.

7 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Would you like to see a feature?

View Results
Yes! I would like to see this feature!
No way!
Oh... I'm just here for the potatoes..

no. points refresh too fast anyway

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sorry, is that a point against the OP's suggestion... or in favor of it? :P

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm always at 300P really...

Normally I won't enter if its not high on my wishlist so I leave it to someone who appreciates it more. Like there were 2 entries in a Dark Souls 3 game and I was one of them. I have only played a bit of the first and the other person seemed very excited when I checked back into the giveaway. So I removed my entry so they won it :)

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I hafta admit, varied P values is a bit of a weird concept to begin with, especially as it doesn't base off bundle-list-status, but off retail price alone. Kinda feels more intuitive to just have every game at the same entry cost (rather than making it more or less favorable, cost-wise, to enter for specific games).

But yeah, no matter how high you set the value, it's not really going to affect anyone (given how high P gain is, most days), unless you're talking the really low P cost games that +1ers reliably go after, and you can simply give those away via a method that's less likely to attract them (eg, private giveaways).

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I actually like the idea, but the P value of each game is related to steam prices. Besides, real cv is calculated using the this system, so I'm not sure if it's actually feasible to adjust each of them individually.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 7 years ago by HS2.