I feel a bit the same. I played chivalry and Mount and Blade. In coparison WoR or how its called has nice graphics and i like the combat system(like M&B), but the combat feels a bit slow. However the customisation is great. I hope they improve the gamplayspeed a bit to make it more intense....
Comment has been collapsed.
That's the whole point... dueling isn't just smashing your sword down like a barbarian
Comment has been collapsed.
Played WoTR first and then Chivalry. So far I've spent more time on Chivalry and I think it's a better game overall. I only play duels in Chivalry as everything else just frustrates me. I do like WoTR's archery a lot better than Chivalry's, but that's about the only redeeming factor about it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare
64 HOURS PLAYED
LAST PLAYED YESTERDAY
'nuff said
Comment has been collapsed.
Lot better than Chivalry in my opinion. Maybe combat is slower, but it's more realistic that way. It's team oriented game and i think i have money well spent on WOTR.
Comment has been collapsed.
Duly noted! - was curious about this, as, similarly, I was slightly disappointed in title Chivalry: Medieval Warfare, yet have fond memories of the original free HL2 mod (Chivalry) which was wicked fun! I suspect highly polished graphics & high fidelity effects / environments comes @ the sacrifice of engaging, satisfying & fast-paced / smooth combat mechanics - of which there's no substitute, in my opinion.
All of which are American dreams...
Comment has been collapsed.
i am not a big fan of this kind of game but i tried war of the roses, warband and chivalry... Warband is the best,then chivalry ant last war of the roses IMO. If someone love these games dont do a crime to own all :) I bought war band and i am fine with that only...if i win the others well..good
Comment has been collapsed.
Also keep in mind this game is far from finished it's missing Siege mode (it's confirmed and coming soon) which will add tons of fun and a better replayability, besides Fatshark will be providing content updates on monthly basis. (and so far they delivered)
Comment has been collapsed.
So what? I had such disappointment not long ago, it was called "Max Payne 3", and where was my own reasons for that. It's a matter of taste here, you know.
With WotR I needed about half an hour to understand - this not my kind of game. Neither "WotR", nor "Chivalry".
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, here's my ranking for those 3 games.
WotR was very dissapointing for me, as well, I hoped it would be a lot more similar to mount and blade, which it wasn't. The archery combat was awesome but everything else pretty much bad. The combat felt very chunky, slow, hard and unresponsive, unlike Mount and Blade. I like Chivalry, as well, but Mount and Blade will remain my number 1.
Comment has been collapsed.
1,432 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by Formidolosus
2 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by OneManArmyStar
36 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by steveywonder75
0 Comments - Created 55 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
47,482 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by NeFi
242 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by madjoki
31 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by WastedYears
28 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by zpangwin
1 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by mirum
4,534 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by ShroudOfLethe
120 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by Patxxv
13 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by wigglenose
135 Comments - Last post 48 minutes ago by Naviis
14 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by fr0zenX
Am I the only one who was expecting a lot more from this game? Who else tested it out? Give me your thoughts about this "Chivalry's rival".
If I discover that I'm the only one who didn't like it I might make a giveaway for it in the next few days, since I've been wanting to make a non-bundle one for quite some time.
Thx
Comment has been collapsed.