Do you think that...

I cant really say, to be honest. Granted, I do have a lot of games that I love from those times, but I also have a lot of stuff I love now.

The thing about past years looking better is usually just nostalgia kicking in. There were as much dry times then as there is now.

yep

heroes 6 - shit

csgo - shit

a lot of games - shit

I think the quality of the experience has gotten better through better graphics but in the current generation there has been too many prequels/sequels and not enough creativity in the storytelling. Yes there are a few games that come out each year that nail it through storytelling combined with game play. But im personally sick of seeing the same game released over and over. I want a new story.

That's why i'm into indie games, they bring something new and unique to the industry while the big developers fap over their profits.

I think it's probably the same but we tend to remember only the good stuff.

It was more about content then, now its all about graphics and dlcs. And this drives you to buy better computer everytime which i hate, you spend money on something and before it dies (which used to work for anything), you just replace it with the new one.

There are few exceptions obviously, but most of the old titles are better than the most recent ones. Fact being that companies usually like to aim for new shiny things, improving visual quality and most of the time the storyline/gameplay ends up being awfull or not spicy enough.

I always prefered better storyline and gameplay over graphics, hell i even consider a nice selection of music to be better than graphics quality in most of the games.

They were. But then again, nostalgia ain't what it used to be.

On a serious note, I'd say franchise games have more often than not gone worse in recent years, but there are always some great new ones. Also, as we experience may games over the years, a game that is say slightly better than a similar one that's you play a few years back wouldn't have the same wow effect on you as the first one - as you already encountered something similar.

Also games are a growing marked and a much bigger one each year. But quantity doesn't always make for quality.

Mostly yes! 2003 was probably the best year for videogames EVER!

Can't really generalize. There is a whole lot of mindless tools (so called fanboys) which will crap their pants once their big lovers Electronic Farts or Craptivision release a new game and pay everything for it and NEVER see any flaw.
So you can only get subjective opinions.

I for one rather love a very well thought story than amazing graphics.
I could easily say that Indigo Prophecy / Fahrenheit was one of the best games I played and it came out in what.. like 2006?
Deus Ex which came out in 2000 was amazing and had a terrible AI but lots of potential in the story, also the voice acting was terrible, yet I still consider it one of the best games ever.
in 2010 Amnesia was released and I played it in 2012 and it's another one of those games which KEPT ME in the story, I wanted to find out wtf is going on, like a book which you begin reading in bed and don't realize it slowly gets 5 AM. Yeah that's my criteria for a GOOD game. I consider Terraria or Binding of Isaac a FUN game, because the randomness and freedom is something appealing, but they are below the aforementioned games.
FAllout is also somewhere there, sadly Fallout 3's mainstory was too short, but New Vegas kicks ass there.

No, they werent.
But on other hand games from 92-99 were better than 2000-2010.

No, I don't think so.
There currently are a lot of crappy new games out there. There are also quite a number of great new games out there.
There are quite a number of old great games out there. There are also a huge number of really really bad old games out there, but people tend not to remember those, because, hey - they weren't very memorable, so why would you remember them ?.
Generally speaking, games in general nowadays probably aren't worse than games in general from 2005 or 2000. Or 1995. Or 1990.

Franchises, on the other hand, do have a tendency to get worse and worse after a certain point, but frankly, that is not something that's limited to games, and is to be expected.

As for the whole oh-noes-games-are-becoming-more-visually-flashy-at-the-expense-of-gameplay argument: That has been going on for at least 20 years now. There have always been games that sacrificed gameplay and/or story in favor of graphics. That doesn't make a whole generation of games bad.