Well apparently one of the people working in Obsidian is part of the advisory board for Fig, so makes sense they went with that.
Edit: In the about page of fig one of the CEO of Obsidian is in the board.
Comment has been collapsed.
tbh I'd personally have doubts fu nding something on platform belonging to company doing crowdfunding. I get that crowdfunding is always a risk, but crowdfunding project on platform belonging to developer of said project is double risk. If you crowdfund on outside platform, first thing your project must fit criteria of said platform, it must be in some way secutre etc, on your own platform there would be no such o0bligation. If project turns out to be a scam you get refund, on such platfor you would not. Etc. I'm not sayig it's the case here, I don't think Obsidian guys to be scammers or anything, just saying it's kinda morally wrong in general to do things this way, no matter of it's done by studio I trust or not.
Comment has been collapsed.
As far as I'm aware, it's a 'by game developers, for game developers' platform, so an advisory board including invested game developers is necessary to the site's functioning. Being on an advisory board- that is, in a role to advise- doesn't necessarily mean influence over the direct control of the company.
Rather, it'd likely make the platform seem more legitimate, to other developers interested in using it.
Given the reputation of those currently involved in the company, it's similarly more trustworthy in reliability of releasing games than Kickstarters usually are. As such, so far there's really not any reason for backers to be concerned over the site, either.
Comment has been collapsed.
Fig is not name anyone know,
I know it. :P
From a SG user perspective, I actually think it's more surprising that you don't, given what it's already been used for; Consortium: The Tower, Wasteland 3, and Psychonauts 2 all got good exposure on SG when they hit Fig, as I recall. Consortium certainly did, given the free copies of Consortium that were being given away as part of that promotion.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's Obsidian. :P
Obsidian (AKA Black Isle/Troika) has such a long history of making exceptional albeit also exceptionally buggy :P games that they could stand on a street corner, and so long as they publicized it, people'd travel over to give them money. :P
There's a lot of costs related to gathering funds, and a streamlined site designed to manage such details cuts a lot of those costs down. Given the good reputation Fig has so far (while KS's has always been a bit sketchy), and the likelihood that Fig takes only a very small cut, it's no doubt a very good option for them.
Comment has been collapsed.
quite a jump there from 5 to 35 bucks you dont even get the first game xd, oh well, glad they did it, im still to play the first one.
Comment has been collapsed.
8 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by radagast82
550 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Dayannah
1,291 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Formidolosus
411 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Ratz0
6 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by Stakaniy
15 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by deadmarsh
19 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by Lironezzz
236 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Tomoel69
114 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by Cassol
29 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by adam1224
729 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by mourinhos86
2 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by simrafael
2,978 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Fluffster
16,407 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by YeOldeLancer
https://www.fig.co/campaigns/deadfire
Kinda strange they put it on some niche crowdfunding platform, but maybe the case they take less % than KS and Pillars gonna get funded anyway wherever they put it after success of first installment.
Comment has been collapsed.