in your opinion

1 decade ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Warband.

It's better than the original in every way and Fire & Sword is just badly made. With the Napoleonic Wars DLC, F&S is made redundant anyway.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+11

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+infinity

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+more

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+more x2

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+insane

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Warband.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

++++1

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Napolean wars better than chyvalry

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I like all of them to be honest. I would get warband first though

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

this is true, every M&B game is good in its own, but warband is a good place to start

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Warband.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I played the first one a ton more than WF&S, never played Warband though, though in my opinion I don't think it's much better than the original or WF&S

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Warband adds a number of balancing and new features compared to the original. Not to mention the MP part for those who like it.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

But these were present in WF&S weren't they?

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you mean balancing, yes and no. Since new features (mainly guns) have come in play, it changes many things and it sometimes feels unbalanced.
If you mean MP, yes there is. I don't really know hte difference since I never go MP.

Overall I feel like the game should be played with blades (ranged as secondary weapons) more than firearms.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I have to agree, despite liking WF&S a ton, I still think that it was better without guns (like in the first one)

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

thanks everyone

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Warband wins, hands down in every aspect I can think of. Play it with one or more mods, they are really plentiful and add A LOT.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 8 months ago.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I've heard Warband. I got the original cus there are some REALLY cool mods (Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Western, and more), and I don't think those are on Warband (though maybe some day). So whether you want the core game get Warband, or more interesting mods get the original.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

alot of the original mods got carried over to warband

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Warband is by far the best. If you want to play multiplayer, the Napoleonic Wars DLC is awesome.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Warband + mods.

Jesus, I even played Star Wars with it. It's a masterpiece.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

warband + floris mod pack or prophecy of pendor, there is even starwars and lotr mods, mods make warband epic, even civil war mods and whatnot

edit: war of the roses isnt bad either, and M&B Bannerlord will hopefuly be super epic uberawsomeness

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Warband

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Like most, I preferred Warband.
While With Fire & Sword seems nice with the guns and grenades, it quickly feels cluncky and loses the impact that the 1st games made.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 1 decade ago by thecreed123.