The Steam Support has deleted a screenshot that I have uploaded some time ago, I'm not complaining, it was Inappropriate and must be deleted.

But the thing I can't understand is why this content (which is Inappropriate to the community) can be added to the games.

It's not more logical to limit this content in games instead of delete one by one the screenshots uploaded by the users?

This is the answer from Steam's Support

Games are accessible only to those who own them, while the community is accessible to all of Steam's users. Many games also have content patches that make it very challenging to determine what content is officially part of the game and what content is not.

Even if the content is from a game, we have chosen to apply the above rules when other users have reported it as inappropriate.

(Before continue I want to keep clear that I haven't added any "nude" mod to the game. The screenshot was of the default content included on it).

Therefore, the content is appropriate only for those who buy the game, because (I guess) they accept that this content was added to it, even if it's bought by a child. So what is the point of protecting users from the content available in the community, if that content is available in the games anyway and the same child they're trying to protect can buy it?

Not misunderstand me, I'm not saying that this content should be removed from Steam Store, I'm just trying to understand why it can be added to the games if it is inappropriate to the community.

(I hope you can understand what I've write. This is not my native language, but I'm trying).

6 years ago

Comment has been collapsed.

"Games are accessible only to those who own them, while the community is accessible to all of Steam's users." Is responsability of a parent what the child buys with the credit card but you are resonsable of posting the capture. Pretty self-explanatory. Sorry for your loss anyway.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But the game can be bought by anyone, so that content is available for everyone anyway.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, but steam is supossed to need credit card, paypal, gifts cards, etc only an adult cand provide so a child playing Gta V for example that cost 45 euros on sale is responsability of the parents. If your profile is public anyone can enter. Censorship not always make sense anyway.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's more like, when you purchase/play a game, you agree with an invisible agreement that you understand what you're getting involved with (usually through ESRB rating, game info, etc). By using Steam, you also agree to an agreement, which requires the account creator to be 13 years old or older. Some content on Steam is 14+ however, with the intention of being played by a more mature audience.

Therefore, while some games are 14+, the Steam community itself is 13+ which is the reason content deemed inappropriate for the 13+ community will be removed if reported (blame reporters for being dumb shits).

My only question is, why not just make a "mature" filter, and allow users to tag their content as "mature". Then you could choose to enable or disable mature content via Steam options. It would solve every problem - mature content would be isolated to a mature audience, and anyone else would be blocked off from viewing the content.

But you know. This is Valve. They mostly care about squeezing out a few more dollars from their users than making the Steam community remotely convenient.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

what i consider inappropriate could be wildly different to what you consider inappropriate. So should all games be nothing more than a 2d side scroller like Mario, just to avoid possible inappropriate content? Or should we gat a broader choice and by buying a product, we take all responsibility? I personally don't mind watching porn but consider it wildly inappropriate for my children, I wouldn't share that with them. So why can't steam users use the same common sense instead of banning everything?

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just waned to add, I have also had a screenshot removed but for different reasons... I play Atlas Reactor and they released a skin by accident for a non-released character, so I got one of the first screenshots of him. took all of about 2 hours to be removed.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Steam runs a business and so they allow developers to add/remove patches to make it available for everyone if the content is too mature. Prime example is Nekopara which originally has H scenes but to make it available for community the developers removed the inappropriate content. The users apply the same patch again which makes the H scenes visible again which Steam can't do anything about except to remove screenshots as you said. It is a small price to pay for the benefit which both Steam and the developers can get. This is what I understand.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't disagree, but I do think it's a bit hypocritical that they make VNs, dating sims, and generally any anime-based games do that, while other titles, like the Witcher series, Duke Nukem, etc., can include nudity and adult objectives without post-purchase patching. I get that the "ecchi" games focus on that, rather than having it be just part of the game, and even an optional part a lot of the time, but it still doesn't seem equitable.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I guess think about it like...

okay, have you ever been in a gas station, and they have nudie magazines behind mostly-opaque plastic on the top rack in the back, out of reach and hidden from children?

There's a difference between you picking up the magazine, buying it and going home, and you picking up the magazine, opening it up, and displaying the NSFW content openly in the store for anyone to see if they look in your direction. In the second case, the management would probably ask you to not do that.

It's not a 1:1 analogue but I can see where they're coming from. Also consider nudity laws are different in different countries, and Valve has to be concerned with that.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Your argument is very faulty. Whether or not a game is available for anyone to buy is irrelevant. It seems that you only have in mind horny teens who you think would like to get their hands on some soft porn anyways. What about people who strictly want to avoid certain types of imagery? People can buy anything on Steam, but most people will buy only content that they want to see, and by taking out sensitive content and making it visible to all your friends in the activity feed, as well as the wider Steam community, you are likely to offend, shock or hurt people who never signed up for porn or violence.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That was just an example to try to put it on perspective, it's obvious that there will be people with different reasons. And I'm not asking what are those reasons.

And why you talk like I have uploaded that screenshot with some weird intentions? There are many context in which it could be uploaded and you just pick the worst of them.

6 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sorry, I definitely didn't think that you uploaded a screenshot because you were weird or pervy or whatever else (really, nothing wrong with nudity IMO), it's jjust what I had in mind when I tried to explain what Steam is trying to prevent generally.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Doesn't a game with an explicit content require the user to fill in his date of birth before accessing the store page?

Maybe they could offer an option of marking your screenshot as such as well, requiring filling date of birth to access it as well.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think it's more likely that Steam doesn't care but they do not want to draw the negative attention of groups that do. By censoring what is publicly available they significantly decrease their chance of becoming a target. Another possibility is that this is done to avoid being added to a net nanny censorship database which would almost certainly negatively affect sales.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Its about being Legal. When a young kid goes to look at the Witcher 3 game it asks for them to put in their birthday. Steam is not at fault if the kid enters a fake date to see the content. When a kid goes to your profile though, there is no age verification, so the kiddie can see that nude screenshot you took to "save" for "later." It is hard for them to put an age verification on user content so if someone reports it then they take it down. I guess they could just add a thing where you can flag your stuff as mature so people have to go through age verification to get to your stuff. Steam doesn't really care, but i'm sure Steam lawyers care as showing mature content to kiddies wouldn't go well for them in court.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.