I wanted to make a poll but accidentally submitted it before I was finished :(
Comment has been collapsed.
Probably nothingness. But that's really, really boring and I'd rather not live my life believing in that. I'm a more interesting person than that (or so I like to believe). I like the idea of rounding about as a spirit, or go to heaven or hell. I like the idea of being more than just this body - the concept of "soul" is very appealing to me. If your spirit stays too long here on earth, you'll become a vengeful spirit. So yeah, I don't really believe in this sort of stuff (rationally), but I choose to have a more interesting belief wheel. Makes life (and death) more interesting.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nothingness. Our bodies, those who aren't cremated, will slowly disintegrate and become part of the soil, eventually, after some generations, that soil will be used to cultivate some lettuce. Then, a futuristic vegan will acquire said lettuce and make a soy taco out of it, using the lettuce as a tortilla. And he/she will say, what a tasty vegan taco! totally unaware that my remains now form part of the lettuce, in a molecular scale.
But I secretly wish that when we die we become part of some "universal conscience" and we observe everything as a whole.
Or if we live in a simulation, maybe the overlords controlling it just send us to the Recycle Bin and that is when we die. Then they press "Empty the recycle bin" and we are tagged as "free space" in some sector of their hard drives. Eventually we will become overwrited and the bytes of information that conformed our conscience will be changed forever.
Comment has been collapsed.
I've always been terrified of it. Not the nothingness so much as never being with the ones I love ever again. I'm a twin so I was never alone, even before I was born so the idea of losing that connection to the humans I have met and love in my life is something that scares me.
I don't know what I believe because well, we won't know until we're there, right? But I like the idea of reincarnation more than most. Especially if we get to meet the ones we love in other places and other times.
And yes I know, technically we wouldn't know them, but you know sometimes you meet someone and you feel like you've known them all your life? Maybe you have.
I sure don't like the idea of Heaven. Sounds boring. And I don't like exclusive clubs with bouncers that tell people who's welcome and who's not depending on how cool they are. Also, since most of my people are non believers, I wouldn't want to hang out where they are not welcome, even if I was allowed in.
So maybe we can make our own hangout for non-believers? I'm sure it would be way cooler anyway.
Comment has been collapsed.
The Egg
By: Andy Weir
You were on your way home when you died.
It was a car accident. Nothing particularly remarkable, but fatal nonetheless. You left behind a wife and two children. It was a painless death. The EMTs tried their best to save you, but to no avail. Your body was so utterly shattered you were better off, trust me.
And that’s when you met me.
“What… what happened?” You asked. “Where am I?”
“You died,” I said, matter-of-factly. No point in mincing words.
“There was a… a truck and it was skidding…”
“Yup,” I said.
“I… I died?”
“Yup. But don’t feel bad about it. Everyone dies,” I said.
You looked around. There was nothingness. Just you and me. “What is this place?” You asked. “Is this the afterlife?”
“More or less,” I said.
“Are you god?” You asked.
“Yup,” I replied. “I’m God.”
“My kids… my wife,” you said.
“What about them?”
“Will they be all right?”
“That’s what I like to see,” I said. “You just died and your main concern is for your family. That’s good stuff right there.”
You looked at me with fascination. To you, I didn’t look like God. I just looked like some man. Or possibly a woman. Some vague authority figure, maybe. More of a grammar school teacher than the almighty.
“Don’t worry,” I said. “They’ll be fine. Your kids will remember you as perfect in every way. They didn’t have time to grow contempt for you. Your wife will cry on the outside, but will be secretly relieved. To be fair, your marriage was falling apart. If it’s any consolation, she’ll feel very guilty for feeling relieved.”
“Oh,” you said. “So what happens now? Do I go to heaven or hell or something?”
“Neither,” I said. “You’ll be reincarnated.”
“Ah,” you said. “So the Hindus were right,”
“All religions are right in their own way,” I said. “Walk with me.”
You followed along as we strode through the void. “Where are we going?”
“Nowhere in particular,” I said. “It’s just nice to walk while we talk.”
“So what’s the point, then?” You asked. “When I get reborn, I’ll just be a blank slate, right? A baby. So all my experiences and everything I did in this life won’t matter.”
“Not so!” I said. “You have within you all the knowledge and experiences of all your past lives. You just don’t remember them right now.”
