about anything, from games, to politics or science and philosophy, but if there's one thing that makes them drop their balls and shit their spine, it's women. No (sane) man would want to be ridiculed or intimidate by saying something against feminists or women in general, and more importantly none would want to see their chance of getting with a women threatened by a controversial position against feminism? Well, that's exactly what emasculation means in it's widest most common form, and emprisons men in those superficial "masculinity" criterias or attitudes which are the opposite of being a true, emancipated, human individual. As you can see this requires something very difficult and counter-intuitive: the first step to becoming a true independent and emancipated man, is to not care or even consider women's judgement, and more than judgements (since this can easily be diverted from "I don't care" to "I pretend not to care, but I'm behaving consciously/unconsciously exactly the way I know it'll attract them"), from women's approval/desire. Which is pretty fucking hard of course, whether you are lonely (harder), or in a relationship (as hard depending on the situation).

And all this is not in spite or distrust of women, this is actually because their own feminine "prison" conditions them to have these judgements, attitudes but also counter-intuitive and anti-emancipating desires/criterias (which feminism made worse, again I make this precision so people reading this will understand that what will happen in a few years and is starting to happen, is not just because of reactionary rejection but because this movement actually set the backwards ground for these reactions).

tl;dr: learn to fucking read.