Touch your pussy every night

I was saving that one for later. :p

No, but it's the game i get where i adapt my threads on (or find a game with a certain title in mind), since there is no game that has breast in it's title, i choosen this else if there was such a game i would have just formulated it differently.
Like https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/v8btT/how-do-you-excite-a-cock for the male body part.

Been doing that for some months now, in any form (and not just women), i never intent for anyone to get insulted with it, and just bring some lightness to the forum, when sometimes there is already enough drama to go around.

I think your entire argument against me is based on a false premise. Maybe I was not clear enough but you misconstrued my words. I never said that a thread about female masturbation does not deserve its own thread. And I certainly did not say that male masturbation is inherently more deserving of discussion than female masturbation.

As a thought experiment to illustrate, (letting it slide for a moment that this thread isn't actually about masturbation at all, but framed as such for humourous effect, mirroring the video within) let's say there had already been a thread on the forum with the title Ladies, touch yourself tonight., and featured this video. If Lugum had made a thread titled Stroke your cock every night in response to this, in a similar fashion as the one here, and made a giveaway for, say, Crazy Chicken or whatever, I would have reacted in the same way. (I alluded to as much in my previous comment where I expressed my disdain for this, remember?) It's the crude humour itself that I found annoying in that instance, and the fact that a thread was made just for this one throwaway joke. As I said previously, this is the OP's shtick and I usually just ignore it, but for some reason I didn't this one time.

That it just happened to spark a debate thanks to people like yourself who elevated the discussion is a happy accident. It's pretty obvious that the OP didn't really intend for it. But that may be actually moot now, because if the thread provided you with a starting point to elaborate on the issue, then it served beyond its intended purpose and has hopefully netted a positive effect. I understand that this may be one of the points you were making, but in fairness, this was not the case when I made my comment and it was unclear how it would play out. Also, just because something has the potential to bring about positive change by virtue of its mere existence doesn't mean it should be exempt from criticism in regards to its delivery. This thread doesn't get an automatic pass because its sole existence may potentially contribute to normalising a wrongly maligned subject. Not if it the manner and intent with which it was delivered are inane.

For the sake of brevity, I'll address the points you summed up in your TL;DR, as they reflect the body of your text above:

1)No other kind of discussion has to have a "purpose" or deeper meaning to justify its existence. Why should things about masturbation?

As I alluded to above, you're making a false assumption based on flawed inductive reasoning. Just because I criticised this particular thread for lacking in quality or purpose doesn't mean I think it is acceptable for people to go around shitposting about anything else with little purpose or meaning.

2)The obvious implication with these kinds of comments, therefore is that masturbation is an inherently negative/distasteful thing. Talk of it may be accepted if it serves some higher purpose or agenda, but otherwise is ill-advised.

That may seem obvious from the point of view you are approaching this subject from, but that is certainly not what I implied. I said that I usually tend to dislike frat boy jokes, language and toilet humour in general (with the proviso that there is a time and place for it. On another day, when I'm in a different mood, I may find something like that hilarious). The latter category may include, but does not equal or is limited to masturbation. Moreover, in this context, it's less the subject matter of the joke itself I take issue with, but the way in which that subject is broached. It is also logically unsound to draw the conclusion that I would find masturbation inherently negative based on this statement alone (I don't).

3)I do not believe that nor do I see any reason to believe that. Masturbation is a great and amazing thing for men and women alike, and too many young people are tormented by the stigma that surrounds it, especially in religious communities.

No disagreement from me there. But again, I didn't say or imply anything of the sort.

4)The only reason I can see for people to want young people to have a less enjoyable life for the purpose of some "refined society" ideal is conservatism.

That may be true. But again, I don't know what I said earlier should have to do with it. It is not implied in anything I have said here.

5)I naturally blacklist conservatives. Not out of hate, just out of "If some random person is to receive this, I'd rather an oppressed person or someone fighting for said oppressed person".

As is your prerogative. But since you seem to take me for some kind of right wing fanatic or conservative moralist, I'll have you know that you couldn't be further from the truth, that I've never voted for any conservative party in my life nor do I identify as a member of such, and that I frequently critique the sanctimonious proselytising of self-fashioned moral guardians (as often found in conservative circles) who bemoan the supposed moral decay of society but gladly support and believe in disastrous trickle-down public policies and ill-guided tax cuts for the wealthy.

I'll examine the argument you were contending as you summed it up in your final paragraph and address it here, as I think it illustrates the train of thought that led you into making the argument in the way you did:

Someone who thinks talk of masturbation is "distasteful and vacuous"

This is the first implied statement I have an issue with. You see, I never said that talk of masturbation per se is distasteful and vacuous, but rather that the joke/thread, as it was presented here was.

unless it meets some magical meaningfulness criteria that we don't require any other kind of discussion to meet,

This double standard that you are alleging was never explicitly formulated in any of my arguments, nor was it implied. Nowhere did I mention that other subjects should be exempt from scrutiny or criticism if they deserved it.

is obviously coming at this from a conservative background.

As I said earlier, this may be true, but only if the condition you imposed on it beforehand were fulfilled, which I demonstrated was not in my case.

Look, I think we got off on the wrong foot here. Basically what I said was that I want better quality jokes, I want better threads and I want less shitposting around here. This particular shitpost just happened to employ crude language/humour to refer to female masturbation. I chastised the OP for creating it, and invoking evidence that is simply not there, you seemed to have me pigeonholed as a (moral) conservative who clutches their pearls whenever masturbation or (female) sexuality is mentioned and who's out on a crusade to silence any talk or debate about it. It's a disingenuous and unfair characterisation based on a logically flawed conclusion. Notice how I didn't make a single inference about your beliefs or positions in any of this? Because apart from the fact that you care about the issue at hand (and that you aren't fond of conservatives), I don't know anything about you or what kind of person you are. I wish you hadn't jumped to completely inaccurate conclusions about my person either.

Let me put it like this: If you or anyone else wants to talk or make a joke about masturbation, I'm totally fine with it. If you or anyone else wants to make a shitpost with a crude joke in it, I reserve the right to roll my eyes and maybe voice my disapproval.

Edited for clarity.