I stopped walking and took you by the shoulders. “Your soul is more magnificent, beautiful, and gigantic than you can possibly imagine. A human mind can only contain a tiny fraction of what you are. It’s like sticking your finger in a glass of water to see if it’s hot or cold. You put a tiny part of yourself into the vessel, and when you bring it back out, you’ve gained all the experiences it had.
“You’ve been in a human for the last 48 years, so you haven’t stretched out yet and felt the rest of your immense consciousness. If we hung out here for long enough, you’d start remembering everything. But there’s no point to doing that between each life.”
“How many times have I been reincarnated, then?”
“Oh lots. Lots and lots. An in to lots of different lives.” I said. “This time around, you’ll be a Chinese peasant girl in 540 AD.”
“Wait, what?” You stammered. “You’re sending me back in time?”
“Well, I guess technically. Time, as you know it, only exists in your universe. Things are different where I come from.”
“Where you come from?” You said.
“Oh sure,” I explained “I come from somewhere. Somewhere else. And there are others like me. I know you’ll want to know what it’s like there, but honestly you wouldn’t understand.”
“Oh,” you said, a little let down. “But wait. If I get reincarnated to other places in time, I could have interacted with myself at some point.”
“Sure. Happens all the time. And with both lives only aware of their own lifespan you don’t even know it’s happening.”
“So what’s the point of it all?”
“Seriously?” I asked. “Seriously? You’re asking me for the meaning of life? Isn’t that a little stereotypical?”
“Well it’s a reasonable question,” you persisted.
I looked you in the eye. “The meaning of life, the reason I made this whole universe, is for you to mature.”
“You mean mankind? You want us to mature?”
“No, just you. I made this whole universe for you. With each new life you grow and mature and become a larger and greater intellect.”
“Just me? What about everyone else?”
“There is no one else,” I said. “In this universe, there’s just you and me.”
You stared blankly at me. “But all the people on earth…”
“All you. Different incarnations of you.”
“Wait. I’m everyone!?”
“Now you’re getting it,” I said, with a congratulatory slap on the back.
“I’m every human being who ever lived?”
“Or who will ever live, yes.”
“I’m Abraham Lincoln?”
“And you’re John Wilkes Booth, too,” I added.
“I’m Hitler?” You said, appalled.
“And you’re the millions he killed.”
“I’m Jesus?”
“And you’re everyone who followed him.”
You fell silent.
“Every time you victimized someone,” I said, “you were victimizing yourself. Every act of kindness you’ve done, you’ve done to yourself. Every happy and sad moment ever experienced by any human was, or will be, experienced by you.”
You thought for a long time.
“Why?” You asked me. “Why do all this?”
“Because someday, you will become like me. Because that’s what you are. You’re one of my kind. You’re my child.”
“Whoa,” you said, incredulous. “You mean I’m a god?”
“No. Not yet. You’re a fetus. You’re still growing. Once you’ve lived every human life throughout all time, you will have grown enough to be born.”
“So the whole universe,” you said, “it’s just…”
“An egg.” I answered. “Now it’s time for you to move on to your next life.”
And I sent you on your way.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't read much. I had no idea who he was until today, but I have had this short story saved for a while.
I have had this idea for a long time that we may have a soul and the human body is just a temporary vessel that we use to experience life. I have wondered if when we die, it is just our current body that dies and our soul is reborn in a new baby with no memory of any previous lives.
I never really thought about it further because there is no way to know the truth and it is all just speculation, but I was interested to see if other people talked about the same thing, so I looked it up one day and found this short story. I was thinking that every human has there own soul and is being reborn when they die, so there would be billions of souls experiencing life at the same time. This story was the first time I saw it put as if there was only one soul experiencing all the different lives.
I also wonder if humans and our universe as we know it is some kind of simulation. We could just be an experiment that some higher being is running. The earth and our universe could be the size of a petri dish to a larger being. Or it could be like a computer simulation and we could be living this life in this artificial reality for a multitude of different reasons. Maybe we did something wrong and living a life or a certain number of lives in this simulation is like a prison sentence. Maybe when our sentence is up or we have learned what we need to learn, we die here and are woken up in the real world.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, I'm a Christian. So after death I will be with my Lord and Savior - and with plenty of people of all types and from all parts of the world throughout history. I won't really consider that as boring.
