A game series you need to play as a whole

Yeah. I have Liberty City Stories as well. Too bad they aren't on PC. Oh, and London 1961/1969 are great as well. :)

puts argue pants

Welp OP asked for sagas that in our opinion worth to play. I said my opinion...

F3 decisions were meaningless in every way, as far as I remember there are no more than 10-20 decisions that actually matter and make stuff change. And about the bugs there some bug fixing mods. Besides (and I forgot to say this one) for me Fallout 3 was Oblivion with guns, seriously.

And the very only games I played younger were the Mario games from N64 and GTA VC. Most old school games I know and I like I played no more than 2 years ago (and I still do) so nostalgia is out of the question (but for most people, yeah the nostalgia glasses are everything)

You didnt ask why for Skyrim so I didnt bother to mention it, but anyways here we go puts angry argue shirt: lame characters, broken quests (this one is a bit tricky to explain), bad politics, bad lore (note that Im not talking about the TES lore but the part talked in Skyrim, for example how basic is lore explained to the player about the nords), fighters guild (companions my ass), weak magic till high stages of the game, not many things to do (other than farming, questing and exploring, there isnt much to do...), the biggest one: DEM CASUALS! The game's mechanics are purely made for casual players giving them not only inmortal NPCs to kill stuff but also holding the hand of the player all the time (instead of asking questions to where to go and how to do this or that, NO, you follow a marker that is implented on a microchip in Dragonborn's head with a very good GPS feature), and there are other reasons that I am too lazy to name.

But dude if you think different, for me its like "biggest maximum meh" ._.

I only see three statements of yours.

AC2 was better, but I still liked AC1 very much.
Its strongest point was the setting, for me. Just roaming among the crowded streets of ancient cities really felt immersive and amazing. AC2 topped that easily, but without comparing both games, AC1 was great.

But like I said; It seems I'm the only one who thinks that AC1 wasn't that bad at all. :P

Anyone who didn't play AC1 back when it was recent is almost certainly better off watching the videos on Youtube. I thought the story was interesting enough to endure it, but you really were replaying almost the exact same missions 9 times. The Ezio trilogy was terrific, though.

Most of those games are pretty old and you could easily find all the info about them everywhere on the internet.
You could also check reviews to know that, which are also everywhere.
And I'm not against this thread actually but I prefer to always play any series from the beginning whether it was connected by a story or not.

There were really only a few points in it that were important, the rest just seemed to be there to reinforce those points.
Finding out about the lost heir to the toy factory, finding out why he was so obsessed with mammoths (the part in the cave), and when you find him at the end of Syberia 1 are the only super important plot points, the rest are just there to reinforce Hans' character, his obsession, and his genius, the museum bit for an example could have been skipped and the core plot would not have changed, though it was a good way of introducing more of the world, and showing what an impact Hans had had on it
as for Syberia 2, there were even less "important" bits, you made your way across Russia, with most parts being world building, as you got further away from where he had previously been technology became less impressive, and it seemed like it was also trying to make it seem like a race against the clock, as it was unclear how much of this strain Hans could actually take. Oscar's sacrifice feels like it was meant to reinforce it, even though there were also external reasons for things happening the way they did, and then you found the mammoths, with no clear way of getting home again

Syberia was, to me, more the story of Hans than of Kate. And actually, I'm a bit worried how Syberia 3 will change my view of this. People might say that a bad sequel won't take away the memories of earlier games/movies, but for me they very much do impact how I view the earlier parts. If Syberia 3 were to focus on an entirely different story, like for an example what's actually going on at the toy factory, I would not be worried, but I think Kate and Hans' have reached the end of their stories.