Oh man, I hadn't seen you spamming in public lv 0 GAs for a while. Thought maybe we'd finally moved past all that. But hey, changing up the formula I see! Now it's a copy pasta link to the previous copy pasta. That's a neat trick. Anyways, here comes the same old song and dance:
If you got more questions, feel free to ask.
Yeah I have a question. Why do you insist on continuing to copy/paste the same spam encouraging long-time users to treat newcomers with skepticism and distrust until they effectively buy their way into using the site? In addition to refusing to acknowledge evidence (and mods!) suggesting your crusade is both misguided and misinformed.
this offer clearly wasn't addressed to you, since you are blacklisted and can't follow the link to one of my GAs and you still take the audacitiy to bother me once again, when i already told you that i don't care about your bullshit
not to mention spreading lies about evidence, which you don't even have and mods, when just ONE mod told BOTH OF US to stop our discussion, but you're always twisting the truth, so that it suits your opinion
Thought maybe we'd finally moved past all that.
we are only behind all that, if the owner is taking action against the huge amount of bad accounts once again and there would be no need anymore for setting up level restrictions, but i doubt you'd understand the issue, as you have proven the last 10 or so times
I didn't contribute to this site in calculable monetary worth, but still don't consider myself being a bad account because I enter only giveaways I manually checked that I don't have the games on any platform. I am grateful for people giving higher-value giveaways without high entry restrictions - it kind of feels very "direct democratic" or even anarchic. If there are (too) many "bad accounts" - and i can totally imagine there are - maybe there have to be better alternatives to identify and restrict them than to discourage contributors of giveaways from giving away to the "general public"?
maybe there have to be better alternatives to identify and restrict them than to discourage contributors of giveaways from giving away to the "general public"?
we have thought about that and i know setting level restrictions isn't ideal, because we repurposed this tool, but it's the only viable solution to the problem we came up with
thank you for the giveaway, maybe you'll find this information useful
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh man, I hadn't seen you spamming in public lv 0 GAs for a while. Thought maybe we'd finally moved past all that. But hey, changing up the formula I see! Now it's a copy pasta link to the previous copy pasta. That's a neat trick. Anyways, here comes the same old song and dance:
Yeah I have a question. Why do you insist on continuing to copy/paste the same spam encouraging long-time users to treat newcomers with skepticism and distrust until they effectively buy their way into using the site? In addition to refusing to acknowledge evidence (and mods!) suggesting your crusade is both misguided and misinformed.
Comment has been collapsed.
this offer clearly wasn't addressed to you, since you are blacklisted and can't follow the link to one of my GAs and you still take the audacitiy to bother me once again, when i already told you that i don't care about your bullshit
not to mention spreading lies about evidence, which you don't even have and mods, when just ONE mod told BOTH OF US to stop our discussion, but you're always twisting the truth, so that it suits your opinion
we are only behind all that, if the owner is taking action against the huge amount of bad accounts once again and there would be no need anymore for setting up level restrictions, but i doubt you'd understand the issue, as you have proven the last 10 or so times
Comment has been collapsed.
I didn't contribute to this site in calculable monetary worth, but still don't consider myself being a bad account because I enter only giveaways I manually checked that I don't have the games on any platform. I am grateful for people giving higher-value giveaways without high entry restrictions - it kind of feels very "direct democratic" or even anarchic. If there are (too) many "bad accounts" - and i can totally imagine there are - maybe there have to be better alternatives to identify and restrict them than to discourage contributors of giveaways from giving away to the "general public"?
Comment has been collapsed.
we have thought about that and i know setting level restrictions isn't ideal, because we repurposed this tool, but it's the only viable solution to the problem we came up with
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the answer. Managing and moderating social media-like formats like this may be more taxing than I anticipated.
Comment has been collapsed.
i like this :) (the message from wiksolop72 & marilynhanson that is)
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the giveaway!
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the giveaway!
Comment has been collapsed.
thanks! ♥
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks for the giveaway!
Comment has been collapsed.
Que juegazo, ojala y ganarlo, muchas gracias
Comment has been collapsed.
спасибо
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks!!
Comment has been collapsed.
Ty! <3
Comment has been collapsed.
Ty! <3
Comment has been collapsed.
Thx
Comment has been collapsed.
:((
Comment has been collapsed.
tyvm :)
Comment has been collapsed.