Playtime offline isn't recorded by Steam, so I'm against this proposal as I don't think it should be a requirement that people be connected to the internet whilst playing.
See in my case Osmos and World of Goo. Steam says I've barely played them, reality would put me well over 10 hours for both.
Comment has been collapsed.
+1 Also, what if the gifter wins the game but realizes he cannot play for a while because he has a tough period in life and doesn't get much time for games at all. Based on what you say, he would loose hid gift just because he is having a tough time in life.
Oh, and how exactly do you propose that a gift be removed from a person's steam account? Once the gift is received, it is tied to that person's account. You cannot get it back to reroll- unless if he hasn't activated it.
Comment has been collapsed.
@Rand I can see the problem with that, but what I'm proposing is just a set time played. Unless you want to stay offline mode for the rest of your life, I wouldn't say that it would be hard getting let's say 100 hours eventually.
And @h4r5h4v3ng3r, the point is that you have to have the requirement of playing before you can join.
Comment has been collapsed.
i don't like this idea. if i play one game for hours, that does not mean, i'll play another game for hours. so that won't stop me from ignoring my gift.
a better idea would be to make the user play his new gift for at least 10 hours before getting another gift..:) well.. yes, everything is exploitable...:)
and there should be a legit way to baypass that restriction by giving away something else in exchange
and that exchange gift should not be some exploited game, like HIB, DM MP, Eets, Dirt3, ..., or some cheap/free DLC
Comment has been collapsed.
Suggestion make all your suggestions in one thread and dont spam the forums with suggestion threads.
Comment has been collapsed.
I disagree, the serious gamers I know all have a backlog of games they need to get around to, myself included. Just because a new game isn't played much or even at all within the first week or even month, doesn't mean it isn't going to be enjoyed.
Comment has been collapsed.
If you really want to know someone will use your gift, then you should give it to someone that really wants it. By putting it on steamgifts as a public giveaway, you run the risk that the person who wins won't appreciate the gift as much as you want them to. Example, I entered a bunch of frozenbyte bundles just because I thought splot looked cute. Since splot isn't even out yet, it looks like I haven't touched the bundle (well I did play trine, it's pretty fun). But if the giver wanted me to play every game in the bundle the week I won it, well, they're out of luck.
Comment has been collapsed.
46 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by Mayanaise
47,380 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by ManOman
29 Comments - Last post 48 minutes ago by medion
210 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Heathh
315 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Formidolosus
6 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by tariko
81 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by BarbaricGenie
10,133 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
16 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by Vasharal
4 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Mayanaise
128 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by pontare
34 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by akfas
16,372 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by johndoe19
6,829 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Fettan
Now, many gifters will be pissed off that once the recipient got the gift, they won't be playing it. The gifter can ask for a reroll so then it can be hopefully gifted to a more active person, but how about making it a requirement in order to enter giveaways? I know this can be easily bypassed by idling in TF2, but this is just an idea right now. I haven't thought of the exact details yet.
Comment has been collapsed.