With some previous commentators I agree that some of the children's stories do now sound quite dull or lacking imagination. But that's how it always is with children. As children you are given some basic images of everything, and later when you grow up you'll find them dull. Works with what you learn about heaven, works with what you learn about math. Images of heaven are attempts to describe indescribable. So in different times very different kinds of stories have worked. I won't cherish the idea of singing in a choir in white robes through eternity. But I won't have to. Some do, and if it works for them, fine. Same goes with that red guy jumping around in a hot place with a trireme. Maybe the image worked at some point, and that's fine. For me it looks more like a bad satire.
As a Christian I try to understand something about heaven and hell from what's revealed in the Bible. There's not much we can understand of something where we haven't been and which is quite literally "otherworldly". Whether a Christian or not won't make much difference in that. But what I hold quite certain is that my feeling's will change that as much as they will change the overall reality in this world - and that is nothing. So my purpose is not so much to feel but to attempt to understand something, to attempt to imagine according to the hints given. And when one actually reads the Bible beyond the stories told in childhood or later stories by some animal hating preachers, they are very different. There are plenty of images given about afterlife, and the variation of the ways the heaven and hell are depicted is huge. So there is lots of room for imagination different from the traditional stories.
To give one example of a different Christian way to see heaven and hell I would highly recommend reading C.S.Lewis: The Great Divorce. It will definitely give some food for thought.
Comment has been collapsed.
At the end up the day, anything aside from the basic naturalistic ideas remains a baseless (generally unprovable) hypothesis...
There is really no reason to suspect that there is something "after" as nothing seems to indicate it, and every claim of your personality or experience outliving your body is disproved through neurology, biology and/or simple experimentation depending on the particular claim.
So far there has been nothing where the answer was some "super nature", so there is really no real (non-pragmatic) reason to believe that there is such a thing.
Aside from the psychological benefits these beliefs may at times have, I see no reason for anyone to conclude that such a thing is real, or even possible. But to each their own...
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't know how the hell I'm supposed to follow something like "The Egg"; anything I say will seem insignificant, because that really says it all. But here goes, anyway: my beliefs are a mix of many different Eastern philosophies, mostly Hindu and Buddhist. I've also struggled with Christianity - both spiritually with myself; and physically with those who mocked, beat, and spat on me, because I was born a heretic - but I'm long past the point of harboring any ill will against it; I am not quite so young, anymore. I believe in Samsara, which is not only the wheel of birth and death, but also that we will someday grow spiritually to that point that we leave it. I believe in the concept of Atman and Brahman. Atman is a Hindu concept equivalent to the soul, and Brahman is the Cosmic Body, from which all Atman comes and to which it will return. All of our lives, our experiences, and everything we are and have seen come together in - pardon the inelegance of the following analogy, but - a sort of cosmic YouTube, where all of existence is recorded.
Though I strongly hold the belief of reincarnation - largely due to my experiences in this life, as well as memories that I cannot otherwise explain - the rest of it is, as you've said, more of a hope than a belief; it gives me comfort to know that all of the beauty we've seen in our time will not be lost; that it will wind up SOMEWHERE.
Another part of the equation is the mind. What is it? Is it just the brain? Is it just our thoughts? What are they? Chemical reactions or something more? Is there a spiritual body, or is the concept of the mind just a fluke set of amino acids and electrical impulses? The question, should you choose to work toward an answer, brings more questions that are equally difficult to answer, but no less important..
But we don't really know. I mean, some "know" just the same some people even in this day and age "know" that the world is flat, but what we know isn't always true, so much as knowledge in which we have the utmost confidence. I've studied most major religions, and while they all have their own beliefs as to what lies beyond, I feel like most of it is what their culture finds comforting to them. Some use it to scare others into being good; some use it to soothe the minds of those near death. But what do I know? I'm agnostic; present your case well enough, and I'll approach it with an open mind.
Comment has been collapsed.
I have been Christian, so as a child I believed somewhat in that heaven or hell thing, too. Evangelic though, so way less strict rules than Catholocism teaches. After getting more information about other religions in my youth I detached myself from the Evangelic beliefs and decided to go on with an own, way more simple "religion": there are things between heaven and earth, which can't be explained by physics or other science (at least yet) and there's somewhat like fate with all its consequences (e.g. doing good things to others surely don't harm your fate, so at least try it as good as you can).
