It's correct. But that this graph is not like the ones that most of us are used to.
Total GAs are counted as 100%. 60,6% of GAs were public ones, and when you "move" from top of the graph to the bottom of this "grey area" of public GAs will end on the line which separate "little more gray area of invite only GAs". From top to this point you have 60,6% of GAs. Then there is area of invite only GAs, separated by "green area" of group GAs - moving down from grey to green line will give you 9,8%. And so on. That way it shows nicely if there was change in proportion in public / invite / group / wishlist GAs without lowering readibility.
Comment has been collapsed.
2,066 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by Megamind9
11 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Chris76de
1,340 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by LuckyStrike1305
367 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Vodeni
66 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by doslover
37 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by katukinabarra
113 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Ekaros
30 Comments - Last post 39 seconds ago by quijote3000
72 Comments - Last post 58 seconds ago by ormax3
51 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by UnknownEAK
37 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by OneNonLy
100 Comments - Last post 42 minutes ago by ThePonz
7,953 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by FranckCastle
29 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by marianoag
It seems that the chart showing giveaways per type is incorrect. The text says that 60.6% giveaways in March were public, while the chart displays 100%. There were more group giveaways than invite only ones, however the chart displays the opposite. Numbers also don't match (for both). Whitelist giveaways seem to be displayed correctly.
Comment has been collapsed.