DSLRs cost at least $500 where I live...but a lot of their functions and picture quality are a lot better than standard cameras. But I'm not particularly adept with using cameras, so I'm unsure as to if I should get a DSLR (it'd be entry level if I did though). Digital cameras are much cheaper on the other hand, but offer much less in terms of features and picture quality.

So with that said, which do you people prefer? Is the higher price worth the quality or not in your opinion?

Oh yeah...some giveaways... (don't spoil answers, though you may discuss hints)

9 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Check out Olympus and Sony mirrorless lines if you're not ready to make the jump to DSLR. But the Nikon 3200/3300 come with a great "guide mode" that's really handy with an entry level DSLR. Be sure to get another lens beyond your default 18-55 as well, I recommend a 55-200 or 55-300 for a nice second lens.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Slightly off-topic -- I work in the publishing industry. This guy isn't all that wrong. Have a cheap camera on you at all times. I'm not talking about a cellphone with a built-in camera. A $5 camera isn't an option either (in my opinion), but something in the range of $40 to $60 should do fine. The reason is quite simple: You need to build up your own collection of stock images. Since they're likely going to undergo a fair bit of retouching (via computer) anyway, you don't need to use the absolute best to capture these.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 4 years ago.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Solved the first one so have a bump, I don't have the CV for anything though so I stopped after fiddling with the second for a little while. Unfortunately I don't know anything about cameras!

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A DSLR camera is great, if you plan on getting a few different lenses to do different things. Long distance shots, close up shots and stuff like that. They are also good because if I remember right, DSLRs have far more options for controlling stuff like shutter speed, exposure length and all that kind of stuff. DSLRs will also usually do stuff like burst mode where you can just hold down the button and it will take lots of shots in a row. Non-DSLRs can do this too, but they are usually not as fast and/or limited to 3 to 10 in a row and thats it. Burst mode is really good for trying to get a picture something moving fast, like a car going by, or trying to get a really good shot of lightning in the sky. There is also generally far more attachments that can hook up to DSLRs.

Generally a regular camera will do just fine for most people. You can get up pretty close and get some decent pictures, you can take some decent long distance shots though not too long distance. Many also have little rings just around the lens which allows you to screw on other lenses which allows the optical zoom to be better, or put on some sort of filter.

I've got a Kodak easyshare z712is. Its older and only 7mega pixel but it takes some nice pictures. It also has the little rings on the outside of the lens to attach some extra lenses though I have not bought any myself.

I would suggest going to a store for a hands on look at the cameras and see if they have the little rings on them.

Just remember these things. The higher the megapixel the better. I believe 14 to 20 MP is actually common now (been a while since I looked at cameras). Optical zoom is better then digital zoom so the higher it is the better zooming in on stuff will be. Check to see what kind of batteries it takes either AA or special expensive ones, or both. My camera can actually take both AA and the special batteries. Most cameras take SD cards I believe, and the larger it takes the better, also you can get some SD cards that can take data from the camera really fast, you will pay more for them, but if your camera can take the size it will be better in the long run. Pretty much all cameras will now take 1080p 30fps video too.

Hope this helps at little and just didn't make things more confusing.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The higher the megapixel the better. - no no no, just no
I have dslr alfa500 and a hybrid lumix dmc-fz28 and i almost always use the smaller hybrid (mostly take it for my mountans bike trips). It doesnt weight that much and makes good pictures. But now even smaller cameras are good for everyday use. Just go through some forums or photo sites, read some tests and choose.
Some time ago i saw small sony camera and it got perfect pictures. It was amazing, how the technology for small cameras went so far.
If you are not a photographer then i strongly suggest buy cheaper and smaller one for start. After some tome you can judge if you want sth more, but you will not. Or maybe buy some used one dslr and then you will sell it later when you see that it isnt handy and comfortable :) (sry for my englsh)

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You sound unsure, I am a photographer, as great as DSLR's are some P&S are pretty amazing, examples:

DSLR
DSLR
DSLR

P&S
P&S
P&S

It's more about what YOU can do, then what the camera can do, the DSLR gives you better grip, better depth of field usually, bit more clarity due to lenses(More choices also) size, etc...

I am sure the P&S here is probably under 200 bucks by now, it was 500 years ago when I got it, the dslr i use you can grab for 300 and chnage on ebay, don't be afraid to buy used, just ask for a shutter count to make sure its not super used.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ask yourself what do you want to do.

Are you interested in photography and want to learn more about it, make lots of photos, edit and retouch them? Basically, is it going to be your hobby? If so, get a DSLR.

Do you need high quality and lots of control for something particular, like a job of some kind (journalism, doing on-site photo documentation)? Get a DSLR or a mirrorless camera.

If you want to just snap some pics here and there, have something better than a camera phone to take on vacation, get a good point&shoot. If you already know that P&S are too crappy for you for this purpose, get a mirrorless.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It takes a lot of time and practice to master a DSLR.

If you just need pictures then a normal camera is good.
On the other hand, if you need great quality pictures, you'll have to be patient and learn all the manual controls of the DSLR.

A DSLR on auto mode is slightly better than normal so not worth the extra cost.

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Bump for solved!

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

/casually laughs at "normal cameras"
/cries because dslrs aren't the norm

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I have a dslr, a canon eos 700d I bought it as a gift to my father but pretty much sits in there untouched. The picture quality is actually great even if I can barely use it, much better than a samsung compact camera I have (duh, really? never thought about that!).
If you want to buy one as a hobby or just to play around I'd suggest you to get a good one it will last quite a lot, look on the internet usually there are great prices (here in stores the price difference can be even more than 200€ than buying it on amazon), there are a lo of nice entry level ones: canon eos 600d, eos 700d, eos 1100d, nikon 3200/3300, nikon 5200, pentax k50, etc.

Some pic I took: click1, click2
Yeah I suck :p

9 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.