Regarding the aspect of the afterlife: reincarnation would be nice if we could at least unconciously remember it and therefore treat other beings better. But I doubt it.. most probably it will be nothingness.
And at this point I have to agree with most Avantyr wrote: there is nothing indicating an afterlife. If there is anything, you can't control it. There are enough other reasons to behave altruistic, so the fear of a final judgement isn't needed.
It's okay to create some mind games about it in a philosophical manner, but getting to deep into it or even setting high hopes in it leads to escapism. Life offers you chances, whereas noone knows if afterlife does. So use them while you're alive.
Comment has been collapsed.
are far as proof of anything beyond death is concerned the only person i feel i trust to not be full of crap is Edgar Cayce. he used to do these readings where he would go into a trance as his wife would read letters from people with health issues then he would give them advice on how to cure the different ailments. since these and what he told them to do is recorded and what he told them did help in most cases (at lest the cases that followed up with him) it gives him some credibility. one of the cases was a blind man asking if it could be cured and edger told them that he could not help them because the blindness was punishment for a past life where he would blind people before they threw them to the animals though it wasn't punishment for blinding them but for enjoying it.
you should look him up he does talk about a lot of subjects. there is a clinic with records of all his cases where they try to use the information to try and help people with his cures.
Comment has been collapsed.
This could sound stupid for some people, but I think we are going to the astral world (or whatever you want to call it) after death.
I experienced it myself (no drugs or anything involved), for me, it's real. Some cientific studies have said that it's just a brain hallucination but they can't really prove if something else is going on.
Comment has been collapsed.
Logically speaking when you die you seize to exist. You won't have thoughts, you won't exist.
I think its good for people to accept this truth sooner than later. It will make you cherish each day and avoid making decisions that may impact the well being of your happiness or decisions that may shorten your lifespan. (Causing violence, going to war, committing crimes, etc.)
Going a bit deeper, most people seem to think that living longer or forever is a bad thing. Personally I'd love to lengthen my lifespan as I feel like life is far too short to experience everything. (Especially to play all my games >.< haha)
On the flip side I'm glad that everyone dies within their ~80 year lifespan. Might be a bit wrong, but sometimes I'll look at someone who is very outgoing or very rich and get a bit jealous, but then I'll comfort myself by thinking that they are going to die and no amount of money will save them. I also feel like people who work 50+ hours a week are wasting their lives away. Some people think you need to work until you retire at 65-70. For what? Might as well enjoy life while you are young.
Comment has been collapsed.
When you die that's it. The end.
There's lots of fun theories though. I'd like to think that reincarnation is a thing because there are many interesting mechanics with how that could work.
Comment has been collapsed.
One theory I've heard that's quite different is that because everything is energy (science!) when you die the majority of that energy is left in the form of your decaying body, but some of it likely escapes (neural energy). However the longer its outside the body the more it decays. As a result people that remember past life experiences normally only remember a very tiny part of them since most of the energy that those memories were a part of has already been lost.
So, if you find your 'spirit' floating over your dead body, hopefully you can find a way to move to a new one (fetus) before too much of you is lost.
Comment has been collapsed.
Once we're dead, there's nothing. No heaven or hell, no reincarnation. Period.
We are given this one live and each of us should try to make the best out of it, and don't worry too much of what happens afterwards.
Comment has been collapsed.
Period.
You seem to have a strong belief. Good on you. I'd like to remind you though that it is just that: Something you believe. Others may choose to believe something else, and they are no less right in their belief as you are just because it's different from yours. Just sayin.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, actually people can be less right in their beliefs than others. If I tell you I believe there is a giant lion god roaming the top of a big mountain, and then you search that mountain and find no giant lion - I am clearly wrong in my belief, no matter how hard I believe it. A belief should not be respected merely because it is a belief. And it should always be subject to criticism and discussion, as everything else is. Just saying. ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
Sorry to say, but your reply doesn't make a lot of sense. The subject matter we are talking about here cannot be proven wrong by facts. There are no facts about the afterlife (or whatever it is you choose to believe in). Unless there are people coming back from the dead to let us know what they experienced, we don't know anything. Please correct me if you have more information.
