Wow, my avatar on steam has been removed.

So you are saying that no Muslims like jihad? And where exactly did I said that ?

In an other thread this morning, you were accused of putting words in other people's mouth. You are doing it again here. There is no use to talk to you.

Okay, let's not drift too far before it become messy.

What I wanted to point out was that SJW are not the root of all f¤cking evil like some people like to say.

No, SJW don't support jihad, but profile with jihad pic aren't removed from steam -> SJW don't control Valve and Steam. People should stop blaming SJW for everything displeasing them., duuh.

Not that long ago it was that West enforcing particularly Sodomy laws in many places, e.g. on the African continent, telling everyone that it is what God wants. Not that long ago e.g. Sir Douglas Haig was celebrated for sending 2 million boys to their death because... victory. And many of that West even say that all the victims of the strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a (sad) necessity.

So not really issues that would have been recently totally foreign to that West, and depictions of these issues as if Europe had liberal values already since the Roman empire whereas everyone else as if in need of some more invasions to enlarge plantation holdings of a few who are not shy to sacrifice many a life for their profit, to me such doesn't seem as an academical criticism neither. Respectivly, if one is critical of Islam for this and that, how come the same persons are not critical of Christianity too because inquisition and plenty of stuff? E.g. Adolf Hitler, from dominantly Roman Catholic Austria, claimed repeatedly that he sees himself a tool of divine providence... and is that a reason to blame all of Christianity for Adolf Hitler?

That said, not that there wouldn't be anything to be critical about. E.g. in the U.S. apparently in every state corporal punishment at home is legally permitted and in about half of the states corporal punishment at schools is legally permitted - and all that apparently because of wild interpretation of a verse in the Bible which doesn't really say that it is ok for a father to beat child but many do claim that it says that (which it doesn't say tho). Or e.g. in Saudi Arabia the king claims mono-authority on worldly and religious affairs with "citizen" not even having a parliament of theirs to be represented in, all while e.g. Ibn Saud did care little for established rules of Islamic denomination when he had more than a dozen wives he as alleged religious authority apparently claimed to be ok in his case tho - and who then apparently was plenty of inspiration to e.g. Saddam under who there were schools for "priests" serving him or for ISIL which apparently thought they could repeat what Saudis did even tho in this case they had not that support Saudis had from the U.S. in financing plenty through Aramaco.

But these issues are about different things than argumentation of some who make it sound as if because Tarkin ordered in Star Wars Episode IV even a whole planet to be destroyed, as if every perpetrator were innocent with Star Wars to be blamed for every crime that happens, and additionally them even going as far as calling some sadist a typical Christian/Muslim and by that making it look as if that sadism were what God wants instead of them abiding by established academical standards in which it wasn't emphasized that a drug cartel is "Christian" - where some of the members perhaps wear a cross and consider their doing justified by some interpretation of theirs of some verses, but their doing in context of that cartel has not anything religious about it, does it?

I know, right? Everyone knows it's pronounced hyeef.

And they were right, legs are a mistake. So clumsy and inefficient. Billions of years of work and evolution couldn't even come up with wheels. I'm starting to think it's not the best process for designing life.

No, haha, definitely not.
At your comment and how unabashedly blunt it is. I like blunt.