The only times I have a problem with microtransactions in games, is when the items in question turn the game into a "pay to win" sort of game. That, and when the price is too high for what you get. 10-20 USD for 1-4 maps is WAY too much.
Comment has been collapsed.
330 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by WaxWorm
6 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by doomofdoom
6 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Ewoda
114 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by tungmapu
75 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by PicoMan
11 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by adam1224
15 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by axolotlprime
17,673 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Atro
21 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by Lugum
213 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Swiftter99
4,009 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by blalilulelo
262 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by mourinhos86
1,614 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by molderko
11 Comments - Last post 42 minutes ago by Axelflox
I ask this because I see people complaining all the time about it and I can't seem to see the problem when it is done right.
Sure I understand the hate if a system is used to exploit the gamers, content that is OP or locked without access, especially in multiplayer games.
However why would you complain about it in a single player game? A recent example is Plants V.S. Zombies 2.
PvZ2 released for FREE on Android and ios, right? And yet people complained about the micro transactions in game.
PvZ released for $20 when it released and yet people were fine with that price. but when PvZ2 releases with a total of $25.90 in microtrasactions, if you bought EVERY SINGLE ONE, and that is frowned upon, why?
Comment has been collapsed.