Comment has been collapsed.
My example was meant to show that not every belief is necessarily equally right. It was not targeted at a specific belief.
The subject matter we are talking about here cannot be proven wrong by facts.
Well, that is of course true. But we can at least de-mystify certain things, and with every natural explanation for how the world works we take away some space for supernatural explanations. if the assumption is that consiousness is seperate from the body and that it lives on after the body dies, then all we need to do is prove that consciousness is a purely biological, physical thing. Emerging from how the neurons in your brain are placed and how they interact. That still wouldn't completely disprove every possible way of getting to an afterlife. Supernatural claims can't really be disproven with mere natural evidence. I am aware of that. But it would be one more step to fully explaining the world without any need for supernatural phenomena. It would make the room for supernatural explanations a little bit smaller, like so many discoveries before. That may not count as hard evidence, but it would be evidence against the idea of an eternal soul, as some people see conciousness and soul as equivalent.
I see it that way: without the slightest shred of evidence for something supernatural - like the afterlife - there is absolutely no reason to believe in it. There is simply no basis for such a belief, if we haven't even found any hints that point in that direction. I have as much evidence for unicorns as I have for the afterlife. And I don't believe in unicorns. ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
I started to study psychology about a year ago. There is an annual event our Fachschaft holds, "Psychotage", where we invite all kinds of people to perform workshops and give interesting insights into their professional discipline.
Last year I had the pleasure of following a lecture from Dr. Walter von Lucano, who is responsible for Germany's first and only paranormal counselling center. While I don't claim to have been able to follow him on everything he said (quantum physics really are too high for my current understanding), I was deeply impressed by what he explained about his daily routine throughout his life. Maybe you want to do some research on the guy and watch an interview or two to form yourself an opinion.
EDIT: For example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhCpylgZ2Mo (in German)
What I want to say is: maybe your strong will of wanting to believe in a physical world only makes you blind for all the evidence there is that there is clearly more to our world than meets the eye.
However. I am not going to mess with your belief, you are free to believe whatever you want, as long as you don't claim to know the one and only truth and thereby limiting other poeple's beliefs. ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
(quantum physics really are too high for my current understanding)
Yeah, it's a pure mind fuck. ^^ I like to think I have a basic understanding of how quantum mechanics work, but of course it's extremely basic and I can't say I fully understand everything I read and watched about it. But it's certainly a very interesting topic.
Dr. Walter von Lucano
Thanks, I will see what I can find about him. But I will tell you in advance that I expect to see little more than anecdotal evidence (which isn't worth much). If he has actual evidence and other scientists can confirm it, then that would be very interesting, though.
What I want to say is: maybe your strong will of wanting to believe in a physical world only makes you blind for all the evidence there is that there is clearly more to our world than meets the eye.
I will admit that I usually tend to expect nothing from stories about the supernatural. But I wouldn't say that makes me blind. I am open to evidence. And so far all I saw was stories of individual experiences (which are extremely weak evidence from a scientific standpoint) and disproven claims. So if I seem extremely sceptical - that's just because I think that's the correct way to approach these things. You shouldn't just believe anything. You shouldn't take the word of a single individuum over scientific results. You should always be sceptical and rely on evidence.
However. I am not going to mess with your belief, you are free to believe whatever you want, as long as you don't claim to know the one and only truth and thereby limiting other poeple's beliefs. ;)
Well, I think the only reasonable way to decide whether something is true or not is to go by the available evidence. So I don't claim to know the one and only truth, I go by what we know and what we don't know. And I think it's unreasonable to believe in something without proper evidence. Sorry if you understand that as limiting other people's beliefs. I think every belief should be subject to analysis, criticism and discussion. And if someone believes in something without any proof, then I feel it should absolutely be ok to point that out. That's no disrespect against the person, just against the belief. A belief hasn't earned respect by simply being a belief. I am sure you wouldn't have much respect for my belief if I told you it was the flying spaghetti monster. And that would be ok. It wouldn't deserve any respect. To me the flying spaghetti monster is no different from any religion or any other supernatural belief. The state of evidence is the same. Again, please don't misunderstand. I would never attack a person, but I think it's always ok to doubt and to discuss beliefs, and even attack them if they are harmful (like fortune tellers ripping off people).
