lol

No, no, no. The rest of the United States is laughing at all the retards who refinanced their homes into a SUPER LOW RATE APR so they could spend money they didn't have to buy a new car and big screen TV they couldn't afford.

Well, dumb people making dumb choices while dealing with companys that allows it is not the same as EA's policy. I mean seeing the whole "democracy" and law system, and the way they let dumb people do F-ed up shiet is kinda scares me as a guy who lives in EU. Sure, there always will be rules that let companys suck money out of dumb people, but e.g. you mentioned bank of america, well you could go to other banks, who offer more suitable deals, but in EA's case they pretty much bought the sport franchise rights, whole dev studios, so if you want to play those games you can't just go to an another publisher to play those games of that sort.

Sure, this seems like "nothing" compared to real world issues, but there you have a choice, a lot of companys make the same products, services, you can chose, but since EA bought franchises and studios, you can't just get an another ME with a working multiplayer structure instead of the peer-to-peer garbage. You can't just play EA's games at an another developer, where you can get the contents for much less money, and in a much more polished, finished, decent state.

That's the difference. In real world you can get the same service at tonns of companys, which makes some of those company to set their goal to make quality product/service for best price, while EA just buys everything it wants, and suck the money out of the franchises and puts the base game content into DLCs, and forces releases to be too early.

p.s. I don't care about ppl dying in ME3's ending.

Agreed. At least EA improves their graphics.

+99, way worse, they don't want to put their games even on -50% sale

I concur

No, but because the game is a gigantic pile of shit and they aren't doing anyone a favor calling it by its real name.

Oh BUURRN!

No, I'm not. I'm just being honest. It's a turd, and no matter how much anyone tries to polish it - it's still just a turd. Life would be much easier if everyone was honest, and that includes video game journalists.

By my estimate, he is nine, actually -.-"

Yeah!!! me too!

Not that I love country or something. I just thought cruising through the desert in a car with no name while listening to K-rose was one of the best parts!!

Sure, it fueled their DLC sales and was a great lod of PR for them while most of those games, at least in their basic edition, didn't get too much sales anymore, I guess. They might just have made more money by doing that than by not doing.

Eh, ye I like to just ignore that so I can live in peace or whatever.

Not to sound like a child and say "NO, THAT'S DIFFERENT!" but the games have very different dlc types. While modders will make generic new weapons and stuff for Bethesda games, Bethesda will make DLC with huge storylines and stuff, something modders rarely bother with. Since Bethesda can make this stuff at a professional level faster than modders, there will always be appeal to buy them. While games like Sim City or Battlefield, the DLC is just new maps, new stuff to use, etc. Modders can do that too and much more. If Sim City were to start having storylines added to it with tons of voice actors and storyline scripting, then yeah, mods will have nothing on the DLC and EA wont have anything to worry about.

I question that fact too. Just because a lot of people do something does not mean it is smart.

I'm pretty sure everyone had some game-series that was lately destroyed by EA. Like latest Command and Conquer, or Dungeon Keeper (changed into mobile-game), Syndicate, Bioware-RPGs (now Bioware-shooters or hack'n'slashes)...

We don't hate EA cause it's cool to, we hate EA cause they just plain hate us.
NFS(Need For Speed)? Dead.
Black & White? Dead.
Battlefield? Dead.
Dungeon Keeper? Dead.

Just from these 4 series, you would be hating them for at least 1 of it if you ever played any.