Guys, you should leave him alone. Yes, you should call him out on what he has done. But don't go looking for stuff. Don't post his name, images of him, and where he lives. That in my opinion is worse.
Comment has been collapsed.
Alright, closing thread. It seems that this thing derailed from discussion to a witch hunt. Since the OP feels the same way, I'm going to go ahead and close the thread.
Comment has been collapsed.
39 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by anditsung
3 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Adamdoodles
13 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Adamdoodles
5 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by BattleChaing
14 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Ld7
277 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Bin246
3 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Jinxtah
81 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by MarshallBanana0815
1,216 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by canis39
201 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Cactus123
592 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by imurx
415 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by m0r1arty
257 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Axelflox
8 Comments - Last post 50 minutes ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
Interesting drama over at Hookups. It appears the group has been going crazy with referral links, and there are accusations that ownership is profiteering. The admins and mods have effectively risen up against ownership.
While this may be construed as calling out [I think this is more about the ethics and real mission of the group, though I guess it's hard to separate from the owner], given that many of us are members of the group and not everyone receives the announcements, I thought it was worth posting.
The ethics of the situation may make some question whether they want to continue being members there. I, for one, will be leaving the group.
Below announcement / thread for your reference:
Today's announcement posted by an upset admin
Thread discussing the problems
Mods, if this is inappropriate, please feel free to delete this thread. But I would prefer if this be kept up given the content and issues at play. Thanks.
EDIT: The above links are no longer valid, as the announcement(s) and discussion(s) have been deleted. There are links scattered throughout the replies that will provide historical screen shots. I'm reluctant to paste those here, as it almost gets to a point where it's piling on, but it has been pointed out that the situation is what it is and people can form their own opinions based on the evidence.
EDIT: Okay, I read through the chat transcript posted in the thread, and 1) I genuinely feel stupider after reading the entire thing, and 2) just because you don't like how the owner manages his site does not give anyone license to screw with his site or harass him. Since when does being an ass (some people's apparent opinion) justify disproportionate retribution? Leave him be.
EDIT: It's getting to a point where the discussion has just devolved into bashing the owner. The amount of hate just because the guy's exhibited schmuck-like behavior is a little over-the-top. I'll close this thread at ~8.30pm EST on Friday, August 30, 2013. If you have anything valuable to contribute, speak your peace before we put this thread to bed.
Comment has been collapsed.