I think fx8320/50 would be a much better choice for future games, since your current cpu would bore that r9 to death.
Comment has been collapsed.
Why don't you go ahead and research yourself a little? There are tons of benchmarks and tests for graphics cards, you can then proceed filtering out the one you want, depending on heat generation, cooling solution (Noise and efficiency), if the card is OCed more than others etc.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think the best time to buy is 2 years into the console generation. At that point you should be able to get hardware that will easily last you for the generation at a fair price. If that is too much of a wait then at least wait for the next generation of GPUs as those will most likely feature a die shrink and with it a significant boost in performance. Your CPU is not bad but it's likely that in some cases it will be the bottleneck if paired with a top line GPU. Consider whether or not you will upgrade it at the time you are upgrading your GPU, not earlier.
Comment has been collapsed.
Your CPU is too weak for any better GPU, it would be a waste of money to upgrade to anything better.
Either upgrade to FX-8350 or change to i5-3570K with a new motherboard, something like ASUS Z77-A. Also, change the PSU immediately! That thing is a ticking time bomb.
I would go with Intel, you'll see a bigger gain especially in games.
Comment has been collapsed.
Stay away from this first set of cards. It's the HD2900XTX all over again with them (at least with stock cooling), or if you prefer then it's AMD going Fermi. Rather wait for the refined cards that will be coming later on (likely to answer whatever nVidia has planned for March-April), or at least more new cards using the new architecture.
And you definitely need a new Power Supply either way cuz that thing is weak junk despite the supposed (max-rated, not continuous) 600W label.
Comment has been collapsed.
Go with R9 280x from Gigabyte , it has 1 Ghz GPU clock and 1.1 Ghz Boost. R9 280x is a HD 7970 Ghz edition rebranded , so it much better than HD 6950.Your CPU will not bottleneck this videocard , even if you use stock freq.
Windforce 3x is a good cooler , my HD 7950 overclocked 1100/1500 it has 34 Celsius idle and 67 Celsius full load.
Take a look here , a HD 7970 overclocked with all processors in benchmarks.
http://lab501.ro/placi-video/gigabyte-radeon-hd-7970-oc-partea-iv-scalare-cu-procesorul
This site is in romanian language so you must translate it in english.
Comment has been collapsed.
7 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by pb1
0 Comments - Created 13 minutes ago by pb1
16,403 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by MLD
47,139 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by kbronct
31 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by NoctuaVentus
20 Comments - Last post 56 minutes ago by OneManArmyStar
1,952 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Ashtart
264 Comments - Last post 32 seconds ago by zeprfrew
46 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by Keny123456
39 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by ChrisKutcher
6,950 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by stabilo102
2,097 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by Pebbletool
124 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by Vampus
9,463 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by fenrir3778
So, you guys helped many people around here with PCs.
I've built myself computer like last year with these specs:
I was thinking of getting AMD's R9 280X, I can't go with 290 I don't have enough money. I want to play games at high/ultra on 1920x1080 resolution.
What do you think?
P.S. I live in Bosnia, and I don't have much choice, I can only choose from these 280X:
So if you tell me to go with 280X please tell me which one to choose. If something is unclear please ask and I'll do my best to make it clear.
Btw: 280X around here in Bosnia is 600KM which is equal to something around 300€ and that's how much money I have.
Comment has been collapsed.