If you believe in something supernatural, that's absolutely fine. It doesn't make you any less sympathetic in my opinion, or less entitled to respect or anything like that. But I want to be able to question your belief in a discussion, like we are having here. I don't think (and don't hope) that limits your belief. Unless you change your mind about your belief based on our discussion, of course, but in that case that's probably not a bad thing (if you came to that conclusion with logic and reason). :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Just for the sake of discussion, what if the giant lion had left after you had seen it so the other person didn't see anything when they went out looking, wouldn't you then be both right. I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just saying that perception has a lot to do with it.
Comment has been collapsed.
You found the one mistake in my reasoning. Damn you! ;)
It was just an example. Not a good one, obviously. Better one (I wanted to avoid bringing Christianity in this, but I can't think of a better example): Some Christians believe in the story of Noah. Science disproves the story (there was no no global flood at that time). Whoever still believes in the story after that is definitely wrong. It's a wrong belief. It's not equal to any belief that wasn't disproven yet. Same goes for the 6000 years old earth. The evidence is there, the earth is much, much older. If someone still believes it is 6000 years old, his belief is not equally right to all other beliefs. He is simply wrong, without a doubt. That's what I was trying to say.
Comment has been collapsed.
While you are right, a lot of thing are right till they are discovered to be wrong. You can only go with the evidence you have so far, while we believe some things today and we are right who's to say that one day we won't uncover evidences that will prove it's wrong and then adjust our beliefs accordingly. Hence perception is important when it come to belief and even though I know some beliefs are wrong I can also see how someone could believe that if they had a different perspective than I me.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, but isn't that a big flaw then? If something seems to be true from one perspective, but wrong from another - that is exactly the reason why personal perception is not the way to go in determining whether something is actually true or not. That is why anecdotal evidence is the weakest form of evidence and almost useless (other than giving a reason to further investigate and look for actual evidence).
I can't help thinking about a documentary in which dowsers were scientifically tested. Some of them believed they found water with a stick for 30+ years. They believed they were successful in what they were doing. And they were baffled by the fact that they weren't able to actually find the barrels of water in the test. Some automatically went to denial, claimed there must be something wrong with the test. After being very confident before, they then thought it must only work in very specific conditions that the test didn't reflect. Their powers were disproven by a simple experiment, yet they didn't stop believing in them. Because it would mean they were wrong their whole life (or a big portion of it). I can somehow understand the reaction, sure. But if we want to know about the truth, we have to stick to the scientific method and trust that scientific experiments are more reliable than anecdotes and personal experience.
That's just one example of disproven belief in the supernatural. There were others, of course. From what I've read, whenever personal experiences and supernatural claims are tested, they turn out to be wrong. Dowsers cannot find water any more reliant than any other person, fortune tellers cannot tell the future and supernatural healers cannot really heal anything and have any effect that goes beyond a placebo.
Comment has been collapsed.
Right, that was it. The one with Dawkins. The Enemies of Reason or something provokative like that.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, no doubt about that. Thinking positive can definitely have a positive effect. But it's limited to the physical world. So positive thinking might get you a job, because you made a great impression on a job interview. Or it helps running the 100m faster than you ever did before. But it won't let you fly over the city like superman, no matter how hard you try to think positively about it. ;)
Comment has been collapsed.
I would like to recommend a book to you. It's called "The Red Lion" and was written by Mária Szepes. When I was in a situation where I was spiritually kind of lost as Christianity and its lore and symbolism did not meet what I felt was right inside, this book gave me an understanding of how our souls could evolve over the span of several incarnations, and in the end helped me strive towards being a better person. May it bring some relief to you as well.
