So I'm thinking in upgrading my old nVidia 9500GT with an nVidia GeForce GTX650.

Specs:
Name: Gigabyte nVidia GeForce GTX650, 2GB, GDDR5, DVI, PCI-E
Max Resolution: 2560 x 1600
CPU Frecuency: 1058 MHz, 28 nanometer
RAM Frecuency: 5000 MHz
RAM: 2048 MB
Bit: 128bit
Tehnologies: NVIDIA PhysX, nVIDIA CUDA, nVIDIA 3D Vision
OpenGL: 4.2 version

What do you say? Also I saw a nVidia GTX560, 1GB, GDDR5 with 256bit, what do you say?

Also don't recommend me other video cards, I want only Gigabyte nVidia.

1 decade ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Good card you chose, I'm upgrading the same card soon.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Don't know if I should go for 128bit GTX650 or 256bit GTX560 :-?

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

256 may be better

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Looks like the 560Ti might be a good bit more expensive than the 650

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not the Ti version?

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well TI is expensive and don't really want to pay that much for a video card. Also can you explain with what TI is better? I didn't read any info so don't really know.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

650 Ti comes with Assassin's Creed 3 for free. You could sell that for $40 probably to offset the difference in cost between that card and the non-Ti version you are considering.

$120 for 650 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125445

$160 for 650Ti http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125447

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

See for yourself. I could list out why it's better, but you can see for yourself in these benchmarks here. The difference is quite noticeable.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ti is for people who want performance in their games for the extra price. Going from 560 to 660 is enough for Metro 2033 and SS3 on 1920 X 1200 at high fps. Extra CPU will not matter at this point and the graphics card is always bottlenecking the computer these days.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Both cards are really good but I would go for the 2GB card if I were to choose.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah I would go too, but many people say that 256bit is more essential than video RAM. Don't know :(

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think if you don't go 660 you might as well just get a 560. The 650 is way weaker then 560

Some tech specs

and more

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why would you say that?

EDIT: Thanks for the link

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd say go for a 660 ti, I mean for a bit more you get a card that will last you over 3 years.

Here's one on sale, but with X-mas around the corner you'll find cheaper. . . The Msi 2 gig Pe is the beast on the market. . . but they all use the same core up to the 690, just the shaders are halved (or something)

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Good point. I forgot about the 650's weaknesses. :p

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

560 is a good bit more expensive than the 650

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

yes, but you get what you pay for.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, except he specifically said "Also don't recommend me other video cards" so suggesting a card 50% more expensive than the one he is asking about seems to be missing what he is asking about.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Save up and at least get the TI, or the AMD equivalent.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

same stats, your point?

Oh and it's ( word ) [ link ]

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

and that site is useless. it says a 560 ti is .3X more powerful then a 660 ti look. yet a 550 is less powerful then a 660 here

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In the first link you've accidentally chosen 560Ti vs 650Ti while I think you meant 560Ti vs 660Ti since you wrote that in your comment.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ya, he's confused.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

yeah I didn't see that. It didn't refresh, so it was still on 650.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

shit happens

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not the same stats. HWcompare uses theoretical stats calculated based on hardware specs alone. Anandtech compares actual performance in a wide range of games at different resolutions.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you are right. I'm tired. HWcomapre is waaay better.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It would still be worse even if all GPU's used exactly the same architecture, all games used exactly the same coding and all graphics cards somehow were able to run without drivers. Even then it wouldn't take the variable resolutions into consideration. Then again I don't really care what you think. It's obvious I won't learn anything from continueing the discussion so let's agree to disagree.

@ OP: Get the 560 out of the two.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree with you, but if op can I'd say get the 660. . or 560 ti. 560 and 560 ti are still way overpriced seeing as 40 bucks more gets you a 600 series. Mind you a 560 doesn't have the hardware a 570 does, but a 560 has the same set as a 570. and the 50 series is just throwing your money away.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

poor bus, wouldn't ba...buy.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i still have the graphics card that came with my latop. intel HD 3000

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's a shame that there hasn't been more focus on laptop graphics cards. They been around for a long time now and many people do game on them. Sure there are gaming PC's but very little in the way of aftermarket upgrades.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i would say i agree but i have no idea what is happening in this thread. (i have no knowledge on these sorts of things) i pretty much just came in here to say that my graphics card probably isn't the best one out there

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think it was OCZ that tried selling barebones laptops that you could add whatever components you wanted to, but it failed miserably :(

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

consider that even if its MAX resolution is X, doesn't mean it preforms well in games at that resolution. Also IMO, stick with 256 bit bus atleast.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't like the card, too low end for my tastes. I would get a GTX 670, I own the GTX 570 and it rocks.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

using 550 ti on rig (c2d 3.0 wolfdale, everything runs fine for me. Then again, for the most part as long as my games run at 1920x1600 and have 2x AA on, im satisfied

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 1 decade ago by TuneTu.