It reads as legal should, at least good enough to hold up in any court as it is worded fine. Maybe missing or wrong punctuation.
Comment has been collapsed.
including by, [but] not limited to, trading......., or regifting
Comment has been collapsed.
I meant the [but] the [ ] that is what I shook my head about.
Comment has been collapsed.
Isn't it also missing a comma after including? So it should read including, but not limited to, trading, selling, or regifting.
Comment has been collapsed.
It is trying to state by trading, selling, or regifting; but not limited to. Something like that. It does read funny, but is fine for who it is for.
Comment has been collapsed.
yup, there should be commas or dashes before and after "but not limited to". at least that's how it is in turkish.
Comment has been collapsed.
Personally I feel like there might also be to many/misplaced commata but you are right, the by definitely must be a but.
Comment has been collapsed.
maybe 'yet' as the term as but could be contradictory and the word yet adds to it or extends a blanket of coverage... Oh fuck it. time to pour another shot.
Comment has been collapsed.
The fact is "including, but not limited to" is common phrasing in legal documents. That's just a typo in the terms here.
Now stop trying to drink and do grammar at the same time. :P
Comment has been collapsed.
Yet I will still do so but I will not stop. I would use the word Yet. And even maybe Yetti.
Comment has been collapsed.
my brfain is below 10%, have some kind of flu and type wht gloves, so i don´g care about tpyos anymore
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.