By my calculations, my lifetime won't be enough for me to 100% or even try out all the... checks number... 1780 games?! Sheesh, when did I get that many?! I thought I was around 1600... Anyway, yes, I do. >.<
Yes, 1.9k is probably too many when considering that as per SteamDB you have only played 34% of them (and that includes idling, or anything else which might not really be playing). That would probably mean you can easy never replay any game and still be able to get by for a few years without getting any new game (your avg time per game, 14.3 * num of unplayed games, 1,197 = 17,117.1 hours).
However, that's still a lot better than a lot of people here on SG. In fact I am not doing that great either. I have a smaller library but I can feel myself approaching the same situation.
Anyway, I think there's nothing wrong with it either. I mean as long as you at least try the game, or have honest intention of playing it, it's worth having it in your library. That's just my opinion.
That is better than I thought - I hadn't actually checked my stats. I got a lot (maybe most) of my games through bundles where I only wanted one or two and didn't care about the rest - so I think 34% played is pretty good!
I don't idle - cards and badges aren't my thing. That's solely playing time.
I have... a lot. Back in the days I was a Bundle and Greenlight Fanatic XD (Groupees was great!) So... many "not so good" games are in the long list, unfortunately. I got better and even if I still like bundles, I am very strict with myself choosing, so now I only get games I really want to play :) ...someday. Because I play so infrequently, it seems like I am still hoarding ^^'
Is 1,677 games a lot? Yes. Is it too many? I don't know...
Comment has been collapsed.
By my calculations, my lifetime won't be enough for me to 100% or even try out all the... checks number... 1780 games?! Sheesh, when did I get that many?! I thought I was around 1600... Anyway, yes, I do. >.<
Um... thank you for the giveaway... ^_^'
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, 1.9k is probably too many when considering that as per SteamDB you have only played 34% of them (and that includes idling, or anything else which might not really be playing). That would probably mean you can easy never replay any game and still be able to get by for a few years without getting any new game (your avg time per game, 14.3 * num of unplayed games, 1,197 = 17,117.1 hours).
However, that's still a lot better than a lot of people here on SG. In fact I am not doing that great either. I have a smaller library but I can feel myself approaching the same situation.
Anyway, I think there's nothing wrong with it either. I mean as long as you at least try the game, or have honest intention of playing it, it's worth having it in your library. That's just my opinion.
Comment has been collapsed.
That is better than I thought - I hadn't actually checked my stats. I got a lot (maybe most) of my games through bundles where I only wanted one or two and didn't care about the rest - so I think 34% played is pretty good!
I don't idle - cards and badges aren't my thing. That's solely playing time.
Comment has been collapsed.
In that case, these stats are not bad imo.
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks
Comment has been collapsed.
I have... a lot. Back in the days I was a Bundle and Greenlight Fanatic XD (Groupees was great!) So... many "not so good" games are in the long list, unfortunately. I got better and even if I still like bundles, I am very strict with myself choosing, so now I only get games I really want to play :) ...someday. Because I play so infrequently, it seems like I am still hoarding ^^'
Comment has been collapsed.