If they put exactly same giveaway conditions then indeed it doesn't make any sense, but that's up to giveaway creator and his/her preferences. They don't receive any benefits from creating giveaways like this, apart from forcing people interested in all copies to pay price multiplied by number of copies they want to join for.
This might be the only valid reason for doing it like this, but I doubt that anybody actually creates those giveaways for this reason - they simply don't know or don't want to know.
Comment has been collapsed.
With single copy giveaways, you can easily skim down your giveaway list and see who's marked it and who hasn't. With multiple copy giveaways, it waits until every single winner has marked it before there's any indicator that any of them got it. I like to follow up and make sure the game gets activated, so multi-copy giveaways actually make things a little more of a hassle for me in the end.
Comment has been collapsed.
20 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by Gamy7
422 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Atombomb2097
211 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by NebraskaJones
60 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Microfish
1,351 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Microfish
556 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Microfish
10 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by medion
41 Comments - Last post 19 seconds ago by Mitsukuni
355 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by GreyF0xx
50 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by adam1224
428 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by GreyF0xx
614 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by lino1000
107 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by madjoki
234 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by kingphin
I see many public giveaways for the same games made by the same person. They are all the same level too (mostly level 0 or 1). They all start and end at the same time. Why do people do this rather than use the "number of copies" function? Is there an advantage to doing them this way or is it that these people don't understand how the function works?
Comment has been collapsed.