Me cago en el rey y en la reina, monarquía hijos de puta. O lo que es lo mismo, no sois mas tontopollas porque no entrenáis

#WeAllAreThatGuy

Back in the medieval times. xD Bring the pitchforks and start burning witches. xD
In Greece, we have so many religious fanatics though. There was a public outcry against the facebook page called Elder Pastitsios. Do you have many supporters of the monarch in Spain? Was there a public outcry against the person that spoke against him?
We Greeks don't deserve the green colour, MrCastiglia. :/

Here in Venezuela there has been people already in jail just for an opinion in Twitter, no matter how offensive it may have been it shows a clear lack of freedom. In Spain, for what I know, politics are the typical corrupt douches, because of that Podemos is getting more popular around there.

If someone mocked your family member? What are you, 13? Grown ups don't go on global jihad because they were offended!

Here you go, pavepode! Don't take it personally.
http://www.laughfactory.com/jokes/yo-momma-jokes

How's that Freedonia thing people were doing in Cophenhagen?

In the past. Now I have some doubts D

View attached image.

I'm more of a heterodox anarchist. But close enough.

I haven't heard that term before. Would you recommend to me an author or exponent of the minarchist????

Yeah, and let's not forget our nation building, where we manipulate other countries' elections and support authoritarian governments because we think it will help our interests. We put guys like Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, and Gaddaffi in power then go and assassinate them when they stop being our puppets.

I agree, you can say pretty much what you like. But notice how the man who you freely 'speak against' is master over you and you have no choice in the matter.

Trump leading the US? God save us all! Oh, sorry, lapse of reason: forgot i'm an atheist. Whatever save us all!

or a free ride when you've already paid

hands you your tinfoil hat

Point 1: Assange is currently avoiding extradition to Sweden for allegations of rape, not because of the things he published, for one. For two, Wikileaks published a large number of top secret American military and espionage documents, some of which included active missions in the field, thus putting lives of American soldiers and espionage agents at risk. So, if he were to be extradited to the United States as he claims will happen if he is extradited to Sweden, it would be under charges of espionage, not because of censorship. Just like Russian spies who stole military and espionage information in the 40s-90s were, he would be considered a foreign national actively working against the interests of the United States government and be treated as such. The fact that he hides under the umbrella of "freedom of information" and "freedom of the press" does not negate the fact that he put information about military and civilian government operations out where anyone from your average Joe to ISIS could access it and thus put government employees in harm's way. That is espionage, even if it was unintentional, which is debatable.

Point 2: A Stasi officer in the apartment block is a very overt form of surveillance. None of the surveillance on the internet in the United States is overt. Communications are not "heavily policed". There may be surveillance in place, but the majority of the population does not and will not see any results of that, because much of the surveillance is targeted at counter-terrorism and major crimes, not the smaller things ordinary people might do on the internet. If it were more actively targeting individuals, there would be a lot fewer instances of child molesters and pedophiles luring their victims online.

Point 3: I actually agree with this point, which is why I am an active supporter of Net Neutrality and laws that would prevent ISPs and other private - note, private means non-government, therefore their actions are not government censorship - organizations from interfering in the equality of information access on the internet.

Point 4: If you honestly think that the citizens of the United States have as much censorship and as little online freedom as Cuban or North Korean citizens, then I don't think you've ever visited the United States or done your due diligence in research. If a Cuban or North Korean citizen says something online against the government, then they know they are risking being arrested. If I, as a United States citizen living in the United States, say something online against the government, the worse I risk is an internet argument on Facebook or a message board with someone who disagrees with me. I will not be arrested, I will not be reprimanded, nor will I lose my job or job opportunities. In fact, if I were fired simply because I said something critical of the government, I could sue the company that fired me over political discrimination, and I would likely never have to work again.

TL;DR: Check your facts. Hyperbolic statements simply make you look like a conspiracy theorist who failed to do the most basic of research, not someone who "simply took some licenses".

the map you showed is available on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_by_country
Note that it doesn't differentiate between censorship and surveillance.

The U.S. ins listed as pervasive because it "is engaged in mass surveillance of the Internet"

I'm specifically referring to this particular statement.
There is virtually no censorship of the internet here (except for child pornography and copyright violations)

You're wrong man, just admit you're a sensationalist who either doesn't know, ignores, or warps the facts.

They best part about your baseless argument is you provide ZERO examples -- a clear sign of opinion and not fact.

sorry, my country isn't even the US but you seem like a toxic person. Just saying :)

Al Capone paid for soup kitchens as a PR move.

If the state claims they own you and what you produce, of course they want you safe.

What I'm asking is have you ever tried to leave your owner?

Let it be, it seems I'm just delusional and the USA is Paradise on earth.

Western democracies? The implied comparison of protection against piracy or child pornography and such with blocking of major search sites or international sites is ridiculous.

its too late ;_;

That's military related, I don't see how that is at all relevant to the normal population.

Wow, Fox news. Totally unbiased. :rolleyes:

Well, if you give out sensitive information there, that's on you (not sure they require more than any name and a working e-mail address?). I don't use it much anymore, just to keep up with people who still do. And "social experiments" sounds a bit harsher than what it is ...

Would you tell me the name of that podcast?? This is an interesting topic to me.

Hate to break it to you, but every time you go into the doctor's office they log stuff in your record. Researchers can then use that data in aggregate to see if there's correlations to any diseases with BMI, medications, etc. Do you object to that?

Just basic geography...

View attached image.

Well, they're all wrong :P

Además que tanto en castellano como en inglés, nos podemos referir a los Estados Unidos de América, como América. Y ya no sólo porque lo recoja la RAE (que son un poco bobetes, además que no soy fan del determinismo lingüístico) si no porque lo puede hacer como sinécdoque que es un tipo de metonimia. Es decir referirse a una parte (los EEUU) por el todo (América). Es como cuando dices, "Vino la policía" no vino toda la policía, si no los 4 o 5 que había por allá.

Pero no, sieeeeeeeeeeeeempre tiene que saltar alguien a corregirlo. En fin, Pilar. Qué le vamos a hacer.

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/341905-nsa-us-leaks-terrorism/ not the least bit worried about the surveillance lol they don't have the AI to crunch the data.

nope. That's expensive too.

View attached image.