Deleted

Well, they were both Space Operas with basically no aliens so they do have a few things in common but I just couldn't stand this "We're the crew of the Raza!" and we can topple galaxies - stuff they kept repeating every episode without ever explaining or showing why that's supposed to be soo badass. Let alone the amnesia trope. But due to the lack of good Space Operas recently I still kept watching it occasionally.

I had not heard of Altered Carbon yet. Thanks for bringing it to my attention ;)

Babylon 5, one of the first story arch driven scifi shows.

You mean this?
That's from the end of season 2, when she escaped from the Martian embassy and wandered around on Earth for the first time.

View attached image.

Yes I know where to get things, I did that for the first season of one of the AMC shows after it was dropped. I actually didn't find out AMC was dropped until the season started and I went to watch the first episode of the season and instead of the show it was some kind of sports show. About half of the channel lineup was already sports channels I didn't watch and was pretty pissed when they replaced AMC with yet another sports channel I won't watch.

I don't watch live TV, I record it on my DVR and watch it later. I don't watch that much TV, so I get behind a bit. I'll usually watch an episode several days after it records. Right now there are only three shows being recorded. One of them gets priority and I watch it if it's available, otherwise I alternate between the other two. I'm actually behind 2 weeks on the other two episodes because I either haven't had the time or been in the mood to watch TV.

Unfortunately I don't live in a state that is implementing, or is even likely to implement, it's on net neutrality rules. We don't have big name cable providers like Comcast here. I live in a small town just outside of a large city. Comcast serves the city, but they wouldn't push out to the smaller towns. The local cable co. eventually got around to setting up broadband around 2002-2003ish. Though the name is the same, they were bought out a long time ago by some larger corp. that bought up a lot of small local cable cos. I don't know their position on net neutrality, but I like to think with them being a small time player in the game, they would be for it since it seems like it would be beneficial to them to keep the big boys in line.

I had hoped that one of the other states would put a clause in their net neutrality laws that they wouldn't do business with a company that violates their net neutrality standards anywhere. As far as I know, no net neutrality laws, passed or proposed, have such a clause.

AT&T moved in a few years ago and began offering their u-verse junk. At first it only covered a small part of the town, and the higher speeds were even farther limited. Now I think they cover the whole town. It did force the cable co. to up their game and luckily they didn't get squeezed out because I hate AT&T. When AT&T started to advertise their arrival, our standard speed was 1Mbit. Within days of an AT&T u-verse flier showing up on my door, the cable co. upgraded the standard speed to 10Mbit. A year later it went up to 20Mbit, then 30Mbit where it still is now. AT&T offers the same exact speeds for the same exact price, and it's been pretty stagnant since that first little race.

The problem with a lot of ISPs is that they don't want to expand or compete, that costs money. They want to hold what they have and rake in profits. Although we had a bit of competition here that drove speeds up while prices stayed the same, AT&T offers faster u-verse speeds in other state, and it's not like my cable co. is a using type of copper cable than Comcast, who can offer 300Mbit. I think after their brief little race, AT&T and my cable co. agreed to call a truce and stop one-upping the other, so they didn't have to expand or upgrade.