Men of war are not like company of heroes. Men of war are more realistic; an heavy machinegun or a tank can take out infantry with very few hits, the tanks are also really fragile. It's not like company of heroes in which a group of men can take a few dozens of hits then hide.
That said men of war (the original) and men of war red tide have very good campaign for singleplayer.
Men of war assault squad 1/2 is the best to play co-op or multiplayer in my opinion.
Those are the men of war that i played.
Comment has been collapsed.
25 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by entitygeorge
51 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by popp9305
181 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Fluffster
105 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by LosingMyEdge
39 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
760 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by m0r1arty
21 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
18 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by NightWishx
496 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by tamisrah
44 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by egg0
5 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Lugum
513 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by DrTenma
0 Comments - Created 16 minutes ago by FlameB1
19 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by wigglenose
I'm going to give Sega the middle finger because of the dick move with Ardennes pricing. I'll buy some Men of War instead.
How does it compare, gameplay wise, with Company of Heroes (the first one, didn't played CoH2 yet). Which, of the MoW saga, are the best for single player? Which can I pass if I'm not into multiplayer?
Thanks a lot.
Edit: stupid editor... :p
Comment has been collapsed.