Ouch 68/100

Nope. I'm never buying a game that requires a regular subscription.

Wait for the F2P.

Nope, too expensive for me.

no

I'll get it when it goes free to play

Nah, played the beta and wasn't impressed.

now wait for paidreviews.com(aka gamespot/ign) to review it

This game should be at least buy to play, but for less price than now since current price for standard version without subscription is overpriced.

never intended to get it.

No way. Especially the way they treat their customers repels me.

Never even remotely considered to, even if I'm a fan of TES.

:/ Own the Retail Imperial Edition :/

Nop
Instead of getting an elder scrolls game and adding mmo elements to it, they got a regular boring mmo and disguised it as elder scrolls...
Also subsciption

I pre-ordered it and I haven't regretted my decision yet.

When I log in I can always find something interesting to do. It's probably my favourite MMO based of what I've done so far, and that's saying something as I've played quite a few. That's not to say the game is faultless, far from it. There are still numerous bugs, but nothing gamebreaking thankfully. Really it's tough to judge an MMO after a couple of weeks, the true test is if I am still subscribed in six months time, and the reason why I am.

I wasn't planning to get it anyway...i thought i would wait for beta and get an idea...and after playing the beta i came out really disappointed. I don't think i'll play it even if it does go f2p.

I don't care about some arbitrary score. But they are triple (or even quadruple) dipping a fairly run of the mill MMO, so no thanks.
Full retail price + monthly fee + micro store with items affecting gameplay + locking content behind a pre-order paywall.

to be fair that endless war nobody wins bit is kinda the point of the 3 faction system

Meh. I don't like Skyrim too. Witcher 2 is much better.

the game has a full buy price followed by monthly subscriptions and on top of that microtransactions(people say it isn't pay2win but its not aestetic its game affecting, so it is). even if it was actually good it'd still be no. (and 7/10 isn't so bad thats 3/5ths good)
edit- i forgot the upgrade version where you can play in any faction as the locked imperial race with its own bonuses, gives a faster horse and an xp boost so thats a thing too. id have rated it lower just on all that.

Good as a F2P
Bad as an expensive single payment
A waste as a subscription
Worthless as buy + subscription

The game is not that bad, i did try it in beta, but i enjoy the single player(optional multiplayer) more.

Anyway don't really trust pcgamer ratings, that one and ign usually rate with their pockets, the more you pay the higher the score.

never taken into consideration to play this stuff.

all these "MMOs" are the same now, all clones of eachother, quests are "kill 20 of these and come back", finish go back "now kill 20 of those!" boring grindfests to get max levels.

Been worried bout this from the start, the pricing completely turned me off. Not gona touch it till its F2P. Give me a TES game with BL2 style coop any day.