Here's a short summary of its content from Wikipedia
Szepes tells the story of the unhappy Hans Burgner, a miller's son born in the 16th century. After the death of his weak father and of a likewise miserable but beloved teacher, he becomes afraid of the unavoidable death of all living things. Driven by a monomania fed by persistent rumors of an Elixir of Immortality, he becomes an apprentice of a mysterious physician and alchemist. However, instead of listening to the Alchemist's compassionate counsel and warnings, Burgner is driven by feverish greed to murder him; in this way, he acquires the Elixir while he is still spiritually unprepared, and is cursed thereby. This is the starting-point of a journey through the centuries: while Burgner can physically die, the Elixir enables him to retain the full memory of his previous lives as he repeatedly reincarnates into a variety of different circumstances. It also bestows upon him a profound spiritual sensitivity. Several times he attempts the Great Transmutation in order to deliver himself from his self-imposed curse. Hans Burgner is refined through his various incarnations. Against the backdrop of the last five centuries of European history, he undergoes dramatic personal development: beginning as a spiritually unawakened (and even infamous) character, he matures spiritually through the various challenges he is led to confront. He is first an initiate and Aspirant, eventually attaining the perfection of human personality which characterizes the Magus, or spiritual Adept.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hey eeev! I had got the book as Christmas gift, but had to continue another book first. A few days ago I finished reading it and enjoyed it, though I'm not that interested in esoterism or alchemy. Some process descriptions of these things could have been shortened from my point of view, but overall it was interesting and gripping. Szepes wrote very illustrative and Hans received the ending he deserved. Thanks again for the recommendation!
Comment has been collapsed.
The only one who really can tell us what happens after, is the one who came back from the dead
Comment has been collapsed.
I´ve always had this theory. They say that when a baby is born the first thing they see is a bright light. Most people who have near death experiences claim to see a bright light. So when you die somewhere you are born somewhere else, and when someone has a near death experience a baby is born dead.
Comment has been collapsed.
I´ve never considered it reincarnation, more like recycling. When the person dies it ceases to exist, only the life force remains and it enters another body being born, the slate is wiped clean, there is absolutely nothing left of the person that lived before. About the changes in population I never took them into account, maybe there is like a "reserve" or "buffer" where life forces are stored.
Comment has been collapsed.
That would only work if life would first exits when a baby leaves the womb
But babys in the womb are already living beings with own personalities
Comment has been collapsed.
9 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Masafor
49 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by Chris76de
76 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by sensualshakti
34 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by JMM72
4 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by despiesi96
1,962 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by MeguminShiro
15 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by dingbat
261 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by HustlaOG
799 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by canis39
66 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Deyalleft
176 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Gberry
2,576 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by provi
94 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by axolotlprime
463 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by Carenard
So I was reading some scps recently and was reminded of scp-2718. It's probably in my top 5 favorite scp articles, but it paints a horrifying picture of the afterlife, the same reality as ours, still trapped in our mortal body, feeling every decomposition and degradation of your body, your particles, a seemingly exponentially painful and uncomfortable eternity.
I'm not one who's afraid of death, actually the opposite, but stories like this put a little bit of fear and doubt in me. Only ones like it, this one in particular I love, but have no belief in. But that is a story, not a actual theory, so it's not unexpected. The similar theory that actually has made me scared of death is that when our bodies go our consciousness continues. We become trapped in a void of nothingness with only our thoughts. I spend all day blaring music or podcasts or writings trying to avoid my thoughts, an eternity with them is worse than any hell that I could imagine.
That thought is behind my dislike and fear of many theories. I used to be Christian. as a tiny child I believed when I died I would go to an awesome happy place called heaven.I loved the idea of an afterlife and wanted to go so badly. As I grew older they started to actually explain what heaven was. A place where your pets couldn't go, nor the nonbelievers. I hated that, but if I could not feel what I did on mortal Earth then it's fine. But then I started thinkng I wouldn't. Depression is part of the brain, so I'd keep that when I went to heaven. An eternity of feeling the way I did and being a guy seemed no different than hell. Later I learned in heaven we will be given new bodies, Maybe I could be a girl? However, with these new bodies our minds are also kinda changed and we become eternal worshipers, and that is not an eternal existence I want.
As you can tell, I struggled a lot with Christianity, and I eventually lost my belief. I dabbled with the belief of reincarnation, the idea I could be someone else seemed very apealing, but more like a hope than a belif. Now I just think that we cease to exist when we die. I don't really put much thought into it ir other beliefs because I hope that what I believe is true and want to keep believing it is.
But I kinda am interested in other ideas of after death and thoughts on those ideas so if you have any please comment. I'm on mobile and lazy, but I might add a ga tomorrow.
And Suddenly a ga!
Comment has been collapsed.